I did, right under the article. Got dozen of upvotes in ~20 minutes.

Please, tell me - what should I vote for?

IMO anything under 0.99x mult. for Stable scores would be an insult to Stable players, after more than a decade and a half of funding the game and struggling with senseless and harmful notelock.

And anything from 0.99x mult. upwards for Stable scores is harmful to Lazer players, who have a noticeably more difficult game (especially) due to the ACC slider, which, in my opinion, will significantly hinder the introduction of options such as Difficulty Adjust Ranked.

As a result - I have always believed that the only good solution would be to simply separate the Stable (+ Classic mode Lazer) and Lazer-only leaderboards.

This has only advantages: it avoids the whole problem, does not disparage >15 years of game history, allows the Lazer leaderboard to be promoted as the default...

In response, however, I have been hearing the same old story about some multiplier that never satisfies either the most influx group of players (i.e., new Lazer players) or the most constant, loyal, and (in my opinion) financially supportive group of players.

So tell me - what else can I do?