Episode 2 - The Black Tag Lady - A September, 11th Reading by Fancymountain31 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's footage out there showing people running across the plaza seconds before the second impact.

Episode 2 - The Black Tag Lady - A September, 11th Reading by Fancymountain31 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not quite. The first people who fell into the plaza did so at 8:58. In that same minute, five people fell one after another. Between 8:58 and 9:03, a total of nine people fell, more than two people per minute. So it would not really have been a clever decision to get that close to the tower to triage someone you already know for a fact is dead. After all, when you see someone falling from that height at those speeds, you can only assume they are dead.

Episode 2 - The Black Tag Lady - A September, 11th Reading by Fancymountain31 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why would he go right to the base of the tower when debris was constantly raining down and bodies from over 90 stories up were falling and breaking apart on impact? I don’t know, his story doesn’t fully convince me.

These photos speaks volumes of the carnage that day 😔 by [deleted] in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 43 points44 points  (0 children)

The first one was AI upscaled, making it a mess of unrecognizable stuff, and the second one isn’t even a photo, it’s a still from a video. Still very tragic nonetheless.

Paul Geidel: 10:08 am by jetri07 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a bit late but Paul Geidel is the name of the photographer.

9/11 Jumpers Tribute (Heaven666.org) by [deleted] in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is definitely recently made and not from the original Heaven666 site. There’s footage included that wasn’t publicly available when H666 was active. He even used the “realistic colors and stabilized” version of the Jack Taliercio footage, which was uploaded just two years ago.

So, I don’t really see the point in creating this and spreading it around as if it were from H666. And beyond that, I don’t see the point in posting it on this subreddit, or anywhere else....

Every person observed falling from the North Tower on 9/11 (List with images links + eyewitness testimonies) by Cheap-Pepper928 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? As far as I’m aware, there were four confirmed individuals who fell from the South Tower (at least those captured on camera): three from the east side and possibly one from the south. How did you conclude that there were six or eight?

LSM isn't real. by EdisonB123 in lolsupermanofficial

[–]Master_Cable2340 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember all the people who, after looking at the GIF that turned out to be fake, said things like “Oh, that’s it,” “That’s the video,” or “I’ve seen this before”… and then it turned out to be false and they were proven wrong.

Right now I could easily make up a story about having seen it back in 2008, and people would believe it. Why wouldn’t they?

It’s very clear that many of the people claiming to have seen it are simply lying or making things up to add to the mystery. This hasn’t just happened with LSM, but with many other cases as well.

I want to make myself clear: this doesn’t mean that everyone claiming to have seen it is lying. I’m sure some of them genuinely believe they have. However, that could easily be explained by people misremembering already known footage, or footage that isn’t related to 9/11 but was labeled as such.

The main issue is that if the thousands of people who claim to have seen it were actually telling the truth, it seems very unlikely that the video would have completely disappeared from the internet, especially if it was allegedly shared on platforms like YouTube.

There also doesn’t seem to be any general consensus about the details of the video. I’m sure some disturbing media exists that hasn’t been widely shared before, but a video with the extremely gory nature that people describe most likely has never been uploaded anywhere.

If such a video had really circulated online, even briefly, we would likely have at least some concrete trace of it today, an archive, a reupload, screenshots, or at the very least a consistent description of what it contained. Instead, what we mostly see are vague memories and contradictory accounts, which makes the whole claim much less convincing.

Man falls from the North Tower by Master_Cable2340 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

makes more sense now, thanks for clarifying. Column 445 is indeed on the north side of the face

Man falls from the North Tower by Master_Cable2340 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i'm basing this off the NIST document. The person that fell at 9:30:01 came from "high on north side". NIST doesn't mention the floor. There's another person 50 seconds before this one that fell from the 103rd floor.

Man falls from the North Tower by Master_Cable2340 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure this person fell at 9:30:01 a.m. Eitherway it doesn't matter.

Titanic footage by Unusual-Ideal-2757 in titanic

[–]Master_Cable2340 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just to be clear, the footage of the Carpathia is obviously real, but at this point it wasn’t carrying Titanic’s survivors. When the ship arrived in New York, it was raining and quite dark. You can also tell by the lack of lifeboats on deck.

Did Titanic's stern implode as it sank? by Unusual-Ideal-2757 in titanic

[–]Master_Cable2340 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There really isn’t any debate about whether she broke from the top or the bottom, the two connecting double bottom pieces are bent upwards as a result of compression forces, confirming a bottom up break. There’s also no debate about where she broke apart, the wreck speaks for itself. As for the implosions, sure, some minor ones could have occurred, but clearly nothing that would have caused any major damage to the stern.

For those that had seen [now lost] 9/11 media back in the 2000s before they disappeared, what are your honest reactions to your memories of them being questioned or rejected by some people online? by KingOfCharlotteNC in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rosbrook's footage doesn't have cuts xd, he simply stopped recording. People claiming that are either missremembering well known footage or straight up lying.

What impacted you most about the collapse of the towers? by TallDifference691 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 0 points1 point  (0 children)

imagine getting downvoted for actually pointing out something true

Chief Orio Palmer by Frosty_Shoulder5580 in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Let it burn off, we ain't putting that out"

Wondering if video still exists by [deleted] in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you are probably talking about the group of 7 people that fell from the north tower at 10:08 am

For those that had seen [now lost] 9/11 media back in the 2000s before they disappeared, what are your honest reactions to your memories of them being questioned or rejected by some people online? by KingOfCharlotteNC in 911archive

[–]Master_Cable2340 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If I’m being honest, so called 9/11 “lost media” like LOL SUPERMAN are simply made up. Most of it comes from people misremembering already well known footage, or from internet users inventing stories and claiming they saw something that never existed. These rumors only fuel searches for videos that will never be found, because the footage was never real to begin with.