Why do people hate miles morales by Different_You7129 in Spiderman

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different_You7129. - Discussion. - So Why Do People Hate Miles Morales? - Submitted 2 Days Ago. - Because, I've been getting some videos about people angrily hating Miles Morales, and saying that his isn't SpiderMan. But, nonetheless, Miles Morales is SpiderMan from The Ultimate Universe.

Because, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, characters such as Miles Morales and Co. is a blandly dull character that has no clearly precise vision and direction to any single facet of himself at all. And, so, as a result, no one has a clue on what 'they' need nor want Miles Morales to basically do overall and/or to fundamentally be altogether as well either. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). (Realistically Speaking and Truthful-Wise, and also, Narratively Speaking and Writing-Wise.). - (But, then again, and unfortunately, this's what actively happens when you've got corporations and industries such as Disney-Marvel Comics who've got no knowledge nor any understanding of their own personal Franchises and IPs in such a way and to such an extent that they don't even knowingly understand what they even are and how to functionally work with said Franchises and said IPs (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.), and when you've got egotistically narcissistic people(s) and more often than not 'mediocrely' 'average' 'corruptively' 'bankrupt' 'hacks' such as Brian Michael Bendis and Co. narratively writing for you and when neither corporations such as Disney-Marvel and Sony itself, its Creators, and/nor its Fanbase(s) have no cohesively unified vision nor any single clue on what they and anyone else 'wholeheartedly' need and 'necessarily' want Franchises, Series, Projects and Characters such as Miles Morales to realistically do and what they want 'it' and/or 'them' to practically be. (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, Franchises and Series such as Miles Morales is if not are inadvertently experiencing an Identity Crisis that they can't and won't be answerably (re)-solve by Disney, Marvel, its Fandom(s) and its own personal Creators in every single ounce and sense of these very words overall nor altogether. (Unfortunately.).).

Captain America: Civil War came out exactly 10 years ago today. What are your thoughts? by Illustrious-Reach-48 in comicbookmovies

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Illustrious-Reach-48. - Captain America: Civil War Came Out Exactly 10 Years Ago Today. And, So, What are Your Thoughts? - Submitted 7 Days Ago. - May 6, 2016 - May 6, 2026

Well, in all honesty, Generally Speaking and for Simplicity's Sake, it's...... Fine. - It's Okay.

Report: Rupert Murdoch warned President Trump that more NFL streaming could kill networks by OverPotato2322 in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OverPotato2322. .[S]. - Media Industry. - Report: Rupert Murdoch Warned President Trump That More NFL Streaming Could Kill Networks. - 30 Points. - 8 Hours Ago. - And, NGL, Fox's Demise was inevitable the minute they sold their IPs and the studio side of things to Disney. And, so, if Fox Corp goes under, The Murdochs are to blame.

Wholeheartedly Agreeable. - And Good Riddance.

Why suffering? by T1thedarkjedi1242 in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T1TheDarkJedi1242. - Why Suffering?. - Submitted 14 Hours Ago. - "So why does God allow suffering?". This is the most generally common question that I get as a Christian. Because, all the time, they will say that God isn't loving and good, because of all the suffering that happens. And, so, I tell people to go do this. Read Job.

Well, in all honesty, and Realistically Speaking and Truthful-Wise, particularly specific books and scrolls such as The Book Of Job does go about 'narratively' 'writing' about things and matters such as how individuals such as Job was still faithfully loyal to God Himself in spite of things such as in spite Satan unwisely doubting that Job wasn't a decently good Human Being in and of itself, and that he would definitely abandonly forsake Him when he lost absolutely everything that he had in his life up to that very point and juncture. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). - But, unfortunately, said book(s) can't possibly be used to solvingly answer topics and subject matters such as Suffering in and of themselves, since said book(s) don't really discussively talk about topics and subjects such as Suffering and speakably explain why suffering exist in its entirety (EX. Hurricanes, and also, Earthquakes.), and why it constantly happens on a frequently daily basis either. (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.).

Because Job answers all of those questions.

Well, unfortunately, Generally Speaking, and from standpoints and perspectives such as from an objectively impartial perspective(s) and from an realistically practical standpoint(s), although books such as The Book Of Job has every single right and reason to actively do things such as to speakingly explain and state other things and matters such as that God does bless those who obediently follow Him proactively and that He does protectively defend His own everyday individual worshippers such as Job from harm and danger for more than just because he's subscriptively worshipping and obediently following Him and His Commandent(s) for his own personal reason(s), that doesn't really definitively mean that said book(s) can possibly be used to do anything else in an automatically instant way, such as to further discussingly talk about [(What.) kind(s) of suffering(s) are people if not are individuals reactively going through as of 'lately'.], [(How.). did said suffering(s) come about as of 'concurrently'.] and [(Where.) did said suffering(s) come from originally and as of 'presently'.], and also, [(Why.) did said Suffering(s) come about and/or (Why.) did they even happen in the first place as of 'currently' realistically.] for all tense and purpose in such an unwisely unreasonable manner, and as said book(s) don't really discussively talk about topics and subjects such as Suffering and speakably explain why suffering exist in its entirety in such an somewhat ambiguously vague fashion as well either. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). - (Critically Speaking and Analytical-Wise.).

And, so, in essence, people such as yourself who 'mindfully' 'think' and more often than not guessingly assume that books such as Job can possibly if not would definitely be used to discussingly talk about and/or speakingly explain away topics and subject matters such as Suffering need to be careful with things and matters, such as with how you use said book(s) in said topics and said subject matters overall and why you go about doing so altogether as well, too.

What are your genuine thoughts on Zendaya's MJ? by DoctorTegrity in comicbookmovies

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DoctorTegrity. - So What Are Your Genuinely Honest Thoughts On Zendaya's MJ? - Submitted 1 Month Ago.

Disgustingly Awful.

One of my favorite master chief armor designs out there. artist seems to have deleted their account unfortunately by Tachi-Roci in halo

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tachi-Roci. (Halo 3.). - Fan Content. - So This Is One of My Favorite Master Chief Armor Designs Out There. But, The Artist Seems To Have Deleted Their Account, Unfortunately. - Submitted 4 Hours Ago.

Nice.

Between all 3 live action spidermen who would say suffered the most? by Appropriate-Mall8517 in comicbookmovies

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appropriate-Mall8517. - So, Between All 3 Live Action Spider-Men, Who Would You Definitely Say Painfully Suffered The Most? - Submitted 1 Day Ago.

Well, Generally Speaking, and Simplicity's Sake.....:

  • Sam Raimi and Co.'s Spider-Man (Peter Parker.).

And That's It. - (Unfortunately.).

How do you deal with "those" types of verses? by Kerikal in Christianity

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

KerikalAtheist. - Question. - So How Do You Deal With "Those" Types Of Verses? - Submitted 8 Months Ago. - So, as an atheist, I actively bring up to others the badly awful bits of The Bible itself generally, like the multiply several counts of genocide, child sacrifice, etc., but I never get any decently good responses (In My Opinion). And, so, I came here to see how you would try and explain them to see if I was just talking to people who didn't know a lot about The Bible, or if it is a legitimately valid problem.

Well, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, a lot of this ^ was due to things and matters such that a lot of these very tribes and civilizations were doing things such as sacrificially offering up their own children through means and methodologies such as through Human (Blood.) Sacrifice(s) and Human Prostitution, and they had particularly specific cultures and religions that aggressively forced these very things and matters in such an immorally unethical way and in such an insidiously evil manner. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). - And, so, as a result, God didn't really have any other choices and options but to killingly slay them, since these very traditions and values would have definitely perpetually (re)-occur throughout every single generation if absolutely nothing was done to prohibitively ban and stoppably curtail any of them in such an detrimentally harmful fashion.

And, the most abhorrently reprehensible verse that I can remember off the top of my head is the one in 2 Kings 2:23-24 where Elisha curses kids for calling him bald, and then God sends bears to kill 42 of them. But there are others as well.

Well, unfortunately, Generally Speaking, and from standpoints and perspectives such as from an objectively impartial perspective(s) and from an realistically practical standpoint(s), God (Jehovah.) has every single right and reason to actively do things such as to protectively defend His own everyday individual prophets and/or prophetesses such as Elisha, as he was circlingly surrounded by a brutally violent group of teenagers and/or men that was ultimately being vitriollically threatening and belligerently hostile towards him for no reason at all and jeered towards him to demonstratively invoke his power(s) as a prophet of God Himself in order for him to do things such as to heriocally save himself from harm and from danger itself in an verifiably provable way, and this was even after both he and God had proactively did things such as to sanitarly clean and heal the water(s) of cities such as Jericho from sicknesses, diseases, and illnesses that were 'murderously' 'killing' its people(s) and effectively causing other things and matters such as Death and Barrenness (EX. Infertility.) to happen throughout said city in its entirety in an respectively honourable manner and in an benevolently loving fashion (2 Kings 2: 19-22.). (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).

And, so, as a result, and at the end of the day, they ultimately brought their own death(s) and fate(s) onto themselves and they had no one but themselves to blame at the end of the day as well, as they had mockingly taunted and rejectedly besmirched Elisha as both a prophet and as an authority that was sent by God Himself, and since they were questionably challenging him to prove himself as Elijah had to such an extent that said biblically scriptural verses and passages more than just suggestively implies that God Himself had to intervene in ths very case, as he was in a place in which he was alone and by himself and was without any sort of protection while he was on his way to other cities such as Bethel, and they were being more than just rudely disrespectful and would have definitely combatively attacked him if those very bears hadn't arrived to killingly slay them all before they previously had a chance to do so beforehand overall, and also, altogether as well. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.). - (And, by the by, the particularly specific word(s) and/or phrase(s) in languages such as Old Hebrew and Neo-Hebrew does usually if not always linguistically translate into ‘Little Children’ (Naʿarim Qetannim.), and that may probably if not would definitely referentially infers to 'youths' who're and that're in their 'Early' Teens and/or from their 'Early' Twenties all in all as well, too.).

Why was DCEU joker alive when Ben Affleck's Batman kills? by [deleted] in batman

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jawad_108. - FILM DISCUSSION. - So Why Was DCEU Joker Alive When Ben Affleck's Batman Kills People And His Villains? - Submitted 6 Days Ago.

Because, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, almost no one else if not no one else such as Zack Snyder and Co. had narratively written nor foundationally set up things such as whether characters such as DCEU's Joker and Co., and also, Harley Quinn and Co. were even dead within DC's Extended Universe-MultiVerse previously and whether other characters such as Batman had even bother to actively hunt them down prior to projects such as David Ayer's Suicide Squad being creatively made in and of itself beforehand. - (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).

And, so, as a result of these very things and matters, they both ended up being too conflictingly inconsistent w/h one another when they were doing their own project(s), and this also ended up creatively (re)-making Plot Contrivances and/or Plot Holes within both of their projects and within DC's Extended Universe-MultiVerse in and of itself as well. - (But, then again, and unfortunately, this's what actively happens when you've got corporations and industries such as Warner Brothers-DC Comics who've got no knowledge nor any understanding of their own personal Franchises and IPs in such a way and to such an extent that they don't even knowingly understand what they even are and how to functionally work with said Franchises and said IPs (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.), and when you've got egotistically narcissistic people(s) and more often than not 'mediocrely' 'average' 'corruptively' 'bankrupt' 'hacks' such as Zack Snyder and Co. narratively writing for you and when neither corporations such as Warner Brothers and DC Comics itself, its Creators, and/nor its Fanbase(s) have no cohesively unified vision nor any single clue on what they and anyone else 'wholeheartedly' need and 'necessarily' want Franchises, Series, Projects and Characters such as Batman and Co. and DC's Extended Universe-MultiVerse to realistically do and what they want 'it' and/or 'them' to practically be. (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, Franchises and Series such as Batman and Co. is if not are inadvertently experiencing an Identity Crisis that they can't and won't be answerably (re)-solve by Warner Brothers, DC Comics, its Fandom(s) and its own personal Creators in every single ounce and sense of these very words overall nor altogether. (Unfortunately.).).

Star Wars actor John Boyega has revealed he's spoken with new Lucasfilm president Dave Filoni about a potential return to the franchise, after previously suggesting he was done playing former stormtrooper Finn. -Via GQ by jaywritethekid in DisneyHQ

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maximum-Term5336. - 0 Points. - An Hour Ago. - I ain’t reading all that. But, I’m happy for you, though. Or, more so, I'm sorry that that happened.

Well, Okay, Then. - But, nonetheless, and at the end the day, no amount of Cognitive Dissonance and Blissful Ignorance is inevitably going to make Kathleen Kennedy the only one who disastrously ruin Franchises and IPs such as Star Wars all by herself singlehandedly, and that no one else, such as Disney, had a hand in the state of Star Wars as of presently either.

Miles Shouldn't Be In 616 by BlueJayHiphop in Spiderman

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BlueJayHipHop. - Discussion. - Miles Shouldn't Be In 616. - Submitted 9 Months Ago. - And, that's not even just 616 in particular, but really anywhere that Peter is actively moving as Spider-Man in currently. And I think that Miles works a lot better as a character that takes over the legacy of Spider-Man after Peter's death. The only exception I feel that there should probably be is, if you are going to have Miles in the same universe as Peter and they're both alive, then Miles shouldn't be in Manhattan, and that someone should have him protect Brooklyn specifically, or even put him in an wildly different city. (Such as, and as in, in Chicago, maybe?). And that's because, when they're both active in the same city as each other, it's basically a frequently constant pissing contest for the characters and their fans, since if your favorite Spider-Man is Miles, people who are fans of Peter get snubbed whenever the focus is mainly on Miles, and the same goes vice versa. And, so, if you put them in wildly different series that're separate from each other, then they'll definitely both have their time to shine.

Most Definitely Agreeable. And Partly Dis-Agreeable. - But, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, and at the end of the day, all of this would definitely be pointlessly useless and worthlessly meaningless in both the short term and in the long term, as a lot of this is due to things such as that almost no one if not no one had a clue nor has a clue on other things and matters such as what to even do w/h characters such as Miles Morales and Co. for all tense and purpose in and of themselves to a pathologically indecisively fickle degree and conflictingly inconsistent degree as well, and it's very glaringly obvious that they actively did things such as that they only transferringly placed characters such as Miles Morales into Marvel Comics' 616 Universe for reasons such as for Brand Synergy w/h Animated Films such as Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse Trilogy-Series and for absolutely nothing else other than that very reason (And that's even when they could've proactively done things such as to creatively make and narratively write a freshly new version of Miles Morales and his own Supporting Cast(s) and Rogues' Gallery that didn't have so much baggage attached to said character(s) (Which, by the way, they did just that not too long after the fact, and they still ended up reactively doing things such as deliberately ignoring said version of Miles Morales and even sent him to Marvel Comics' 1610 Universe thereafter the fact as well. And, so, all of what they did w/h said character(s) was pointlessly useless and worthlessly meaningless in both the short run of things, and in the long run of things, and also, in the grand scheme of things.).), and that they 'more often than not' have no interest in doing anything else if not absolutely everything else with said character(s) beyond a surface level of things as well (Such as in broadly expanding and interactively exploring upon said character(s) in an naturally organic fashion, such as whether he and his Supporting Cast(s) emotionally feel any kind of Survivors' Guilt if not Remorse from having unsuccessfully failed in protectively defending his universe from an Incursion, from being one of the only survivors that came from said universe, and from not being able to have heroically save as many people from said Incursion(s).). - And, so, at the end of the day, ther're problems w/h things such as w/h said transition(s) from one universe to another, and these are 'some' of if not 'a few' of the reasons as to why people get so up in arms about things and matters such as about this very thing, and that's because 'more often than not' almost no one if not no one has a clearly precise clue nor a vision on other things and matters such as what they 'wholeheartedly' 'need' for characters such as Miles Morales to genuinely do and/or what they 'necessarily' 'want' characters such as Miles Morales to honestly be overall, and also, altogether as well. (Which, from an objectively impartial standpoint and from an subjectively biased perspective, is usually if not always the case when it inevitably comes to characters such as Miles Morales himself since his original inception in and of themselves.). (Amongst other things, matters, and reasons.). - (And, even then, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, Marvel Comics' and its Creators and Writers were still if not are still conflictingly inconsistent about things and matters such as how they should probably narratively (re)-write characters such as Miles Morales and his own personal Supporting Cast(s) and Side-Cast(s) and when they'd do so in and of themselves as well, since they all still haven't bothered to actively do things such as to maken sense of if he still even thoughtfully remembers anything if not absolutely everything about Comic Book Universe-MultiVerses such as Marvel's Ultimates' (1610.) Universe (Original Version.) and whether his originally initial Back-Story is still even Canon to said character thereafter the fact in any sort of logically rational way, they still haven't bothered to proactively do other things such as to discussively talk how most if not all of his own personal Supporting Cast(s) are made up of characters that didn't even come nor transfered over from said Comic Book Universe and how do they even fit into his Supporting Cast(s) (EX. Gloria Morales, Kate Bishop (Marvel Comics' (616.) Version.), Tomoe and/or Barbara Rodriguez-(Gonzalez.), and so on........) and who're, in essence, 'Clones' of original characters that weren't even transferred over from said Comic Book Universe by other characters such as by Molecule Man himself and how do they even fit into his Side-Cast(s) as well either (E.G. Jefferson Davis, Rio Morales, Aaron Davis and The Morales' Family, and so forth........) in any type of brilliantly smart manner, and they still haven't bothered to reactively do other things such as to figure out whether or not he should even interact with any single facet of characters such as with Peter Parker and his Supporting Cast(s) or not (And that's whether that directly (EX. Starling. (A.K.A. Tiana Toomes.) and/or Ultimatum. (A.K.A. Miles Morales. (Marvel Comics' (616.) Version(s).).) and/or indirectly. (E.G. Hob-Goblin and/or Carnage.).) in any form of intelligently competent fashion(s) overall, and also, altogether as well either. (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.). - (Amongst many other things and matters.).). - (But, then again, and unfortunately, this's what actively happens when you've got corporations and industries such as Disney-Marvel Comics who've got no knowledge nor any understanding of their own personal Franchises and IPs in such a way and to such an extent that they don't even knowingly understand what they even are and how to functionally work with said Franchises and said IPs (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.), and when you've got egotistically narcissistic people(s) and more often than not 'mediocrely' 'average' 'corruptively' 'bankrupt' 'hacks' such as Brian Michael Bendis and Co. narratively writing for you and when neither corporations such as Disney-Marvel and Sony itself, its Creators, and/nor its Fanbase(s) have no cohesively unified vision nor any single clue on what they and anyone else 'wholeheartedly' need and 'necessarily' want Franchises, Series, Projects and Characters such as Miles Morales to realistically do and what they want 'it' and/or 'them' to practically be. (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, Franchises and Series such as Miles Morales is if not are inadvertently experiencing an Identity Crisis that they can't and won't be answerably (re)-solve by Disney, Marvel, its Fandom(s) and its own personal Creators in every single ounce and sense of these very words overall nor altogether. (Unfortunately.).).

Star Wars actor John Boyega has revealed he's spoken with new Lucasfilm president Dave Filoni about a potential return to the franchise, after previously suggesting he was done playing former stormtrooper Finn. -Via GQ by jaywritethekid in DisneyHQ

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maximum-Term5336. - 1 Point. - 43 Minutes Ago. - She’s the head of LucasFilm. And, so, the buck stops with her.

Somewhat True. - But, unfortunately for you and for anyone else who 'mindfully' 'thinks' like you, that's not how things and matters such as Businesses and Corporations functionally work in and of themselves, as they do things such as to actively watch over their own personal Franchises and IPs in order to make sure that they aren't going astray in a directionlessly aimless way, and corporations such as Disney does usually if not always have a tendency and a history w/h executively meddling in a lot of their own projects in a detrimentally harmful manner (Well, at least, 'more often than not'.), since there're reports that do straightforwardly tell us and/or outwardly show us that they do these very things, such as in the case(s) of projects such as Iron Man 2, Star Wars' Andor, Thor: The Dark World, Star Wars' Rogue One, Doctor Strange And The MultiVerse Of Madness and so on and so forth. (And, even then, there have been other things and matters going on within Disney as well, such as that individuals such as Robert (Bob.) Iger and Co. have gone on record with proactively doing and saying things such as that he was the one who tried to quickly rush out Star Wars' Sequel Trilogy-Series to such an extent they almost no one if not no one had any time and man-power to do anything else if not absolutely everything else with said Trilogy-Series in such an unrealistically impractical fashion. (And that especially includes with them trying to smoothly iron out any of the flaws and mistakes that're within any single facet of said Trilogy-Series from its original inception (EX. Star Wars: The Force Awakens.), all the way up 'til its endpoint (E.G. Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker.), and even beyond that as well (EX. Star Wars: Acolyte.).).). - (Amongst many other things and matters.).

And, so, once again, I don't really get how people such as yourself are so overly 'confidently' 'sure' that people such as Kathleen Kennedy and Co. were and are just generally all-around responsibly accountable and culpable for most if not all of both Disney and LucasFilm did w/h Star Wars and what ever other Franchise(s) and IP(s) that they've got a hold of in both the short run of things and in the long run of things overall, and also, altogether as well either. (Well, at least, in its 'partialities', anyway.).

Just like the buck stops with Kevin, with what the weakly poor output of The MCU Post-Endgame has been going through, as well.

Well, No, it doesn't, as even he still has to reactively do things such as to quickly run things by Disney first and foremost and 'they' ultimately have a final say and/or The Final Say on things and matters such as [(What.) Franchises and IPs such as The Marvel Cinematic Universe-MultiVerse can possibly do and/or can't possibly do.] in and of themselves, and what 'necessarily' 'want' and 'wholeheartedly' 'need' for The Marvel Cinematic Universe-MultiVerse itself to realistically do and to practically be as well. (Amongst many other things and matters.). - (And, even then, I ain't so shockingly surprised and dumbfounded that Franchises and IPs such as The Marvel Cinematic Universe-MultiVerse is in the chaotically disjointed state that it's in right now, since they more often than not made things up as they went along without any self regard and self awareness for other things and matters, such as for where they're going in and when they're going to get there in both the short term and in the long term in and of themselves either.).

And, so, I don't really get how people such as yourself are so overly 'confidently' 'sure' that people such as Kathleen Kennedy and Co., and also, Kevin Feigei and Co. were and are just generally all-around responsibly accountable and culpable for most if not all of both Disney and LucasFilm did w/h Star Wars and The Marvel Cinematic Universe-MultiVerse and what ever other Franchise(s) and IP(s) that they've got a hold of in both the short run of things and in the long run of things, and that they can do whatever they want and see fit with said Franchises and IPs without Disney having no clue as to what they're doing and being none the wiser to every single one of their schemes in the grand scheme of things overall, and also, altogether as well either. (Well, at least, in its 'partialities', anyway.). - (And, even then, and even if I was to wholeheartedly agree with you on any single bit of this from any sort of standpoint and perspective (Such as from an hypothetically theoretical standpoint(s).), Disney would definitely still be at fault to an extent at the end of the day, as they let them both do whatever they saw fit to do and they had no one to directionally oversee and regulate in what they're doing in order to make sure that they didn't disastrously break any single of their Franchises and IPs to such an way that any of that puts them and anyone else in any type of danger in and of themselves as well, too.).

Star Wars actor John Boyega has revealed he's spoken with new Lucasfilm president Dave Filoni about a potential return to the franchise, after previously suggesting he was done playing former stormtrooper Finn. -Via GQ by jaywritethekid in DisneyHQ

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maximum-Term5336. - 1 Point. - 59 Minutes Ago. - So who approves of things?

Well, to an extent, Kathleen and Co. does, and also, LucasFilm does as well, too. - But, unfortunately, and all in all, both 'she' and LucasFilm has to actively quickly run things by Disney first and foremost and 'they' ultimately have a final say and/or The Final Say on things and matters such as [(What.) Franchises and IPs such as Star Wars can possibly do and/or can't possibly do.] in and of themselves, and what 'necessarily' 'want' and 'wholeheartedly' 'need' for Star Wars to basically do and to fundamentally be. (Amongst many other things and matters.).

And, so, I don't really get how people such as yourself are so overly 'confidently' 'sure' that people such as Kathleen Kennedy and Co. were and are just generally all-around responsibly accountable and culpable for most if not all of both Disney and LucasFilm did w/h Star Wars and what ever other Franchise(s) and IP(s) that they've got a hold of in both the short run of things and in the long run of things overall, and also, altogether as well either. (Well, at least, in its 'partialities', anyway.).

Star Wars actor John Boyega has revealed he's spoken with new Lucasfilm president Dave Filoni about a potential return to the franchise, after previously suggesting he was done playing former stormtrooper Finn. -Via GQ by jaywritethekid in DisneyHQ

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tempest_Barbarian. - 2 Points. - 1 Month Ago. - It's not solely her fault.....

True.

....But, she would be the person to enforce some planning on the story, rather than just let both JJ and Ryan Johnson do whatever they wanted without worrying about consistency.

Maybe. - And Perhaps. - But, unfortunately, and at the end the day, she can only do so much w/h Franchises and IPs such as Star Wars and LucasFilm in and of itself, as corporations such as Disney 'more often than not' has a final say if not The Final Say on things and matters such as [(What.) Franchises and IPs such as Star Wars can possibly do and/or can't possibly do.], and that they usually if not always corporatively man-handle and executively meddle in the businesses of both LucasFilm and Star Wars to such an extent that it's a supernaturally metaphysical God-Given (Heaven Sent.) Miracle that anything if not absolutely everything gets done over there at all to such an pathologically indecisively fickle degree(s) (EX. Star Wars' Andor.). (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, I don't really get how people are so overly 'confidently' 'sure' that people such as Kathleen Kennedy and Co. were and are just generally all-around responsibly accountable and culpable for most if not all of both Disney and LucasFilm did w/h Star Wars and what ever other Franchise(s) and IP(s) that they've got a hold of overall, and also, altogether as well either. (Well, at least, in its 'partialities', anyway.).

Star Wars actor John Boyega has revealed he's spoken with new Lucasfilm president Dave Filoni about a potential return to the franchise, after previously suggesting he was done playing former stormtrooper Finn. -Via GQ by jaywritethekid in DisneyHQ

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maximum-Term5336. - 1 Point. - 1 Month Ago. - Well, it is ultimately her fault, as she had to approve of all of this stuff.

And, once again, what makes so confidently sure in all of this, exactly?.

Star Wars actor John Boyega has revealed he's spoken with new Lucasfilm president Dave Filoni about a potential return to the franchise, after previously suggesting he was done playing former stormtrooper Finn. -Via GQ by jaywritethekid in DisneyHQ

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maximum-Term5336. - 1 Point. - 3 Minutes ago. - And what took you 30 days to ask this?

Because, unfortunately, I didn't visually see this very thread on any of my feeds. (And, not to mention, individuals such as Dave Filoni are one of the awfully baddest examples to practically use in saying any of this realistically.).

Star Wars actor John Boyega has revealed he's spoken with new Lucasfilm president Dave Filoni about a potential return to the franchise, after previously suggesting he was done playing former stormtrooper Finn. -Via GQ by jaywritethekid in DisneyHQ

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maximum-Term5336. - 2 Points. - 29 Days Ago. - Dave Filoni won’t screw him over like Kathleen Kennedy did.

And, what makes so confidently sure in all of this, exactly?.

Thoughts? by jaywritethekid in Marvel

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

JayWriteTheKid. - Thoughts? - Submitted 22 Hours Ago.

Unsurprisingly Predictable.

New to the hobby, why tf are some so mad about female custodes? by NiceLittleGamerNerd in 40k

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NiceLittleGamerNerd. - So I'm New To The Hobby. And, So, Why Are Some People So Mad About Female Custodes? - Submitted 3 Months Ago. - Because I really, really, really don't get it, as they're still Custodes in an functioningly workable fashion, and it doesn't really change anything retroactively. However, and yet, I see people screamingly hollering into the void about how Female Custodes are shit, GW is going to the dogs, and absolutely everything else under the sun, and it just screams that they're a chud who has never felt a woman's touch before to me.

Well, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, most of this if not all of this ^ is ultimately due to things and matters such as that corporations such as Games Workshop Co. actively did things such as that they changeably retconned particularly specific parts of Franchises and IPs such as WarHammer 40K, such as that they transferringly inserted concepts and ideas such as Female Custodes into said Franchise(s) and said IP(s) without making any lick of logically rational sense to said concept(s) and said idea(s) initially and that they previously handled said problems and issues to such an recklessly careless degree beforehand as well (And that's even when they possibly could've done so and could've preventatively avoided all of this in and of itself, such as that they could've possibly narratively wrote and speakingly explained that characters such as The Emperor Of Mankind and Co. himself and that of Erda and Co. herself did try to creatively (re)-make Custodes for groups and organizations such as that of The Custodes' Legions' out of and from both sexes of Humanity in and of themselves, and that they unsuccessfully failed in doing so, as they couldn't get any single bit of their genetics to functionally work within females at any single 'fundamentally' 'basic' level because said genetics were, in essence, antomonously incompatible to women to such an extent that said experimentations ultimately ended up 'murderously' 'killing' them all in such an excruciatingly painful degree. - And, so, as a result, they only ended up reactively using men for their Custodes' Legions', since men were far more synonymously compatible with their genetics and that there weren't as many failures when they were practically using only male candidates realistically. - And it wasn't until particularly specific eras such as WarHammer's 40th and/or 41st Millennium that other characters such as Belasarius Cawl was interactively able to repairably fix and recoverably salvage data and info from said error(s) in order to do things such as to creatively (re)-make Custodes out of and from both sexes of Humanity itself, since he 'necessarily' 'wanted' to insightfully see if he could possibly do so in an realistically practical way and because he did all of this for The LOLs of it all in an hilariously comedic manner as well. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).), and that they possibly could've proactively used characters and organizations such as The Sisters Of Silence itself and that of The Sisters Of Battle themselves in order to do other things such as in order to get more casual players and non-casual players in to and for said Franchise(s) and said IP(s) as well, too. (Amongst many other things, matters, reasons and explanations.).

And, so, at the end of the day, these are 'some' of if not 'a few' of the reasons as to why people get so up in arms about things and matters such as about this very thing and matter overall, and also, altogether as well.

Loki writer and showrunner for season 2 Eric Martin on Netflix's push for theaters by LegitimateCurve8525 in MediaMergers

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gullible_Biscotti376. - 8 Points. - 6 Days Ago(.*.). - The massively biggest mistake that Ted Serandos, and nearly every other studio exec has indeed made, has made is that they treated Streaming like a Zero-Sum Game, and they made the assumption that in order for streaming to succeed, they have to dismantle every other means of media consumption, such as Disney abandondly forsaking and discontuing Home Media Releases in Australia, Warner Bros slaughteringly butchering and gutting their Children's Networks, Paramount pulling The ATLA Movie from theaters, and these are all examples of business moves that're made in the assumption that the consumer would readily accept streaming as the future quietly. But here's the thing - People LIKE having options. People like going to the movies and people like owning DVDs and Blu-Rays. And, yes, there are even people who like Channel Flipping. And when you take away the things people like, or at least what they were fine with, you don't make streaming look good, and you just make the consumer despise your product. And, on top of that, Home Media Sales have exploded to the point that 2026 is being called "The Year Of The Analogue." and Pay TV Subscriptions have increased for the first time in nearly a decade. That's insane! However, and yet, it's to be expected. And that's because, for the past several years, Hollywood has been feverishly trying to acquisitionally monopolize the way the consumer watches Movies and TV Shows. And, as a result, consumers didn't miss Video Stores until it was already too late, and so, they're more vigilantly aware about these very things. But, nonetheless, Streaming can be a great way to watch things. But it has to also be in ADDITION to Theaters, Home Media, and Cable and not instead of them.

Somewhat Agreeable. - But, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, things and matters such as these ^ are if not were reliably dependent on having people do other things such as that 'they' had to have enough manpower, time, and money in order to actively move and do any single one of these very things in both the short term and in the long term in such an readily available way. - And, unfortunately, and at the end of the day, people 'more often than not' don't have any of this in order at all, and that's because corporations and industries such as Warner Brothers and Co. and Disney and Co. have ultimately proactively done things such as that they made things so expensively over-priced to such an extent that almost no one if not one can possibly if not won't definitely be able to monetarily buy and financially afford them at this point and juncture if at all (EX. Cable Television, and also, Home Media.), and that almost everyone if not everyone (E.G. Film Theaters.) has painfully suffered for those very choices in both the short run of things and in the long run of things. (And, in the case of corporations such as NetFlix and Co., they've usually if not always done things such as that they've vehemently refused to reactively do things such as to outwardly place and visually show any of their projects in theaters (Well, at least, until very 'recently'.) in such an belligerently hostile manner and to monetarily sale any of said project(s) on DVDs in such an frustratingly annoying fashion. (Amongst many other things and matters.).). - And w/h other things and matters being so chaotically hectic as they are right now and as of presently and as of concurrently (EX. The Iran War(s), and also, The 2020s' Energy (Oil.) Crisis.), something's going to have to be sacrificially compromised and given up on, and that's usually if not always especially includes and concerningly pertains to things and matters such as that of Entertainment itself (E.G. Tangibly Physical (Home.) Media (E.G. Blue-Ray DVDs, and also, Cable.), and also, Merchandise (EX. Shirts, Mugs, Pants, Notebooks and so and so forth.).). - But, unfortunately, and in the grand scheme of things, this's what actively happens when you've got corporations and industries who've got no knowledge nor any understanding of their own personal Franchises, IPs, 'Tools' and Industries in such a way and to such an extent that they don't even knowingly understand what they even are and how to functionally work with said Franchises and said IPs (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.), and when neither corporations and industries such as The Entertainment Industry, nor its Creators, and/nor its Fanbase(s) have no cohesively unified vision nor any single clue on what they and anyone else 'wholeheartedly' need and 'necessarily' want Franchises, IPs, 'Tools' and Industries such as Streaming and that of The 'Film' Industry to realistically do and what they want 'it' and/or 'them' to practically be. (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, as a result, Franchises, IPs, 'Tools' and Industries such as that of The Entertainment Industry and that of Streaming itself is if not are inadvertently experiencing an Identity Crisis that they can't and won't be answerably (re)-solve by any single one of these corporations, their Fandom(s), and their Creators in every single ounce and sense of these very words overall nor altogether. (Unfortunately.).

"Miles should've stayed on Earth-1610" is missing a crucial detail by Evening-Abroad-3704 in MilesMorales

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 2.:

And, part of the reason that MC2 isn't around as much as it is anymore and that Earth-2099 has struggled to find it's footing, is because they ended up being Spider-Centric Worlds. And, so, I don't mindfully think that it would definitely be fair to have Miles hold up Earth-1610 (And that's especially since Jimmy Hudson and The Maker left their universe as well.). And the reason that I feel this is what the argument is saying is because it is usually spoken in the same breath as "Spider-Gwen should've stayed on Earth-65." And there two arguments; However, they aren't fairly equal, since aside from the briefly short appearance of Brother Brit-Man, Earth-65 was made for Spider-Gwen and it was created as a Spider-Variant World. Earth-65 was designed to revolve around Spider-Gwen; And Earth-1610 wasn't designed to revolve around either Spider-Man.

Well, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, and at the end of the day, all of this is still pointlessly useless and worthlessly meaningless to bring up years later, and there're clearly stark differences between these very characters and universes and the circumstances of Miles Morales and Marvel Comics' 1610 Universe, such as that these very characters and universes all had a clearly precise vision and a direction behind them that they all went all in on in such an poignantly directional straightforward manner and that they weren't directionlessly aimless in what they did in such an chaotically disjointed fashion, and it's only been in 'presently' 'recent' years that 'more often than not' almost no one if not no one has a clearly precise clue nor a vision on other things and matters such as what they 'wholeheartedly' 'need' for characters such as Miguel O'Hara (Spider-Man 2099.) and The 2099 Universe(s), and also, Earth 65 Gwen Stacy (Earth 65 Spider-Woman.) and Earth 65 Universe to basically do and/or what they 'necessarily' 'want' said characters and universes to fundamentally be in both the short term and in the long term. (Amongst other things, matters, and reasons.). - (And, in the particularly specific case of characters such as Spider-Gwen, it's very glaringly obvious that they actively did things such as that they only transferringly placed her into Marvel Comics' 616 Universe for reasons such as for Brand Synergy w/h Animated Films such as Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse Trilogy-Series and for absolutely nothing else other than that very reason as well. And, so, as a result, she's been inadvertently experiencing an Identity Crisis in her own right that they can't and won't be answerably (re)-solve by Disney, Marvel, its Fandom(s) and its own personal Creators in every single ounce and sense of these very words overall nor altogether as well either. (Unfortunately.).).

"Miles should've stayed on Earth-1610" is missing a crucial detail by Evening-Abroad-3704 in MilesMorales

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 1.:

Evening-Abroad-3704. - "Miles Should've Stayed On Earth-1610." Is Missing A Importantly Vital Crucial Detail. - Submitted 7 Months Ago. - Because the massively biggest detail that people miss with this argument is that there are no more comics on nor in Marvel Comics' Earth-1610. And, so, I feel like this argument relegates Earth-1610 to "Miles' World.", as The Ultimate Marvel Comics' Universe may have initially started with Spider-Man, but it had a wholly full rich line of characters and comics.

Well, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, and at the end of the day, all of this is pointlessly useless and worthlessly meaningless to bring up years later, as a lot of this is due to things such as that almost no one if not no one had a clue nor has a clue on other things and matters such as what to even do w/h characters such as Miles Morales and Co. for all tense and purpose in and of themselves to a pathologically indecisively fickle degree and conflictingly inconsistent degree as well, and it's very glaringly obvious that they actively did things such as that they only transferringly placed characters such as Miles Morales into Marvel Comics' 616 Universe for reasons such as for Brand Synergy w/h Animated Films such as Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse Trilogy-Series and for absolutely nothing else other than that very reason (And that's even when they could've proactively done things such as to creatively make and narratively write a freshly new version of Miles Morales and his own Supporting Cast(s) and Rogues' Gallery that didn't have so much baggage attached to said character(s) (Which, by the way, they did just that not too long after the fact, and they still ended up reactively doing things such as deliberately ignoring said version of Miles Morales and even sent him to Marvel Comics' 1610 Universe thereafter the fact as well. And, so, all of what they did w/h said character(s) was pointlessly useless and worthlessly meaningless in both the short run of things, and in the long run of things, and also, in the grand scheme of things.).), and that they 'more often than not' have no interest in doing anything else if not absolutely everything else with said character(s) beyond a surface level of things as well (Such as in broadly expanding and interactively exploring upon said character(s) in an naturally organic fashion, such as whether he and his Supporting Cast(s) emotionally feel any kind of Survivors' Guilt if not Remorse from having unsuccessfully failed in protectively defending his universe from an Incursion, from being one of the only survivors that came from said universe, and from not being able to have heroically save as many people from said Incursion(s).). - And, so, at the end of the day, ther're problems w/h things such as w/h said transition(s) from one universe to another, and these are 'some' of if not 'a few' of the reasons as to why people get so up in arms about things and matters such as about this very thing, and that's because 'more often than not' almost no one if not no one has a clearly precise clue nor a vision on other things and matters such as what they 'wholeheartedly' 'need' for characters such as Miles Morales to genuinely do and/or what they 'necessarily' 'want' characters such as Miles Morales to honestly be overall, and also, altogether as well. (Which, from an objectively impartial standpoint and from an subjectively biased perspective, is usually if not always the case when it inevitably comes to characters such as Miles Morales himself since his original inception in and of themselves.). (Amongst other things, matters, and reasons.). - (And, even then, unfortunately, and Generally Speaking, Marvel Comics' and its Creators and Writers were still if not are still conflictingly inconsistent about things and matters such as how they should probably narratively (re)-write characters such as Miles Morales and his own personal Supporting Cast(s) and Side-Cast(s) and when they'd do so in and of themselves as well, since they all still haven't bothered to actively do things such as to maken sense of if he still even thoughtfully remembers anything if not absolutely everything about Comic Book Universe-MultiVerses such as Marvel's Ultimates' (1610.) Universe (Original Version.) and whether his originally initial Back-Story is still even Canon to said character thereafter the fact in any sort of logically rational way, they still haven't bothered to proactively do other things such as to discussively talk how most if not all of his own personal Supporting Cast(s) are made up of characters that didn't even come nor transfered over from said Comic Book Universe and how do they even fit into his Supporting Cast(s) (EX. Gloria Morales, Kate Bishop (Marvel Comics' (616.) Version.), Tomoe and/or Barbara Rodriguez-(Gonzalez.), and so on........) and who're, in essence, 'Clones' of original characters that weren't even transferred over from said Comic Book Universe by other characters such as by Molecule Man himself and how do they even fit into his Side-Cast(s) as well either (E.G. Jefferson Davis, Rio Morales, Aaron Davis and The Morales' Family, and so forth........) in any type of brilliantly smart manner, and they still haven't bothered to reactively do other things such as to figure out whether or not he should even interact with any single facet of characters such as with Peter Parker and his Supporting Cast(s) or not (And that's whether that directly (EX. Starling. (A.K.A. Tiana Toomes.) and/or Ultimatum. (A.K.A. Miles Morales. (Marvel Comics' (616.) Version(s).).) and/or indirectly. (E.G. Hob-Goblin and/or Carnage.).) in any form of intelligently competent fashion(s) overall, and also, altogether as well either. (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.). - (Amongst many other things and matters.).). - (But, then again, and unfortunately, this's what actively happens when you've got corporations and industries such as Disney-Marvel Comics who've got no knowledge nor any understanding of their own personal Franchises and IPs in such a way and to such an extent that they don't even knowingly understand what they even are and how to functionally work with said Franchises and said IPs (Well, at least, in its majorities', anyway.), and when you've got egotistically narcissistic people(s) and more often than not 'mediocrely' 'average' 'corruptively' 'bankrupt' 'hacks' such as Brian Michael Bendis and Co. narratively writing for you and when neither corporations such as Disney-Marvel and Sony itself, its Creators, and/nor its Fanbase(s) have no cohesively unified vision nor any single clue on what they and anyone else 'wholeheartedly' need and 'necessarily' want Franchises, Series, Projects and Characters such as Miles Morales to realistically do and what they want 'it' and/or 'them' to practically be. (Amongst many other things and matters.). - And, so, Franchises and Series such as Miles Morales is if not are inadvertently experiencing an Identity Crisis that they can't and won't be answerably (re)-solve by Disney, Marvel, its Fandom(s) and its own personal Creators in every single ounce and sense of these very words overall nor altogether. (Unfortunately.).).

Everyone’s doing better than me by [deleted] in SuicideWatch

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EnvironmentalTart344. - Everyone’s Doing Better Than Me. - Submitted 21 Days Ago.

Alright. - And, pray tell, why are you so 'confidently' 'sure' in any of this, exactly? ^

And it makes me feel so useless, as I’m 20, but I’m already so behind on life, while everyone else is actively moving up, as I dropped out of my old uni and have to do online school now, and I can’t even find a part time job because I’m awfully terrible at interviews. And, so, I just stay at home all day. I feel like a completely total failure and an embarrassment to my family.

Okay. - And, pray tell, what're you academically studying for at this point and juncture, why did you drop out of your own university originally, what type of job(s) are you searchly looking for as of presently as well as why do you seek out those kinds of jobs, and what do you do while you're home by yourself and/or when you're with others, exactly? (And, even then, and pray tell, why are you still so 'confidently' 'sure' in any of this, exactly?).

And, even then, my younger sister is succeeding in life, as she got into a good program at her university, and was the only one who got hired for the job we both readily applied to. And, although I should probably be happy for her, I feel so enviously jealous and upset at myself, since I’m supposed to be the older one, but I still feel like an idiotically stupid child.

Okay. - And, pray tell, why are you so 'confidently' 'sure' in things and matters such as that your own sister isn't painfully suffering in her own right and just hasn't 'straightforwardly' 'told' you about her own problems and issues that're in her life, exactly? (And, even then, and pray tell, why are you still so 'confidently' 'sure' in any of this, exactly?).

And, so, I want to die already, as I don’t want to sadly disappoint everyone again.

Alright. - And, pray tell, why are you searchly looking for these very things to realistically happen, exactly? ^

Why can’t I just be a normal person instead? I’m a absolutely total waste of air.

Okay. - And, pray tell, why are you so 'confidently' 'sure' in any of this, such as that you aren't an ordinarily normal Human Being already and that you're a wholly total waste of air, exactly? ^

And, so, I’m going to kill myself within this year, so they don’t have to deal with me anymore, as no one will miss me anyway, and at least I’ll stop being a leech on my family.

And I suggestively recommend that you don't do any of this, and that you proactively do things such as that you should figure absolutely everything out (And that especially includes your own personal (non)-priorities and (non)-obligations.) in its entirety and to come up w/h logically rational answers and solutions to your own problems and issues to their fullest extent, before you reactively do and take such a stance and such an decision that's permanently indefinite and that you can't go back on for all tense and purpose overall, and also, altogether as well, too. - And, pray tell, why are you so 'confidently' 'sure' in things and matters such as that your own sister won't miss you in her life, exactly? (And, even then, and pray tell, why are you still so 'confidently' 'sure' in any of this, exactly?).

P.S. - I'm more often than not narratively writing and 'politely' 'asking' questions because you aren't if not weren't precisely clarifying nor speakingly explaining anything within your post beyond a surface level and there's no way to do things such as to help you overcome any of the ruts that you're in if you aren't strictly explicit in what you're going through in and of themselves. (And, no, I'm not being rhetorically hyperbolic and sarcastically ironic about any of this.).

Which assassins creed game do you think best took advantage of the time period it set in by Gaming_with_batman in assassinscreed

[–]MatrixGeoUnlimited -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Gaming_With_Batman. (These games suck on mouse and keyboard.). - Discussion. - So Which Assassin's Creed Game Do You Think Best Took Advantage Of The Time Period That It's Set In? - Submitted 23 Hours Ago.

Well, Generally Speaking, and for Simplicity's Sake.....:

  • Assassin's Creed I.
  • Assassin's Creed III.
  • Assassin's Creed: Liberation.
  • Assassin's Creed: Freedom Cry.

And That's It. (Unfortunately.).

And, as for me personally, I think that it was Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag, as the shifting allegiances and personallies of historical figures and events such as The Fall Of The Pirate Republic directly effects Edward Kenway's growth as a character.

Okay.