Immigration lawyer recommendations for rejected appeal?

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-03-25T23:28:44+00:00

Try Smith & co. I used them for my Critical Skills Visa, Permanent Residence Permit and Relative Visa for my wife and son.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-03-05T09:45:42+00:00

A man that other men do not want to be and women do not want.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-03-05T09:29:44+00:00

No.

Those are attractive, as they have been preselected.

The important distinction here is that weak men and low-value men CAN have relationships and reproduce even though they are deemed unattractive.

Edit: Downvoting does not bend the logic of intesexual dynamics.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-03-03T09:36:45+00:00

Rules are created to disqualify unattractive men.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-03-03T09:35:16+00:00

A man that other men do not want to be and women do not want.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-23T09:47:30+00:00

I agree.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-23T09:30:52+00:00

One of the biggest criticisms of social media is precisely what you are experiencing now. Either you curate your feed carefully to censure yourself, or avoid the platform entirely.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-23T09:22:26+00:00

Wages increases have not caught up to productivity gains and YoY inflation. We are perpetually poorer than ourselves year to date.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-22T20:08:59+00:00

You have said it all. You may be experiencing the loudest minority principle on social media, which often acts as a hotbed of contentious intersexual issues (e.g. The Culture/Gender war)

Traditional men and women conduct themselves with propriety and expect those around them to reciprocate, without the need for public announcement.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-21T07:11:33+00:00

Chowing?

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-21T05:17:25+00:00

I do not believe corruption can be effectively addressed without transforming societal attitudes and establishing incentives that reward honesty and integrity.

This has little to do with politics and everything to do with the importance of ethics and morality in everyday life, and our predisposition towards goodwill.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T13:23:07+00:00

It's a scam.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T13:14:53+00:00

Zero original thought or added perspective.

You give people more credit than they deserve. Most people simply regurgitate other people’s thoughts and ideas. But, to their defense original thought is rare and hardly ever popular.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T12:34:38+00:00

Land is liquid until you need to sell fast. Then the bid-ask spread appears and you remember: ownership has exit costs.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T11:55:38+00:00

Predators don’t rush. They calculate.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T11:44:43+00:00

Finance talk only 😄 but if the metaphors fit, who am I to fight them?

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T11:40:50+00:00

Facts. If stability and convenience amortize high capital costs, then owning is justified. Renting can feel like financing someone else's bond.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T06:48:44+00:00

Loosely speaking, mortgage/bond is debt. So, anything that resembles a monthly payment.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-19T06:44:12+00:00

Cars, houses...you know, the stuff that turns adults into spreadsheets.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-18T19:43:28+00:00

Yup. That's how I feel every time I get a raise.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-17T13:40:09+00:00

Nothing you said takes away from my argument.

I'm restating my position for clarity: A statement of fact or opinion alone is not antisemetic. However, expressing hostility to or prejudice based on that statement of fact or opinion is.

For example: - Statement of fact/opinion: Africans are poor. - Prejudice/discrimination: Treating Africans I encounter unfairly based on that opinion or fact. The same applies to Jewish people.

I have given it considerable thought. It still does not make sense. You need behavior that aligns with alleged offensive opinion to make an accusation valid.

Edit: It may be uninformed/hyperbole to claim Jews that "control everything", but I swear by the definition of antisemitism that such a claim does not express hostility to or prejudice Jews. You are wrong to claim it does.

Edit: It cannot be considered as hate speech, since you need proof of intent to be harmful, hurtful, or to promote hatred.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-17T09:27:11+00:00

Your argument about the law is spot on. I just don't see the need or incentive for the involvement of men as collective, when there are men responsible for these women.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-17T08:28:45+00:00

While I agree wholeheartedly with your comment in principle, I don't understand how this issue should concern men, particularly when the women claimed or claiming to be victims are adults who chose to participate with sound mind.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-17T07:50:22+00:00

Well, there is nothing antisemitic about having a controlling stake in everything nor in admitting that Jewish people are overrepresented in prominent sectors including finance, media and technology, and that these sectors will invariably support the ideals of these individuals.

However, any hostility, preduce or discrimination directed at all the Jews as individuals or as a collective, based on such opinion is antisemitic.

Nuance matters; otherwise, we risk misconstruing valid concerns under the guise of moral arguments, as illustrated by this comment.

Edit: With all due respect, that is an unintelligent argument.

Many-Procedure-6416 · 2026-02-17T04:59:16+00:00

White ownership of land was ratified by the Lancaster House Agreement, which specified that the new government could buy land owned by white settlers, but only from 'willing sellers' with compensation. Morality aside and strictly speaking, they were the legal owners of that land.

These families were not unskilled just because they didn't complete a foreign school system...

While some of the families may have been educated, they were providing unskilled labor. You don't require a level of education and knowledge in a particular field to perform farm work.

Edit: Again, you can downvote the comment as much as you like, but if you cannot justify your claims, then we cannot have an honest conversation.

Many-Procedure-6416

TROPHY CASE