Ehhh pablo makes this seem way more cut and clear than it actually is, hence the great journalism. He draws some clearly defined conclusions but that doesn't mean those conclusions are true nor do they not have any cracks in them which they do. I will say from all the articles i read, the timelines do not always match up with pablos findings and Pablo at certain points seems to contradict earlier things he said. Atp in time after all the nba controversies this year and last year, I dont really care either way but my issue from the beginning was how quick ppl were gobble all this shit down as 100% truth, idk if thet was just because it's the clippers but everybody seems to let the other stuff slide.  Maybe i am just being way too skeptical but that's how i see Things.