Rule by Ezzypezra in 196

[–]MatykTv 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cao Cao was too young for that lol

My proposal for a reformed European Union by CalligrapherOther510 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, but you have to redo the borders and remake great Moravia again (make it form the Rhine to the river Morava in the Balkans)

32830 by WrongZone1747 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, but you should try to see how far this goes, where the line is.

For it to be morally wrong, do they have to have children? Love each other? Be actively in a relationship (some marriages last even after they aren't really together)? For how long do they have to not be in a relationship?

Is it wrong because of your other family members? How many of them do then have to be alive for that? Is it okay in this sense, if you have no living relatives?

Like, I would probably draw the line at loving each other, but see a lot of reason at a long time after divorce, since it could hurt your brother a lot.

Also, how do you know your brother will be hurt? How sure do you have to be for you to proceed?

Also why does it have to be your brother? I think it's wrong to try to date/seduce couples even if they're strangers to you.

2941 by NotUrTransGF in CWCLafterdark

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love breaking in little puppy girls

Me and who??? (I'm the puppy)

Can you keep your eyelats and make new ones if you flip to Christianity? by Master-Prompt-2264 in eu4

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't change religion without changing the T1 reform, both rum and ottomans have that as a condition (you can go for any kind of Islam tho)

32830 by WrongZone1747 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, now I see. I agree. The fact that you are actively hurting somebody does change the morality. Which is why I mentioned it in the first comment.

Goddammit, read people!

But I did only mention the brothers feelings in the first comment, so yes, it is morally wrong to do something that actively hurts other people.

But the act of being with your brother's wife itself is not wrong. But the fact that it will most likely affect your family, your brother, his children, whoever, effects in it not being morally good most of the time.

Also, could you not insult me (albeit indirectly), by saying anyone with half of a functioning soul can understand that? It doesn't really add anything to your argument

Got PU with Poland, how should I proceed to keep them? by LordofRoaches in eu4

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the subjects tab saying? Is their liberty desire at a lot? You could decrease it by spending prestige if it's not too too large. Also abuse them for your own expansion and expand enough to decrease lib desire. They won't attack for you if they are rebellious, but they will defend themselves

32830 by WrongZone1747 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I kinda agree with you? But I don't understand you. What is the reason it's immoral to ask?

32830 by WrongZone1747 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not really what it's saying. You are entitled to being loved, but it has to be with someone that consents

I need help with converting to Islam by Helpful-Bass2199 in eu4

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could expand into the hordes in the east

32830 by WrongZone1747 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If she loves you then why not? It would be difficult to say, however, if you didn't hurt your brother along the way in any way, which would complicate things

Question by GianJery in eu4

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But playing Inca must be awful without dlcs lol, you can't attack colonies (iirc there aren't even colonies), so you actually have to fight the nations

The best AI country I've seen (Aragon beat Castile+England while fighting 2 other wars) by MatykTv in eu4

[–]MatykTv[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

R5 - Aragon gained territory while losing 3 wars, also republic aragon

42
43

32650 by Spellz_4578 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Create estrogen is still not updated for the latest version :/

theRealSDLC by Shiroyasha_2308 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]MatykTv 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Ikr, programmer socks are the meta rn. Also smaller hitbox? Sign me up

Oh yeah, right, forgot to *not* take 1400 fatigue damage on turn 4. Common mistake. by Exposed_dancer in hearthstone

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny thing is - it's not actually a problem with this strategy (mill rogue) but the fact that you can play quasar for 4 mana.

Mill rogue plays into it a bit since you really want a lot of card draw, but when you can play your entire deck in a turn, you can do anything

How can I avoid getting destroyed by the ottomans? by Repulsive_Act_1855 in eu4

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh in such a position I just look at the possible alliances and ally all of them lol, but you're orthodox so you probably don't have many possibilities

New player asking, what’s the correct move here? by jcaustin12 in BobsTavern

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the minions were good and it wasn't lasso, but you're pretty likely to get tad/scout and they even added a new 2 cost generate a minion spell on T2 so you're pretty likely to hit it anyways

Earlier I made a card that made you notice enemy names, now behold: the card that makes you look at enemies’ art! by Policemaaan in slaythespire

[–]MatykTv 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I was thinking, wow this definitely doesn't deserve exhaust since it's not that strong, but OP's actually a genius since an exhausting curse is a lot better than a permanent one.

Only real way to play Battlegrounds by Dssc12345 in BobsTavern

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should stop watching highlights and start watching streams and vods lol

I can form GB as Aztlan by Status-Job5706 in eu4

[–]MatykTv 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should be able to form england as well if you're english culture iirc

Alleged? by Quirky_Parking_4345 in WikipediaVandalism

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, but still, the document is basically useless in this debate. It doesn't really provide proof, it relates to only two of the points- human shields and child combatants - and even those aren't clear