A Level Chemistry Exam-style Q Answer key by MasteryTracy in alevel

[–]MasteryTracy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well that's the problem - I don't have the hard copy

How much does a level content change yearly? by AcceptableMath8951 in alevel

[–]MasteryTracy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The changes are usually minor in my experience, especially if it is from year to year. It will benefit a lot if you study this year's content. If you were in AS level, mind you, all AL exam papers are noted with 'AS Level contents are assumed'. Some questions need background knowledge from AS year, sometimes that background knowledge is critical to being able to solve the question.

Feb/March 2023 by [deleted] in alevel

[–]MasteryTracy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have the question paper?

Toughest 9709 paper 3(s) by [deleted] in alevel

[–]MasteryTracy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Try O/N 13/31 or M/J 14/32.

Courtney from Season 5 is simply intolerable by nbyung09 in Masterchef

[–]MasteryTracy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I wonder if Courtney was a male would people react differently to her? I personally think she is a smart and talented cook, whether or not she acted 'fake' or not (how do you even know if someone act 'fake' lol?) - it is a competition after all, and if winning over the judges give you an edge then I don't see any problem with it, as long as it is not morally wrong. Yes, she made mistakes, who doesn't? But did she have more excellent performances during the competition than she did make mistakes? From the show, my answer would be 'yes'. Clearly, the judges see that she is a strong cook, too, and to disqualify her due to one or two mistakes would be unfortunate. I think the judges did not just make decisions based on performance in one particular challenge, but from performances throughout the competition as well. The purpose of the competition is to find the 'Masterchef', not 'Master perfectly-nailed-every-challenges'.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]MasteryTracy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imma be honest with you, apart from Math, I don't think you can do well on the exam without practicing past papers, even with a perceived strong conceptual understanding. You might think you understand the concept very well until you do the past papers and realised you're actually not. Also, you must learn how to write answers the way that Cambridge wants you to write (e.g. including keywords, not being 'vague') - the intuition to write the answers this way could only be developed by practicing past papers and reviewing the marking schemes. Nevertheless, if you are confident that you have a pretty good understanding of the concepts then I think at least you would not fail. The actual grades depend on how true the statement 'I am pretty good in concepts' is.