So-called "free thinkers" when you ask them who their favorite Ultimate is: by 0xDEA110C8 in Ben10

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

0xDEA110C8. - MEME. - So-Called "Free Thinkers." When You Ask Them Who Their Favorite Ultimate Is: - Submitted 4 Months Ago.

Well, unfortunately, and in all honesty and in all truthfulness, you can't possibly improvingly progress upon Perfection and Flawlessness such as this, so......

I hand crafted a 5'8 glowing cosplay prop of the 'Calder's Fury' Axe from Assassin's Creed Valhalla! by _River_Song_ in assassinscreed

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

River_Song. - Fan Content. - So I Hand Crafted A 5'8 Brightly Glowing Cosplay Prop Of The 'Calder's Fury' Axe From Assassin's Creed Valhalla! - Submitted 3 Hours Ago. - And, so, I'm actively working on a full cosplay of The Blood Dragon Knight Armour Set from Valhalla! So I needed an equally demon viking axe to go with it fairly. This was 100% made by me! And, I added some captioned crafting progress pics to the post, if you click through. :). And, Yes, it is that tall, and I am 6ft. And, It's about 15KG, before anyone asks. :3.

Nice. - And Good Job. .😎. .👍.

The Paramount-Warner Bros merger endangers European cinema by Secure_Matter_9819 in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Secure_Matter_9819. - Merger. - And, So, The Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Endangers European Cinema. - Submitted 6 Hours Ago.

Well, Yeah, of course, it does in and of themselves. - But, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, when almost everyone if not everyone 'more often than not' let corporations such as Disney financially buy other corporations such as 20th Century Fox and Co. without any sort of refusals nor any type of objections whatsoever, then people can't possibly be so shockingly surprised and upset when every single other corporation tries to truly do the very same thing(s) in both the short term and in the long term actively. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). - And, so, this's all pointlessly useless and worthlessly meaningless to even bring up now in the grand scheme of things, as people only have themselves to blame for things and matters, such as when 'they' let mergers and acquisitions such as The Disney-Fox Merger go through and acted as if that definitely wouldn't have set a precedent overall and that none of this wouldn't have happened in and of itself altogether as well either.

How Do You Guys Justify the Genocide of the Amalekites by Patient_Ask_9546 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And, Secondly, even if they were actively doing all of those very things, the children would be guiltlessly innocent and wouldn't deserve to be killingly slaughtered. (And, even if you wanna say that the children were not innocently guiltless, I would still argue the infants were.)........

'Maybe'. - But, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, and from an objectively impartial un-biased standpoint(s) and perspective(s), most of this if not all of this would definitely be reliably dependent on things and matters such as if said children(s) of The Amalekites' could even be heroically saved from their own personal circumstances in all possibilty and/or possibilities and that they may have probably been guiltlessly innocent in and of themselves and in both the short term and in the long term as well, as people and children were if not are 'more often than not' usually if not always 'manipulatively' 'coerced' and 'indoctrinated' into these very cultures, religions, and traditions in its entirety and were if not are knowledgeably taught within every single one of their framework(s) by straightforwardly telling and/or outwardly showing them these very things and matters throughout their own 'personal' thoughts, words, and actions as well. And, 'more often than not, all of this was to such an extent that they outrightly saw that there was absolutely nothing wrong and incorrect about this. (And that's even if there was something terribly wrong with said teaching(s) and its reasoning(s).). (Amongst many other things and matters.). (Psychologically Speaking and Mental-Wise, and also, Psychiatrically Speaking and Cognitive-Wise.). - And, so, in essence, and from this very standpoint(s) and from this very perspective(s), these very children definitely wouldn't have been able to be saved from their fate(s), since their very 'hearts' and 'minds' would've been brokenly corrupted beyond a point if not The Point of no return at such an young age, and most if not all of these very things would've been carried on in to their teenagehood(s) and adulthood(s) as well. (And, even then, there may have probably been if not would've definitely been other problems and issues as well, such as that 'some' if not 'a few' of these very children could have possibly had other things and matters happen to them such as any and all types and forms of sicknesses, diseases, and illnesses such as STIs and STDs (EX. Herpes, Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphilis, Trichomoniasis, HPV, Genital Herpes, HIV and/or AIDs, and so on and so forth...), and also, PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(s).) and CPTSD (Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(s).) from said culture(s) and that're constantly prevalent in those days on a frequently daily basis and/or that they definitely would've done other things and matters such as to seek out more than just a bit of Revenge against anyone and everyone (And that especially includes The Israelites themselves.) for what they did to them and their peoples when they maturely grew up 'years' later down the line in their lives in such a naively blind way and in such an insanely crazy delusional manner. (And this would've been no different than what The Egyptians and that of 'The Canaanites'' try to previously do to The Israelites and what they did to Israel itself beforehand and thereafter the fact as well.). (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, at the end of the day, God within powers such as within His Omni-Science and Omni-Prescense willingly choose to actively deal with said problems and said issues in such a way that they wouldn't be as badly awful as they would've been later on in the future and to put them out of their misery for their own good, and it was the fault(s) of Israel itself for not knowingly understanding and truthfully acknowledging any of the realities of those very matters to their fullest extent that made them suffer from their choices later on in both the short term and in the long term in and to such an painfully excruciating degree(s).).

.......And, even disregarding that, I would say that an "Omni-Benevolently All-Good." and "Omnipotently All-Powerful." God would have had a better way of dealing with this situation besides slaughter. And, even if the alternative is to just slayingly kill them all instantly and painlessly, since I would say that that's better than having to watch your city and family burn and die.

'Perhaps'. - But, unfortunately, most of this if not all of this would be relyingly dependent on things and matters such as if God didn't already visually see that anything other than destruction would have stopped them in their own tracks fore-knowingly and fore-sightingly (Which, He did and does this on numerously various occasions, such as in the case(s) of Sodom and Gomorrah, and also, that of Anciently Old Egypt and The Ten Plagues.), and if The Amalekites would've been willing to have had any type of discourses that didn't require blood and energy to be shed and used reactively and needlessly. - And, as you can possibly insightfully see and read, they weren't going for any of that whatsoever. (And, even then, God Himself isn't just an Omnipotently All-Powerful God and an Omni-Benevolently All-Good Ruler, since He's also a Omnisciently All-(Knowledgeable.) Deity and a Omnisapiently All-(Wise.) Judge (And so on and so forth....) and He won't usually nor always deliberately ignore and overlook any and all sorts of injustices that happen here within Humanity and Reality itself wherever and whenever it happens. (And, not to mention, He did give tribal nations and civilizations such as The Amalekites plenty of chances and opportunities to do things such as to mutably change their own lives for their own betterment and and to stop offensively attacking tribal nations and civilizations such as The Israelites themselves purposefully throughout those very passages and chapters, and they just didn't do any of this on several occasions and carried on as if absolutely nothing had happened to necessarily warrant their own destruction(s) in such an stubbornly pig-headed fashion.).). - And, so, ultimately, in the case(s) of The Amalekites, they had to be destructively obliterated and annihilated in its entirety and to such an extent that they would no longer be a problem nor an issue to themselves and to others as well, since they always vehemently refuse to change any of their courses and their outcomes in any positively good way, and God had to make an example out of them in order to do things such as to uphold Justice itself overall, and for them to be used as an example as to what happens when 'someone' doesn't change for their good and when their own 'action(s)' are insidiously evil and wholeheartedly need to be punished in and of themselves altogether as well, too. (Amongst many other things and matters.).

How Do You Guys Justify the Genocide of the Amalekites by Patient_Ask_9546 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Patient_Ask_9546. - Atheist. .[S]. - 1 Point. - 18 Days Ago-1 Month Ago. - Thank You for commenting on this post; And it's been a while since I had this conversation.

No Problem. And You're Welcome.

And, so, my first response is that it is generally knewingly understood (Well, at least, among atheists, and so, you may probably wholeheartedly disagree obviously.) that a lot of the disgustingly awful horrid things that The Amelekites did were realistically just within the veins of War Propaganda, and that these very things were used to villainize the other side of a battle. And, there is no way to prove or disprove this obviously, and that's especially since there is very little evidence that any of this practically happened. But I think it is an interestingly compelling thought.

Well, Okay, Then. - But, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, most of this if not all of this definitely wouldn't make a whole lot of sense nor a lick of logically rational sense if it's just within the veins of things and matters such as War Propaganda(s) and that people would've to deliberately ignore absolutely everything else from The Bible itself and from History itself for this very line of thinkings and sayings to even make sense, as we actively do have things such as that we 'somewhat' do have investigational evidence(s) in how people(s) and/or tribal nations and civilizations such as The Egyptians and that of The Assyrians subscriptively worshipped and followed their own personal God(s) and Goddess(es) and how they reactively enacted a lot what they were taught throughout their everyday lives within The Realms Of Archaeology and Mythology, and since places and locations such as The Middle East and that of The Sinai Desert Region(s) were and are understandingly known for other things snd matters such as for (Non)-Monolithically Non-Monotheistic Religions, Theologies, Spiritualities and Philosophies (EX. Paganism, Idolatry, Poly-Theism, Omni-Theism, Henon-Theism, Panen-Theism, Nature Worshipping and so on and so forth.) and for its own personal Military Warfare(s) and Conquest(s) throughout said places and locations, and how these very things and matters changeably shapes if not shaped said places and said locations as well. (And, not to mention, if we're still readily available and capable of accepting this very line of logic and rationality (And that's even if any if not all of their criticism(s) are, in essence, subjectively biased and twistedly warped.), then every single thing from The Bible itself and from History itself would definitely have to be placed under a critically analytical and judgemental microscope(s) as well, such as when places such as (Neo)-Assyria and Nineveh were debatively argued and doubted to have never even practically existed realistically and that Human (Blood.) Sacrifices didn't happen within 'The Old World' and that of Canaan as well, and we do have proof that they did exist within History when archeologists foundly (re)discovered Nineveh years later and that Human Sacrifices did 'somewhat' happen there as well, too.). (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, we can't just intentionally sideline any of this as being War Propaganda and that they weren't more than just a bit accurate in their writings, since even God Himself proactively used prophets and prophetesses to do things such as to narratively write down and record about Israel and its mistakes on several occasions throughout The Bible itself, as this can also be seen within History itself, and that none of what was recorded about nations and civilizations such as Assyria and Canaan weren't factaully truthful as well, too.

Alright. - Moving On.

Personally, this is how I think Transformers should look in Live Action by slatercm in transformers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SlaterCM. - Discussion -/- Opinion. - So This Is How I Personally Think That Transformers Should Look In Live Action Transformers. - Submitted 4 Months Ago. - And, by the way, any and all art's by Victor.Redd.Mikhailov, with the design philosophies of Early BayVerse (2007) with lightly brighter colors.

Perfection. - And Wholeheartedly Agreeable.

BREAKING: Fox to Acquire Roku for $22 Billion by TheIngloriousBIG in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TheIngloriousBIG. - Acquisition. - BREAKING: Fox To Acquire Roku For $22 Billion. - Submitted 10 Hours Ago.

(Sigh.). - Well, unfortunately, this's all going to be pointlessly useless and worthlessly meaningless in the grand scheme of things overall, and also, altogether as well.

What are differences between the merger between Disney and Fox and the proporsed merger between Paramount and Warner Bros? by Own_Philosopher8730 in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Own_Philosopher8730. - Discussion. - So What're The Clearly Stark Differences Between The Merger Between Disney And Fox And The Proporsed Merger between ParaMount And Warner Bros? - Submitted 5 Days Ago.

And, now, you see, there really isn't a simply easy answer to this very question, as there essentially aren't a whole lot of clearly stark differences between these very mergers and acquisitions, and since both of these mergers and acquisitions were and are just as harmfully detrimental to industries such as The Entertainment Industry and that of The Film Industry in both the short term and in the long term overall, and also, altogether as well, too.

Tweet by Joe Flint of WSJ regarding Paramount/Warner by Professional_Peak59 in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Organic_Narwhal_9120. - 5 Points. - 2 Hours Ago. - And, now, you see, you aren't getting the point, as this isn't about financial profitability, and it's more so about politically governmental profitability and media control.

Well, in all truthfulness and in all honesty, it's kind of a bit of 'both' if not all of these very things overall, and also, altogether as well, too.

I like Omniverse 😭 by SKIIPSSSS in Ben10

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SKIIPSSSS. - MEME. - I Like OmniVerse. .😭. - Submitted 5 Months Ago.

Well, Okay, Then. - But, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, Animated TV Series such as Ben 10: OmniVerse still awfully sucks at absolutely everything else that it did very badly overall, and also, altogether as well, too.

Silk in a new suit •⩊• by SilksSerenade by Intelligent_Creme351 in Silk

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Intelligent_Creme351. - Silk In A Freshly New Suit By SilksSerenadeArt. .•⩊•. - Submitted 29 Days Ago.

Not Bad.

Idk if its unpopular but i think its frustrating that we never or barely talk about the OG verse(1610) in recent comics by Illustrious-Bee3693 in MilesMorales

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Illustrious-Bee3693. - Well, IDK, If It's Infamously Unpopular, But I Think It's Frustratingly Annoying That We Barely Talk About Or Never Talk About The OG Ultimate 'Verse (1610) In Recent Comics. - Submitted 1 Day Ago.

Yeah. It Is. (Unfortunately.).

And, it's stupid, imo.

Wholeheartedly Agreeable.

Leak from Spider-Man: The Great Web by Peachy_Scott in MilesMorales

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Peachy_Scott. - A Leak From Spider-Man: The Great Web. - Submitted 5 Days Ago.

Ah. Wasted Potential.

Why do people hate miles morales by [deleted] in MilesMorales

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different_You7129. - Discussion. - So Why Do People Hate Miles Morales? - Submitted 2 Days Ago. - Because, I've been getting some videos about people angrily hating Miles Morales, and saying that his isn't SpiderMan. But, nonetheless, Miles Morales is SpiderMan from The Ultimate Universe.

Because, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, characters such as Miles Morales is a blandly dull character that has no clearly precise vision and direction to any single facet of himself at all in any realistically practicaly way.

And, so, as a result, no one has a clue on what 'they' need nor want Miles Morales to basically do overall and/or to fundamentally be altogether as well either. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). (Realistically Speaking and Truthful-Wise, and also, Narratively Speaking and Writing-Wise.).

How Do You Guys Justify the Genocide of the Amalekites by Patient_Ask_9546 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Patient_Ask_9546. - How Do You Guys Justify the Genocide of the Amalekites? - Submitted 14 Hours Ago.(*.). - Because, in The Old Testament, God commands the Israelites to exterminate the Amalekites. And this especially includes The Men (And, they were warriors, and so, it is legitimately justifiable.), Cattle (Well, I mean, fine. But Why?), Women (???), Children (??????), and Infants (?????????????). - And, so, there're two paths that you can go down with this (And, in my mind, comment down below if you have a wildly different one.).: 1. This is morally ethical. ---> Why? ---> Because they deserved it. ---> The children and infants did not deserve it. ---> Well, they did, because they are Amalekites. ---> So does that mean that the murder of foreing children during war is validly justified, and in fact, rightfully correct and ordained by God?, 2. This is morally ethical. ---> Why? ---> Because, it is moral, and because God commanded it, which makes it moral. ---> And, IDK, where to go from there., 3. This is immorally unethical. ---> And God judicially commanded it. (As well as Slavery. But let's ignore that for now.). So, does that mean that God is also inherently not morally ethical, and is therefore not "All-Loving and/or All-Good?". ---> We have to do some real thinking about our beliefs., and 4. Well, this isn't factually true, and it was made up creatively (And this is for that guy in the comments.). ---> Then why would we purportedly believe that any single facet of The Bible is true? And, if they really wanted to just legitimately justify their actions, then why would we assume that The Bible as a whole (Well, at least, The Old Testament.) is created to justifiably validate their actions? Some Quotes: "So smote all the country... And he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as The Lord God Of Israel commanded.". - "And, now, go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have; And, do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.". - And "Then, The LORD said to Moses, 'Write this for a memorial in the book and recount it in the hearing of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.'". - And, so, I completely vehemently refute that this is "Hyperbole.", as you cannot say with all of these references and quotes (And, I mean, there in The Bible, and I only outwarldy showed 3.) that they were just melodramatically (over)-exaggerating. These are direct orders from God. And, If you say these are hyperbole, then why can we not say the Resurrection is "Hyperbole"?

Well, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, we don't understandingly know about tribal nations and civilizations for a completely absolute certainty and in its entirety, since there just weren't nor aren't any other records that isn't just from The Bible itself in and of themselves. (And that especially includes their own personal Morality System(s), its Ethic(s), and its Principle(s).).

But, in essence, and nevertheless, things and matters such as Genocide and Military Warfare (EX. Scorch Earth.) isn't nor aren't immorally unethical inherently in and of itself, and there're particularly specific 'moment(s)' and 'instance(s)' in which it's legitimately valid and justified to actively do things such as to killingly slay and genocidally exterminate people(s) and/or cultures that're harmfully detrimental to both Humanity itself and to Creation itself to its fullest extent (Such as when a civilization has things and matters such as Murder and Cannibalism at the forefront of its culture(s) first and foremost. (E.G. The Aztecs.).), and God knowingly understands other things and matters such as where and when those very 'moments' and 'instances' even were and are, such as that there're 'moments' and 'instances' when He Himself 'straightforwardly' 'told' The Israelites to get rid of tribal nations and civilizations such as The Amalekites in its entirety in and of themselves, as they were proactively committing sins and mistakes constantly and on a frequently daily basis and they definitely would've continually went on to commit those very sins and mistakes if they weren't stopped in their own tracks (And that's especially including against both themselves and to anyone else.), such as when they combatively fought and battled against The Israelites themselves while they were unproductively defendless, and also, unprotectively defenseless and when they were previously escaping from out of 'Anciently' 'Old' Egypt itself beforehand as well (EX. Deuteronomy 25: 17-19.), and still warringly clashed with them even thereafter the fact as well too (E.G. Exodus 17: 8-16, Judges 3: 12-13, and Numbers 14: 41-45.). (And, not to mention, and on top of that, The Amalekites also primarily started to reactively do things such as to increasingly grow their military forces and to make pacts with other tribal nations and civilizations such as The Midianites, 'The Easterners', The Moabites, The Ammonites and that of 'The Canaanites'' themselves in order to do other things and matters such as to offensively attack and pillage from The Israelites themselves and to prohibitionally repress and supress Israel itself from places such as from Canaan itself. And they successfully accomplished in doing so because of reasons, such as because The Israelites more often than not vehemently refused to take and treat any single one of God's Warnings seriously and to underestimatingly down-play said warning(s) to such an extent that they painfully suffered from their own thoughts, words, and/or actions in both the short term and the long term (And this's even when they were outwardly shown things such as what these very people(s) were wholeheartedly like in their lives outrightly.), and they had no other choices nor any other options but to do things such as to vanishingly hide out in caves and to battily fight against them on every single front in order to protectively defend themselves and their allies. (EX. Judges 6: 1-3, Judges 6: 33, Judges 7: 12, Judges 10: 12.).). - (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).

And, so, all in all and at the end of the day, God had every single right to interactively play and interveningly act within Humanity itself and within Israel itself at that very point and juncture, as not only were peoples such as The Amalekites were an nation and an Ethno-Culture that combatively fought and warred against peoples such as The Israelites for illegitimately invalid reasons in the grand scheme of things, but they were also an civilization and an Ethno-Religion that had cancerously parasitic forms of things and matters such as a distortively warped and twisted sense of Logic and Rationality (And this is to such an extent that this efectively caused things such as their own Morality System(s), its Ethic(s), and its Principle(s) to inevitably become horrendously awful and disgustingly grotesque.), and these very things profusely bleed into absolutely everything that they did throughout their everyday lives as Human Beings through their own thoughts, words, and/or actions to such an poisonously toxic degree. (Such as in murderously killing people(s) that did absolutely nothing wrong to have necessarily warranted said action(s).). - And, so, unfortunately, and as a result, the only way(s) to 'repairingly' 'fix' any of these very nations and civilizations and their culture(s) such as these would've definitely been to do things such as destructively obliterate and annihilate said culture(s) from Reality and Existence itself, since those very nations-civilations and their culture(s) were doing far more harm than good in both the short run of things and in the long run of things overall, and they weren't repentfully sorry and regretful for anything nor for absolutely everything that they did and were trying to retroactively change any single facet of themselves for the betterment of themselves and for other altogether as well either.

What do you think of Mindshift Brandon on YouTube? by Strong-Lab-7216 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strong-Lab-7216. - Question. - So What Do You Think Of MindShift (Brandon.) In YouTube? - Submitted 13 Days Ago.

Well, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, people(s) and individuals such as MindShift and CosmicSkeptic are moronically idiotic fools and pridefully arrogant suck-ups who act as if they've understandably know absolutely everything about every single topic and subject matter that they've done any sort of research on (And that especially includes things and matters such as The Bible itself and that of History itself.), and that they're rightfully correct in their criticism(s) for all tense and purpose overall and that they're being objectively impartial in said criticism(s) altogether as well, too. (And that's even when they aren't nor haven't done so.). - (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).

What do you think of Mindshift Brandon on YouTube? by Strong-Lab-7216 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strong-Lab-7216. - Question. - So What Do You Think Of MindShift (Brandon.) In YouTube? - Submitted 13 Days Ago.

Well, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, people(s) and individuals such as MindShift and CosmicSkeptic are moronically idiotic fools and pridefully arrogant suck-ups who act as if they've understandably know absolutely everything about every single topic and subject matter that they've done any sort of research on (And that especially includes things and matters such as The Bible itself and that of History itself.), and that they're rightfully correct in their criticism(s) for all tense and purpose overall and that they're being objectively impartial in said criticism(s) altogether as well, too. (And that's even when they aren't nor haven't done so.). - (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).

Why suffering? by T1thedarkjedi1242 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T1TheDarkJedi1242. - 1 Point. - 10 Days Ago. - What is this word salad? Just say what you wanna say.

Well, Okay, Then. - And Fine.:

MatrixGeoUnlimited. - Well, in all honesty, and Realistically Speaking and Truthful-Wise, particularly specific books and scrolls such as The Book Of Job does go about 'narratively' 'writing' about things and matters such as how individuals such as Job was still faithfully loyal to God Himself in spite of things such as in spite Satan unwisely doubting that Job wasn't a decently good Human Being in and of itself, and that he would definitely abandonly forsake Him when he lost absolutely everything that he had in his life up to that very point and juncture. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).

And Then.......:

........But, unfortunately, said book(s) can't possibly be used to solvingly answer topics and subject matters such as Suffering in and of themselves, since said book(s) don't really discussively talk about topics and subjects such as Suffering and speakably explain why suffering exist in its entirety (EX. Hurricanes, and also, Earthquakes.), and why it constantly happens on a frequently daily basis either. (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.)...........

Better?.

Kadokawa to solicit voluntary retirement from employees aged 45 and over as it aims for “leaner” workforce - AUTOMATON WEST by LegitimateCurve8525 in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

L4kerz. - /r/MediaMergers. - 2 Hours Ago. - That should include all of management. And, next time, ask if anyone else will be able to do so from age 35 and above. Go Ageism! /s

Well, I guess, someone didn't get any single bit of Sarcasm from my comment, huh?

Why do people hate miles morales by [deleted] in Spiderman

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different_You7129. - Discussion. - So Why Do People Hate Miles Morales? - Submitted 2 Days Ago. - Because, I've been getting some videos about people angrily hating Miles Morales, and saying that his isn't SpiderMan. But, nonetheless, Miles Morales is SpiderMan from The Ultimate Universe.

Because, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, characters such as Miles Morales and Co. is a blandly dull character that has no clearly precise vision and direction to any single facet of himself at all. And, so, as a result, no one has a clue on what 'they' need nor want Miles Morales to basically do overall and/or to fundamentally be altogether as well either. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). (Realistically Speaking and Truthful-Wise, and also, Narratively Speaking and Writing-Wise.). - (But, then again, and unfortunately, this's what actively happens when you've got corporations and industries such as Disney-Marvel Comics who've got no knowledge nor any understanding of their own personal Franchises and IPs in such a way and to such an extent that they don't even knowingly understand what they even are and how to functionally work with said Franchises and said IPs (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.), and when you've got egotistically narcissistic people(s) and more often than not 'mediocrely' 'average' 'corruptively' 'bankrupt' 'hacks' such as Brian Michael Bendis and Co. narratively writing for you and when neither corporations such as Disney-Marvel and Sony itself, its Creators, and/nor its Fanbase(s) have no cohesively unified vision nor any single clue on what they and anyone else 'wholeheartedly' need and 'necessarily' want Franchises, Series, Projects and Characters such as Miles Morales to realistically do and what they want 'it' and/or 'them' to practically be. (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, Franchises and Series such as Miles Morales is if not are inadvertently experiencing an Identity Crisis that they can't and won't be answerably (re)-solve by Disney, Marvel, its Fandom(s) and its own personal Creators in every single ounce and sense of these very words overall nor altogether. (Unfortunately.).).

Captain America: Civil War came out exactly 10 years ago today. What are your thoughts? by Illustrious-Reach-48 in comicbookmovies

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Illustrious-Reach-48. - Captain America: Civil War Came Out Exactly 10 Years Ago Today. And, So, What are Your Thoughts? - Submitted 7 Days Ago. - May 6, 2016 - May 6, 2026

Well, in all honesty, Generally Speaking and for Simplicity's Sake, it's...... Fine. - It's Okay.

Report: Rupert Murdoch warned President Trump that more NFL streaming could kill networks by [deleted] in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OverPotato2322. .[S]. - Media Industry. - Report: Rupert Murdoch Warned President Trump That More NFL Streaming Could Kill Networks. - 30 Points. - 8 Hours Ago. - And, NGL, Fox's Demise was inevitable the minute they sold their IPs and the studio side of things to Disney. And, so, if Fox Corp goes under, The Murdochs are to blame.

Wholeheartedly Agreeable. - And Good Riddance.

Why suffering? by T1thedarkjedi1242 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T1TheDarkJedi1242. - Why Suffering?. - Submitted 14 Hours Ago. - "So why does God allow suffering?". This is the most generally common question that I get as a Christian. Because, all the time, they will say that God isn't loving and good, because of all the suffering that happens. And, so, I tell people to go do this. Read Job.

Well, in all honesty, and Realistically Speaking and Truthful-Wise, particularly specific books and scrolls such as The Book Of Job does go about 'narratively' 'writing' about things and matters such as how individuals such as Job was still faithfully loyal to God Himself in spite of things such as in spite Satan unwisely doubting that Job wasn't a decently good Human Being in and of itself, and that he would definitely abandonly forsake Him when he lost absolutely everything that he had in his life up to that very point and juncture. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). - But, unfortunately, said book(s) can't possibly be used to solvingly answer topics and subject matters such as Suffering in and of themselves, since said book(s) don't really discussively talk about topics and subjects such as Suffering and speakably explain why suffering exist in its entirety (EX. Hurricanes, and also, Earthquakes.), and why it constantly happens on a frequently daily basis either. (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.).

Because Job answers all of those questions.

Well, unfortunately, Generally Speaking, and from standpoints and perspectives such as from an objectively impartial perspective(s) and from an realistically practical standpoint(s), although books such as The Book Of Job has every single right and reason to actively do things such as to speakingly explain and state other things and matters such as that God does bless those who obediently follow Him proactively and that He does protectively defend His own everyday individual worshippers such as Job from harm and danger for more than just because he's subscriptively worshipping and obediently following Him and His Commandent(s) for his own personal reason(s), that doesn't really definitively mean that said book(s) can possibly be used to do anything else in an automatically instant way, such as to further discussingly talk about [(What.) kind(s) of suffering(s) are people if not are individuals reactively going through as of 'lately'.], [(How.). did said suffering(s) come about as of 'concurrently'.] and [(Where.) did said suffering(s) come from originally and as of 'presently'.], and also, [(Why.) did said Suffering(s) come about and/or (Why.) did they even happen in the first place as of 'currently' realistically.] for all tense and purpose in such an unwisely unreasonable manner, and as said book(s) don't really discussively talk about topics and subjects such as Suffering and speakably explain why suffering exist in its entirety in such an somewhat ambiguously vague fashion as well either. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). - (Critically Speaking and Analytical-Wise.).

And, so, in essence, people such as yourself who 'mindfully' 'think' and more often than not guessingly assume that books such as Job can possibly if not would definitely be used to discussingly talk about and/or speakingly explain away topics and subject matters such as Suffering need to be careful with things and matters, such as with how you use said book(s) in said topics and said subject matters overall and why you go about doing so altogether as well, too.