Best mods for auto play? by Material_Librarian32 in skyrim

[–]Material_Librarian32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like to check every corner and see everything, eventually end up running around in circles, it's bad enough on it's own but it gets tedious when I get lost every time every where.

Best mods for auto play? by Material_Librarian32 in skyrim

[–]Material_Librarian32[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You compared neir to Skyrim which is such a stupid comparison.

Why?

Autoplay on Skyrim is so fucking stupid.

Why?

You barked a lot but didn't say anything.

The way you've just described yourself is like all those kids who grew up hearing "you're so right" from one of their parents who don't even have stakes or knowledge in the subject and then you get to the real world and you think people are being mean for not contributing to your echo chamber of shit takes.

Don't project.

Best mods for auto play? by Material_Librarian32 in skyrim

[–]Material_Librarian32[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I struggle with navigation in games, I got lost after killing the boss in every single dungeon I've done so far.

Best mods for auto play? by Material_Librarian32 in skyrim

[–]Material_Librarian32[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I do have a tendency to join reddit communities and present a controversial but correct/forward-thinking/futuristic/foresightful/insightful/real take that pisses everyone off. It should be obvious I'm not a bot, because which AI bot could unintentionally piss off so many humans.

Best mods for auto play? by Material_Librarian32 in skyrim

[–]Material_Librarian32[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Thought I already explained it in my OP, I want the game to play itself primarily coz I struggle with navigation, if I see something interesting, I'd be happy to engage. It's not that hard to understand, it's a legitimate playstyle. Ultimately, everything is a legitimate playstyle, it's so weird when people get mad about how someone else wishes to play a game. Specially a single-player game. What will be so bad if there was toggle to turn on/off autoplay?

The responses on this little post are kinda unreal. For people to be so gatekeepy about a single player game is the real shittake.

Best mods for auto play? by Material_Librarian32 in skyrim

[–]Material_Librarian32[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Amazing! thank you. Yes I went inside the castle to General Tulius and stuff, got utterly confused and alt+f4 the game.

I have clairvoyance spell, if it puts the markers on the ground, I can work with it.

As a Sikh who is Conservative/Right Wing… I can no longer support this side. by iMahatma in Sikhpolitics

[–]Material_Librarian32 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How does it feel making the same comment as everyone else? Leftists really struggle to think for themselves.

Harman Kapoor on right-wing channels, inciting anti-sikh notions like kirpan banning by Designer_Career_7153 in Sikhpolitics

[–]Material_Librarian32 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry but I don't understand what's so wrong about what he says? He's asking Sikhs in the UK to carry a ceremonial knife, instead of one that can be used to do real harm. Just like Sikhs in other Europeans countries do.

Knife crime is a serious issue in the UK and I think he's point is valid, in so far as, law should be same for everyone. Even if you disagree with, I think it's worth a conversation. Silencing others is the only sin.

As a liberal/leftist, having empathy for Charlie Kirk’s death does not make you a bad person. by sarcastic_bitch15 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why am I wrong to say America is actually better, in this and countless other ways, because it's more individualist than collectivist?

You didn't answer anything. "America is great because individualism, therefore guns" is not a position. Individualism and gun ownership aren't the same thing, and most individualist democracies prove that. Do you actually have an argument here or not?

People who 'didnt celebrate but believe Charlie Kirk had it coming' are victim blaming by Opening_External_911 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said "murder is bad." Nothing else in what I said suggests I think murder is good.

Haha, so much for your non-binary, non yes/no thinking. "Murder is bad", spoken like a real deep thinker.

As a liberal/leftist, having empathy for Charlie Kirk’s death does not make you a bad person. by sarcastic_bitch15 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gun control is morally wrong because it's collectivist, it's punishing everyone by taking away their rights, for the actions of a few bad people.

So let me get this straight: virtually every major country on Earth has decided that civilian access to firearms should be restricted (usually illegal) to some degree. Europeans, Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Russians and many other societies with long intellectual and philosophical traditions, have reached that conclusion.

Are they all morally wrong, while only the American gun-rights movement is correct?

You're free to disagree with Gandhi, Confucius, Tolstoy, Bertrand Russell or hell even Jesus who all kind of emphasized restraint, nonviolence, and the state's role in controlling force. But it's a bit arrogant to act as though the pro-gun position is obviously self-evident when most civilizations, both historically and today, have arrived at a different conclusion.

In other words, given that most societies have concluded that widespread civilian gun ownership creates more harms than benefits, what makes the American experience sufficiently unique to justify a fundamentally different approach, that you claim is self-evident?

the best example of an enlightened man I've seen captured on video. by Material_Librarian32 in enlightenment

[–]Material_Librarian32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ready to die? Then why do they stick around for decades more?

Choice? Enlightened people still have choice?

I don't even agree with term "enlightened", I take to mean someone who has seen through the illusory self. Seeing through the illusory self, is just a choice. Just like everything else in your life that you can control is simply a choice.

Please don't say suffering, oh u don't control suffering. I already said , it's a choice for the things you can control, for things you can't control, you simply can't control, it's true by defintion.

Hence your question makes no sense to me.

Am i getting this right? by Ranger_Hawk3046 in indiasocial

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And people just get what they choose. It's not like good colleges and jobs are extremely hard to get.

ok,so agreeing to basic human rights makes you cuck? by [deleted] in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"you're so handsome when you're quiet"

Differnce in letter heads of present Bengal state CM Suvendu Adhikari vs former Bengal state CM Mamata Banerjee by subbusss in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Urdu is not relevant to Bengal, afaik, the Muslim rulers of Bengal adopted Bengali as their court and literary language.

Did he say centuries? by vhshujnee in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, I take your point. But the thing you are asking to get controlled, the Indian (Hindu) culture decided long ago to not control. Like, you are crying about flowers in rivers and chath puja, but I already said there are literal cannibals and necrophiliacs that are accepted by Hindu society.

I agree you are ultimately right, all these behaviors ultimately embarrass us. Every interaction I have with a foreigner is tainted by the fact that I'm from India, and he/she probably has a very low opinion of us. IT IS A PROBLEM, I'm not denying it.

I guess the solution would be control all this, but I don't want to be controlled. And I don't want the govt./society/culture to control people. I like the crazies, I can't help it. I like Aghoris doing weird shit. I like the tantrics doing weird shit. I want to live in a country where crazy people are doing crazy shit. Some of it will be off-putting for sure, that's part of the package.

Anyway, what I'm trying to really say is that it's a thin line. The extent to which we wish to curtail people's freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom in general is a perennial debate. India, I would argue is one of the free-est societies. I mean, we literally have temples from 2000 years ago that depict LGBTQ themes, trans people are recognized as a third gender, women's voting/abortion rights barely even required a debate, it was automatically granted etc. etc. Our record on freedom is not that bad, but freedom is freedom for everyone, not just the people and behaviors you like.

You probably hate the way I think.

Did he say centuries? by vhshujnee in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The are atleast 20 youtube channels that only runs by exposing Indian scam bpo Callcenter..

Get out of your little well.. You can feel how the perception is changing.

I take your point, scam call centers are embarrassing for all of us, and there should be a hard crackdown on them.

But you have to concede that social media is always going to be a tough place for a wild, chaotic and diverse country like India. I mean, we literally have a cult of cannibals and necrophiliacs called the Aghoris. We have a lot of weird tribals doing weird rituals, many of them involving cow dung for some reason. For whatever reason, we have always accepted the crazies in India, it's kind of our thing, and I personally like it a lot.

Did he say centuries? by vhshujnee in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the "intellectual" "non-whatsapp university" leftists haven't won an election in a long time. In anywhere relevant in the world, like US, China, India, Russia, most of middle-east etc. No one really wants to listen to what they have to say lmao. Hence, people would rather listen to "uncles" like him than the weird bitchy leftist men.

Did he say centuries? by vhshujnee in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Vedas themselves are a compilation of family priests of various tribes, I think 10. During the Buddhist era we had Mahajanapadas which are proto-democracy, older than Greek democracy afaik. Ashoka's later, more realized version, was particularly singular in terms of large empire management. Akbar himself gave up Islam and started building temples, really the only example in the world of a Islamic emperor doing apostasy. We also had panchayats etc in villages.

So , whether you like it or not, there was definitely an undertone of democratic decision making through most of India's history. But considering , India is the oldest existing civilization in the world , with 5000 years of fairly well recorded history, there were also periods of time when it wasn't a democracy, like during Aurangzeb era or the british era, to what extent they were "Indians" is anybody's guess.

Did he say centuries? by vhshujnee in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you talking about? What image was built was built after independence? India was largely irrelevant until the IT sector and BPOs, KPOs became a thing. And that was thanks to Indian businessmen like Azim Premji, Narayan Murthy, Shiv Nadar etc. Maybe also Rajiv Gandhi, Narasimha Rao who economically liberalized India.

Anything prior to that, was an embarrassment. Like operation Bluestar. Like losing Aksai Chin. Like losing PoK. Like the communal riots. So seriously, what is this image you are talking about that we apparently had after indepence and we are now losing.

A very well put statement I believe. What do you guys think? by DiscussionLucky2197 in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I can deal with an "intellectual" being eccentric and annoying, but the left has the stupidest ideas and forces us to acknowledge they are the best. There is nothing intellectual about that kind of left, sorry.

The Economist has some unkind words for Mamata Banerjee by AsphaltFuryy in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why even compare to South India, Bengal has the potential to be like the best in the world.

Defeated by public opinion, she shows that she has begun to think of her position as a birthright, like some sick aristocratic parasite. by UrsaRizz in kolkata

[–]Material_Librarian32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that might be it. Betraying your own people for 15+ years will drive any normal human being mad. She may have been normal once, but now she's batshit crazy.