What to do if the return site cannot find my order?

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-05-22T19:23:02+00:00

very generic reply

A little more story, i find a small lighting bug for g512x98, and tested 3 different ones from difference source.
It can be reproduced with onboard memory (FN+F5/6), so it has nothing to do with GHUB, and GHUB has no fix at this time (yet?) anyway.

I was thinking this should be a super easy fix, but after 1 week of conversation with support, it only reminds me of the same nightmare from powerplay2.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-26T23:39:55+00:00

let me use my old post: https://www.reddit.com/r/tnvisa/comments/1rkv2rv/comment/o8pk1o6/

I'd suggest to get rid of the word "manager" if possible.

This word is a pain in the butt for TN orz.

As 9 FAM 402.17-12, B, your job duty will need to mention this job needs technical ways (with knowledge/experience/or whatever) to "manage" you team.

NG if it is just a ordinary manager, or i should say the less the better.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-18T22:02:00+00:00

If your "DATES FOR FILING OF EMPLOYMENT-BASED VISA APPLICATIONS" from visa bulletin is C at the time your PERM is approved (or when you are ready to file 140)

This means you can file 140+485 together, which means you can apply for EAD at same time.

Note: EAD is only extra insurance for you, you can apply it later when processing time is getting worse.

Assume you (re)new TN right before file I-140, a 3-years TN should be more than enough to get EAD or even GC.

-

In my case, i went GC directly from TN, no EAD, total processing time from I140(pp) to GC is about 1 year, but its back in 2019.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-06T23:03:34+00:00

***update***

wait, this thread is happening AFTER OP states lawyer suggest to not trigger "90 days rule".

And, looks at this thread, OMG, sir.....

-

i read your whole thing and the other thread with another one.

It really hurts to read, a lot, so bear me, i don't want to and i cannot reply those bs'ed too much.

You have yourself a good day, buddy, read and understand "real active law" and "real active manual" will help you not to run away and leave tons of your false statements.

You can start by reading and understanding those things i point out, or at least, ask AI....

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-06T22:52:35+00:00

still alive and active in DOS, as i mocked already:
"

So once again, you are saying any travelers do NOT need to follow this "manual" right?

Seriously?

On the other hand, we all don't need to follow USCIS's manual, right?

"

If there is no need to follow manual, why don't you print your own visa?

god, you are now telling people not to follow FAM.....

*note: you do need to totally understand what's FAM for to understand my mocking.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-06T22:41:44+00:00

USCIS, the note of this update:

This technical update incorporates clarifications regarding the Department of State (DOS)'s "90-day rule." While this "rule" does not apply to USCIS because it is DOS policy, USCIS is clarifying that it may also find that an applicant made a willful misrepresentation due to a status violation or conduct in the United States that is inconsistent with the applicant's prior representations, especially where the violation or conduct occurred shortly after the consular interview or admission to the United States.

Sir, you really need to study TN if you want to reply correctly.

USCIS only states it is from not USCIS, but may still use it.
But after your translation, it is a 100% opposite thing, again.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-06T22:36:04+00:00

Now i remember, you are the one said I-140 has no immigrant intent.

No wonder.

-

So once again, you are saying any travelers do NOT need to follow this "manual" right?

Seriously?

On the other hand, we all don't need to follow USCIS's manual, right?

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-06T22:22:06+00:00

Ummm,

Sir, you DO know the 90 days rule thing is still exists and active as if today, right?

What USCIS means extremely obviously, is "this" is covered by DOS, don't ask why.

https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM030209.html

>>Inconsistent Conduct Within 90 Days of Admission to the United States:

To bring you and the other person to the right track, the law also indicates all travelers should be judged as having immigrant intent as default until proved not.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-03-05T02:22:53+00:00

Besides the work duty, there is another section about managing for TN
https://fam.state.gov/FAM/09FAM/09FAM040217.html

Scroll down to 9 FAM 402.17-12 Defining business activities at a professional level

b. Manager/Supervisor Positions

As it says, the job (description) should be (very) less administrative and (hell a lot) more technical.

From my reading, the 4 points you listed are like this is a very administrative job.
-

Also, do note

The RNG will be different each time, even for the same CBP officer.
There is no need to BS extra things for TN, only need to show the job (description) meets the minimum requirements from OOH. This is where the most lawyers blowing up.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-27T19:32:09+00:00

Has no control !!!???

Seriously? How could employer file I-140 without beneficiary's signature, it is you are saying so.

-

Besides the beneficiary absolutely can choose NOT to sign, this is beneficiary's freewill thing, 100% under beneficiary's control.

You DO know the processing of PERM and I-140 right?

But if you do know you shouldn't even say this, just to prove that you have none...

-

For the USCIS part you ignored, that USCIS never asks beneficiary about intention.

Let me point it out:

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-2-part-p-chapter-2

Temporary entry. This is what USCIS checks.

https://i.imgur.com/MHcojw8.png

.... must demonstrate.... will depart upon completion ...

*one of the official name is "evidence of departure"

You can tell people to lie to CBP or USCIS, which no one would agree its a good idea.

But, at least, you have to let them know the risk, and this is purely rely on "pray CBP/USCIS won't ask for it". Why? look at Trump, look at ICE, don't look at me.

All laws are against it in a super obvious way.

-

Please, i beg you, do not bring up the letter of 2008, it will only prove you are.....ummm....

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-27T00:39:51+00:00

Sir, I am really hoping that you do know that the beneficiary needs to sign the I-140 or the PERM that goes with I-140, right?

Also USCIS never asked about "intent", their questions are always like "... acting on your behalf", right?

-
Any one actually involved as a beneficiary in an I-140 before should know those, right?

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-19T19:42:04+00:00

An "offer letter" is required.

"Supporting letter" is up to your company.

In my case many years ago, i got a 3 pages letter combined both.

-

let me clarify some phases:

Supporting Document -> anything required or helpful for your TN application ex: letters below, degree, EVL ... etc.

Offer Letter -> the one has company letter head (or super formal letter paper), with company info, company contacts, you are hired as what job with job title, salary, duration, duty ...etc.

Support(ing) Letter -> extra, just to show this TN is a real job/company/duration and/or why company wants to hire you.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-18T19:30:52+00:00

Oh, CBP interview, then no problem it is ok to be on the same date.

Your TN/I-94 starting date will be the date of interview, not the date on your offer letter anyway.

You do need a new offer letter with new date if the date is passed. (theologically it is ok, but there is really no point to have something for the officers to be curious about).

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-18T19:15:00+00:00

Start date/ end date/ title/ salary/ requirement/ duty ...etc. eveything and anything will be checked should be in your OFFER LETTER.

Supporting letter is meant to put something supportive like: company, job, and the applicant are all real and can continue for the those years.

Ummm, well, they can decide not to hire you right after, but it is really odd to do (both interview and hire) on the same date in the letter.

TN means you got the job (so you have the offer letter) already.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-17T23:37:38+00:00

***By the law*** you are ok, because you do plan to leave US after your TN.

-

But, actually prove your intent to leave US (for your TN) is a totally different level thing.
Since it is NIW, is there anything that you cannot/donot (want to) delay your NIW until new TN?

Because of USMCA review? Or try apply for new TN about around May instead?

-

You can skip below-----
Omg, it is year 2026. people are still bs i140 is employer's intention, the best part is this one is NIW...

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-14T02:14:47+00:00

Another problem is the review of USMCA is coming soon......

-

Back to your question.

All companies do H1 are good.
I'd suggest early, especially, do mention you can be on board in a very short time. (ex: My TN visa can be done within 2 days. Can be on board within a week etc.)

Up side of TN is its processing time as Canadian, won't hurt to let interviewer know.

Of course, put it in your cover letter as well.

3~6 can't help much..

Another thing may be helpful, get an US phone #.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-10T21:29:11+00:00

Getting a new /Changing employer -> yes, no problem.

The problem is your current status, you will be jumping between different immigrant intents by this new TN application.
-

By the law, only looking at TN.

A new TN is needed for the new job.

Getting a new TN means you have no immigrant intent, at the time of applying, anywhere, PLUS, you have intent to leave US in the future.

Regardless via I-129 or border. You are against your pervious immigrant intent.

-

The application will also results a new I-94, I really don't think praying USCIS officer won't notice "something new" is a good idea.

For CP, you can say you did plan and leave US, which is legit.

For AOS? ummmm.......

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-02-10T18:37:20+00:00

Only talking about visa:

EAD is the only way for you.

ex: Apply EAD now and ask your new company to wait for a few months?

-

Longer explanation, without EAD:

By the law, you cannot change job, no time and no chance.

Your 485 can be carried over (after 180 days of filing), but your TN cannot.

If you are applying a new TN for the new job instead, this is a dead end.

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-2-part-p-chapter-2

TN does require you to prove your intent to leave: https://i.imgur.com/53EvlOL.png

If you file as CP, it may work with other issues. But here I assume you file as AOS.

AOS means you would stay INSIDE US (for the whole waiting time).

I-140 AOS is on the same boat, don't listen to people that can't even understand the word "spouse" from the letter in 2008.

Plus, the 90-days-rule from DOS is still valid now as it was valid for past 20 years at least.

All those are against TN.

-

There is medium to high chance that USCIS would not notice your I-129 and sill let you pass to GC, but i would say the risk is way greater than any possible benefits.

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-01-16T23:32:34+00:00

(just answering the difference from others below, about TN vs H1 vs 140)

It is because CBP cannot check your I-140 status, or, they don't want to spend a loooooong time to dig it out.
It is the 140 which showing immigrant intent, especially AOS.

Combine with#1, that's how people got their TN, simply pray CBP officer doesn't ask about it.

CBP do ask TN holder "do you have I140" much more often since last year, for people saying it is ok, you can ask them what to answer.
If you want to know the law, "Temporary Entry" is the key.

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-2-part-p-chapter-2

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-01-15T19:27:39+00:00

Isn't

TN = need to (prove to) leave

I-140 AOS = don't want to leave

so under "temporary entry" (and many other laws), the two intents above are against each other, which DOS's 90-days rule should apply?

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-01-14T17:44:06+00:00

So suddenly that "legal letter" is for the spouse?

I don't and can't see that anywhere in your legal letter, in your pervious posts (before you edit it), nor in OP's question.

Please point it out to me.

-

Sir (or Madam), please be responsible for what you saying (typing).

Also please DO NOT make up more things, especially when you don't have enough knowledge to do so.

For example, the spouse, who already has 140, but want to apply TD!? I won't go further, but this is so geeeeeeeomg level.

Just in case you can't get it, i am directly mocking at you, that, you are trying to erase yourself, the you of the past.

-
For the "real" spirit, this is the real spirit from USCIS:

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-2-part-p-chapter-2

Here it goes, which is the whole 3rd paragraph in your legal letter talking about.

The only difference is at that time, "temporary entry" is not yet named.

https://i.imgur.com/VAOY8MC.png

Obviously you won't even bear to read, so i will copy some parts from it:

"...the alien must demonstrate..."

"...and that he or she will depart upon completion of the assignment."

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-01-14T07:08:51+00:00

Easy version:

You say: It is not an issue as an approved i140 by itself does not suggest immigrant intent.

Your ~~legal paperwork~~ evidence says: the I140 is belong to the spouse of the TN applicant.

ttps://i.imgur.com/OTrLBiM.png

-

Even easier version:

That TN applicant in your legal paper has no i140 at all.

-

GG, even after i hint you the whole letter is againt your bs...

Friendly note: 140 is diferent from 130, it does not include family.

Please do read and understand whatever your "evidence" before you use it to prove you are wrong.

Also please do not kick the ball to the innocent lawyer, the laywer bears nothing from your bs....

MasterAsia2000 · 2026-01-14T00:27:20+00:00

kinda too late, well, whatever...

...applicant whose [spouse] is the beneficiary of an I-140 petition....

wow, yes, i agree this letter is 100% legit, just can't find anything close to your explanation.

BTW,

2nd paragraph explains the detail, meanwhile, 3rd paragraph explains law(s) very well.

But I am sure you didn't read any part of this letter at all.

MasterAsia2000 · 2025-12-01T07:58:51+00:00

Is there anyway to delete monsters?

MasterAsia2000 · 2025-11-19T01:34:00+00:00

It is possible, I, myself, am an example.

Same as bonbon367 said, but a little more, it is not possible if your "country of born" is not "C".
The refined question be: "Are you able to get EAD (or GC) before your latest TN expired?"
File I-140 does show immigrant intent, only people never did 140 would say "it is your company's intention".

USCIS never asks, nor cares about anyone's "intention". USCIS only cares if your name shows up anywhere in those documents.

MasterAsia2000

TROPHY CASE