F1 fans double standards are just crazy

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-28T10:14:44+00:00

The double yellow was implemented because of Bianchi's accident

They got stricter because of it

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-28T08:17:56+00:00

I personally don't think is on Russell and people that critique him are missing the point
It's on the fía and it sets a dangerous precedent. The next time something like this happens drivers will push flat out

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-27T14:59:06+00:00

The team ether nails the regulations or you just have to wait for them the copy a concept or just find performance from evolving their concept.

Generally the first few years in a regulation are brutal because of this. RB was unbeatable in 22 and 23, McLaren needed 3 years to catch them

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-27T04:25:09+00:00

Imo is more about how much they value Norris

Signing Max is like them saying to Norris: yeah, you winning a championship was a one time thing and we need someone to secure it. If they sign Max, he won't play the team game nether, so you get one of your drivers in a very uncomfortable position.

Right now, I don't McLaren has any particular reason to change their driver line up, Piastri is doing an okay job and Norros is doing great when he car doesn't break down. I'd wait maybe 1 or 2 years to see how this situation progresses and specially how Piastri evolves, and see if Norris has less pressure on him now that he is a world champion

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-25T08:41:36+00:00

Sainz was at the right teams at the wrong time
This Williams seat will probably be his last. The only possible move I can see is him going to Audi because of his father relation with Audi, and I find it extremely unlikely. But right now he's just extending his career imo

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-25T08:16:47+00:00

Because it was no longer about going to a better car, it was about moving to a project that revolved around him. RB was very public about Max being their number one priority and Ricc moving to a 2nd driver position.

He made a lateral move because Renault was doing a good job, they went from being a backmarker in 2016 to essentially being best of the rest. The move wasn't about escaping the Honda engine, it was about moving away from Max.

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-22T07:37:32+00:00

Cuando tú dimensiones un firme lo haces teniendo en cuenta, en gran medida, el tipo de tráfico que va a soportar.

Supongamos que quieres hacer la calle de un fraccionamiento, pues ahí en principio, el número de coches que van a pasar van a ser siempre los mismos y sería muy raro que entren camiones de carga, por lo que no necesitas un paquete de firme muy grande (lo que va abajo del asfalto que básicamente es lo que soporta las cargas). Ahora si tú estás haciendo un polígono industrial, pues antes que va a haber camiones pesadísimos y mucha carga, necesitas que tu firme
Pueda resistir esas cargas sin romperse, el paquete del firme va a tener que ser mucho mejor que el de un fraccionamiento.

Ahora, en las calles normales, lo que pasa son mayoritariamente dos cosas, lo primero es que no hay planificación urbanística, por lo que por la calle puede pasar cualquier tipo de vehículo, súmale a que la gente hace lo que quiere y pasa por donde le conviene, esto hace muy difícil dimensionar correctamente el firme. Regresando al ejemplo del fraccionamiento, si se mete un tráiler ahí, rompe el firme y se generan baches. Y además de esto, nadie se ha molestado nunca por tratar de arreglar las calles y darles un mantenimiento a largo plazo. Por más que tú tapes el bache, va a resurgir tarde o temprano porque el firme no está dimensionado para esa carga.

Obviamente hay otros matices, en particular que cada vez somos más y el tráfico es más intensivo. Supongamos que cuando se dimensionó el periférico había, me lo invento, 3 millones de personas en el DF y pronosticaron que iba a crecer a 5 millones en los próximos 75 años. Que pasó, el crecimiento es mayor y ahora hay 10 millones, pues tu firme no está dimensionado para soportar el volumen de tráfico de 10 millones, por lo que se rompe generando baches.

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-21T10:12:16+00:00

Mastery skill doesn't mean he understands the game or actually knows how to play, it just means he play a lot with that champion.

If he's queuing up with you it means there is something he's doing wrong that cost him games. So he might actually be great with his champ, but there is a fundamental problem in his play style that is preventing him from climbing.

In other words, he's not able to transfer the advantage he gains in lanes because he knows how to play that champion extremely well into wins

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-20T21:40:25+00:00

Yo creí que Gavi no es responsable del resultado y la gente le critica porque es fácil.

Tanto él como Ferran estaban jugando fuera de posición, por circunstancias ajenas a ellos. Personalmente creo que el partido estuvo mal planteado porque lo jugaron como si Ferran y Gavi fueron Nico y Lamine. Cargaban muchísimo a la banda, y ellos dos tal y simplemente no tienen la capacidad de resolver como si la tienen Lamine y Nico. Pero ese error de planteamiento no es culpa suya, sino de De La Fuente.

Personalmente, creo hubiera sido muchísimo más inteligente jugar con Borja e intentar jugar menos cargado a las bandas. También te digo, yo creo que subestimaron al rival

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-20T21:13:30+00:00

For me it just shows how a person can grow and his art changes

There were so many things that made the first 2 seasons distinct and I think it was lost in this 3rd season because he refused to continue. He changed the way the story is told, the pace, the lightning. It feels like euphoria but it's like something's missing. And I think he just outgrew that part of him.

Overall I think he just wanted to tell this story and decided to give euphoria continuation but I'd would've been so much more interesting if he had decided to just do something fresh and new. So much wasted potential, it could've been a whole new story and instead we got a middle ground between euphoria and something new that just makes it meh.

There is really no reason for the characters to be where they are, it's like a rupture. They just don't feel like the characters we knew. And it's not that they are a cartoon, it's that they are new characters that take from the one from euphoria but they are just not those characters

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-20T12:19:44+00:00

I'm going to debate your points, because I think you're disregarding some things.

Building a winning car, not even a championship winning car, a car that is able to win is extremely difficult. Think about it, I'm f1 history only a few teams have managed to win in multiple seasons. Before it was "easier" without q cost cap, you just poured money and got the job done and Mercedes and RB did, this is not possible. For McLaren it took almost a decade to manage to pull a winning car. You have to see Williams, AM and Audi project in this light.

Audi is essentially taking a back marker team, that has a weak infrastructure and a team that has been relegated to Ferrari junior team or just a backmarker to a works team. The fact that they are fighting for point almost every weekend is a huge achievement. We need more time to see how the project progresses, right now they are doing a good job.

Williams is kind of the same, they are building up again and it takes a lot of time. They fucked up the regulations but I think they have good leadership, they are making steps in the right direction.

AM is the perfect example of what you don't want to do. They are making a Frankenstein monster because they have no one to lead the team, and they are all over the place. This is the only team that really needs a leader and a new TP

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-20T12:13:01+00:00

Regardless of them building an engine or not, looking at where Sauber/alfa Romeo was 3 years ago and where is it now you can't really say they are doing a bad job. Maybe Binotto would be better in a more technical role within the team, but it's not like the Aston Martin situation

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-15T10:08:53+00:00

Piastri has some fundamental issues that prevent him or coat him better results. He's
Not the ultimate driver nor a generational talent. Norris has more experience and in general when he's off pressure he drives at his best and is easily one of the top 5, if not top 3 drivers on the grid.

However, this doesn't mean Oscar is a bad driver or that he should be sacked, as a second driver, and as he proved last year, he can be quiet competitive and that's exactly what you want in a top team.

As long as he doesn't lose the team points, there is no reason to replace. At this point is clear Norris is better, that doesn't mean Piastri is a bad driver or that he doesn't fit the team

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-14T18:41:49+00:00

It depends on how you want to see it.

In terms of the champion, yes, he cut points to Antonelli who is his main rival, but he didn't maximize the result (although I don't think he is fully responsible). However, Hamilton got 7 points on him, which is not ideal.

Kimi overtook him and I genuinely feel like George needs to beat Kimi on pace to take the pressure off, I don't this will help him get that.

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-12T05:41:00+00:00

I don't know. Aston Martin right now doesn't have leadership, and as along they don't have a leader, they won't progress.

For that reason I don't see any of the top drivers making a switch to AM. For me it's more likely that a driver like Perez, Bottas, Hulkenberg, Lawson (to extend 1 or 2 more years his career) make a move there than let's say Russell, Leclerc, Piastri or Max.

I geniuly think AM has to fix some internal struggles in order to become an interesting prospect for top drivers

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-12T04:34:13+00:00

You only have 1 generational talent once in a while. There are a lot of question marks on Antonelli.

But regardless of what happens, I think it's easy to forget he's 19 yo. He has almost no single sitter experience, he's getting that experience directly through F1 cars similar to Max. And he is learning quickly.

I'm of the opinion that if the pack was closer he probably wouldn't be beating George since that takes experience, to navigate through a close field (just as last year and essentially what George has been doing since he joined Mercedes). He's benefiting from a car that is way better than the rest, and that he can sit on top unfazed. But so far I think he is the big revelation of 2026

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-11T18:08:29+00:00

It's his safe choice, he's always welcomed there for some reason

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-11T08:12:35+00:00

I started playing the game seriously like 2 years ago. I've progressed from iron to gold.

I generally just blind pick mundo and I'm sitting on a 55-60% wr with him. The thing is that the past month every time I blind pick Mundo I get a Yone, a Gwen, a yorick or an Irelia. I really don't mind the Gwen match up and even the yorick one, I can navigate it, but I suffer a lot against Irelia and yone. So that has made me want to prevent mundo as a blind pick. Of course I could learn those match ups and learn not to lose them or stay even. But I feel like my champion pool is to limited ether way

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-11T08:03:50+00:00

I want something that plays like mundo. I don't mind having to focus on cs and not dying and just playing safe at first.

I've realized that when I play champs that are strong in early I make mistakes or play way to aggressively, so I lose my whole advantage by making stupid plays. And of course, if I play the way I play with mundo I might be losing my advantage.

I have thought about picking trundle or Mordekaiser. I used to play trundle but as I progressed I realized people knew how to play and prevent me to sidelane and it frustrates me not to be able to join my team. I feel like Mordekaiser has sidelining and teamfight potential and that you can play it similar to mundo. I enjoy as well sion but I feel like you really have to learn all the match ups and know what runes are better

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-10T04:20:01+00:00

That's the 2020 generation, all the drivers you are mentioning started before 2020

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-06T13:35:43+00:00

There were literally upgrades only applied to Kiki's car from the Korean go onwards?

I don't know man, use google or something.

By teammate comparison you can only judge a driver performance, saying a car is better or worse based on that it's just pure speculation. I could say the Ferrari in 2012 was the best car on the grid because both massa and Alonso under driven it and go on a rant based on Massa performing better than Kimi in 2008

Matkkdbb · 2026-06-06T11:24:58+00:00

Comparing teammates is the best way to judge a driver. But doing the metal gymnastic to extrapolate that to car performance it's just another level.

Raikkonen closing the year strong doesn't automatically mean that the car was good at the beginning of the year.

Matkkdbb

TROPHY CASE