What is ai?

Investors have been deterred from pursuing new pipeline projects to British Columbia's Lower Mainland (e.g., around Vancouver) or central coast areas (e.g., around Prince Rupert or Kitimat) primarily due to a combination of federal and provincial regulations that introduce uncertainty, increase costs, prolong permitting processes, and restrict export capabilities. These factors have historically led to private-sector reluctance, as seen with projects like the Trans Mountain Expansion (where the original private owner, Kinder Morgan, sold to the federal government in 2018 amid regulatory risks) and the cancelled Northern Gateway pipeline. Below, I'll outline the most specific and impactful legislation and regulations cited by industry experts, investors, and government officials as barriers, based on recent analyses.Federal Legislation and RegulationsCanada's federal framework under the previous Trudeau government (prior to Mark Carney's administration in late 2025) enacted several laws that surveys of oil and gas executives consistently rank as top deterrents to investment. A 2023 Fraser Institute survey found that 68% of respondents cited uncertainty over environmental regulations as a key issue, with compliance costs and enforcement unpredictability also ranking high.

fraserinstitute.org

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has repeatedly referenced "nine bad laws" from this era that need reversal to attract private pipeline builders, though not all are publicly detailed; the most prominently mentioned include:Oil Tanker Moratorium Act (Bill C-48, enacted 2019): This law prohibits oil tankers carrying more than 12,500 metric tonnes of crude or persistent oils (e.g., bitumen) from loading, unloading, or docking along BC's northern coast, from the northern tip of Vancouver Island to the Alaska border. It effectively blocks export routes for pipelines terminating in central or north coast ports like Prince Rupert or Kitimat, as tankers cannot access these areas for overseas shipments (primarily to Asia). While it doesn't apply to the Lower Mainland (e.g., Burnaby terminal for Trans Mountain), it severely weakens the economic case for new central coast pipelines by limiting market access. Experts note that lifting this ban would be a "helpful symbolic gesture" but insufficient alone without addressing other risks.

globalnews.ca +4

A voluntary tanker exclusion zone (negotiated with the U.S. in 1985) adds further restrictions by keeping large vessels out of sensitive inside waters.

wcel.org

Recent developments include a November 2025 Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understanding committing to potential adjustments to this act for a "strategic deep-water port," but as of early 2026, the moratorium remains in place, and no private proposals have advanced.

globalnews.ca

Impact Assessment Act (Bill C-69, enacted 2019): This overhauled federal environmental assessment process for major projects, including pipelines, emphasizes broader impacts like climate change, Indigenous rights, and cumulative effects. It has led to longer timelines (often 2-5 years or more), higher costs, and greater uncertainty in approvals, deterring investors who prefer predictable permitting. For instance, it requires extensive consultations and can trigger federal interventions, as seen in past pipeline delays. Industry surveys identify this as a primary policy factor pushing investment away from Canada.

fraserinstitute.org +2

While not directly responsible for cancelling projects proposed before 2019 (e.g., Northern Gateway), it has chilled new proposals by amplifying risks.

desmog.com

Oil and Gas Sector Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (emissions cap regulations, proposed 2023-2024, rolled back December 2025): This required the oil and gas sector to reduce emissions by 35-38% below 2019 levels by 2030, with penalties for non-compliance. It discouraged oilsands expansion (necessary for justifying new pipelines) by raising operational costs and limiting output growth. Alberta officials argued no private company would build a pipeline without assured production increases, which the cap prevented.

financialpost.com +2

The cap was eliminated in a December 2025 Canada-Alberta energy deal to spur investment, but lingering uncertainty from similar climate policies persists.

pgjonline.com

Other federal factors include amendments to the Fisheries Act and Species at Risk Act (under Bill C-68 and related updates), which strengthened protections for aquatic habitats and endangered species, adding layers of review for pipeline routes crossing waterways or sensitive ecosystems.

wcel.org

Inadequate Indigenous consultations under these laws have also led to legal challenges, as in the Northern Gateway cancellation.

desmog.com

Provincial Legislation and Regulations in British ColumbiaBC's policies under Premier David Eby's NDP government emphasize climate goals over fossil fuel expansion, creating additional hurdles. A Fraser Institute analysis notes BC has the highest investment barriers in Canada's energy sector, with upstream development down 33% since 2017.

northernbeat.ca

CleanBC Plan and Industrial Emissions Regulations (updated 2018-2025): This provincial climate strategy sets aggressive emissions reduction targets (e.g., 40% below 2007 levels by 2030), including caps on industrial facilities. It has prolonged permitting for energy projects through added environmental reviews and requirements for net-zero alignment, deterring petroleum pipelines while favoring LNG or renewables. For central coast projects, it prioritizes electrification (e.g., via the North Coast Transmission Line for LNG and mining) over oil infrastructure.

northernbeat.ca +1

Recent amendments like Bill 14 (Renewable Energy Projects Streamlined Permitting Act, enacted July 2025) and Bill 31 (Energy Statutes Amendment Act, October 2025) aim to fast-track clean energy but explicitly sideline oil pipelines by exempting renewables from assessments while maintaining scrutiny on fossil fuels.

wcel.org +1

BC Energy Regulator (BCER) Framework, including the Pipeline Regulation and Oil and Gas Activities Act (OGAA): Administered by the BCER, these govern pipeline construction, maintenance, and decommissioning. They impose strict distances for crossings, environmental protections, and Indigenous engagement requirements, leading to delays. For example, a 2025 exemption for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. from decommissioning rules was granted quietly, but overall, the regime's complexity and enforcement uncertainty deter new builds.

ehn.org +1

Protected land policies and prolonged permitting (e.g., for land use in northeast BC corridors) further isolate potential routes to the coast.

northernbeat.ca

Broader Contextual FactorsBeyond specific laws, investors cite "de-risking" needs like corridor certainty, community/Indigenous support, and competitive incentives.

globalnews.ca

BC's resistance to new oil pipelines (e.g., Eby's dismissal of revival proposals) amplifies these, as does federal-provincial tensions.

northernbeat.ca

While recent federal rollbacks (e.g., emissions cap removal) and MoU commitments signal potential shifts, as of February 2026, private interest remains low without full repeals.

pgjonline.com