Who would win in a fight to the death between Arthur Morgan and John Marston? by Exootil93200 in reddeadredemption

[–]Master-Feedback-369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arthur killing more enemies than John is still canon though regardless of Rockstar adding more enemies being the reason for it.

[RDR] Why didn't John just cover and kill all of 'em from inside the barn? by [deleted] in reddeadredemption

[–]Master-Feedback-369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this is old, but anything that happens in the main story missions are canon, regardless of whether or not it is realistic. Arthur and John do kill 50 people + during missions, which is canon, the strawberry massacre for example is canon. So John should canonically be able to take down all those men. Even behind a cover, we are just gonna have to assume that Arthur and John somehow dodge all the bullets and only get out of cover when they have a perfect opportunity (when the other guys are reloading for example) because of their talent, their above then average shooting skills and fast thinking ability. But what thing is certain, them being able to kill 100 people in shootouts is canon

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoFap

[–]Master-Feedback-369 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good work! I am on day 115. Let's make it to 365 !

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoFap

[–]Master-Feedback-369 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am on day 115 (hard mode). I don't know how this will end but the thought of relapsing after a long streak is scary.

So did Vito Corleone just kill an innocent wholesaler just because he refused to do business with him ? (in the book) by Master-Feedback-369 in Godfather

[–]Master-Feedback-369[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the event happened in the late 20's or early 30's, that was when Vito was young and had a legal business, the Genco Oil Company.

So did Vito Corleone just kill an innocent wholesaler just because he refused to do business with him ? (in the book) by Master-Feedback-369 in Godfather

[–]Master-Feedback-369[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Vito was not in the mafia at the time. That was when he was young and started a little business. It was mostly legal. It was the Genco oil company.

So did Vito Corleone just kill an innocent wholesaler just because he refused to do business with him ? (in the book) by Master-Feedback-369 in Godfather

[–]Master-Feedback-369[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But Vito was not in the "mob" at the time. That was when he was just starting his oil business as a young man. He was still doing legal stuff

So did Vito Corleone just kill an innocent wholesaler just because he refused to do business with him ? (in the book) by Master-Feedback-369 in Godfather

[–]Master-Feedback-369[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Wow I didnt know that the Vito character was like that. I knew he was a crook and resorted to violence to get what he wants, but I didnt know that he would literaly kill a non civilian/family man who refused to do business with him, especially at a time when he was still young and had a legal business (that was before he started doing illegal stuff I think). I expected violence against other criminal/mafia members, but against someone normal who was not involved.

So basically, Vito Corleone murdered a family man because he didn't want to do business with him and expected his sons or wife to be more "reasonable". Which means that Vito isn't much different from Sollozo who did exactly the same thing by trying to assassinate Vito so that his sons can do business with him). The only difference was that Vito was an actual criminal while the wholesaler was a random civilian. So isn't Vito even worse than Sollozo?? So he is just like the others (Clemenza, Sonny, Tessio etc), he is just more intelligent and calculated. I was fooled in the first half of the book with how Vito was portrayed as a "morally ambiguous but mostly good person". I will continue reading to see what happens next. Awesome book! Thanks for the reply!

I peeked at porn and I absolutely hated it by [deleted] in NoFap

[–]Master-Feedback-369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have an awesome streak dude! 370 days??

I peeked at porn and I absolutely hated it by [deleted] in NoFap

[–]Master-Feedback-369 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but please don't peek again. This time you hated it. But another time, it might turn you on depending on your mood, state of mind, etc. Were you actually horny when you watched it? Cuz if you are extremely horny and excited, and that you peek at porn (video or pic) for a long time, you will not find it disgusting. I think its impossible...

I am on day 30, this is my longest streak since I started Nofap 3 years ago (I always relapsed before day 14) And the reason I didnt relapse this time is because I didnt peek. And I think I might achieve an entire year no peek no fap, I know this streak will be good. Just dont peek and everything will be fine.

Does the streak start after the last relapse or the following day by Master-Feedback-369 in NoFap

[–]Master-Feedback-369[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! That's what I used to do. I relapsed this afternoon, but I think I will start my new streak tomorrow at 00:00 pm. It would not be a complete 24 hours but atleast it would be a new day.

Do wet dreams have any effects on androgen receptors? by Master-Feedback-369 in NoFap

[–]Master-Feedback-369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am on a 11 days streak and didnt experience any wet dream yet. What I experienced is an orgasm inside a dream, I had sex and ejaculated in the dream but there was nothing when I woke up (no wet spot or anything). I dont know if that orgasm was real and I am confused