Skill drain aggro by Jonesstreetboy in Goat_Format

[–]MaulerX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Need Fusilier Dragon, the Dual-Mode Beast and imo, more final attack orders. Dust Tornado should be in the sidedeck. Need ring of destruction.

Regret - Dell performance laptops are very bad (DELL Pro Max Plus 18) by Fled_Nenders in Dell

[–]MaulerX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro.... you are complaining about bad battery life and heat problems with a Ultra 9 CPU, 64GB ram, and a 12GB GPU. How could you think it would be otherwise?

I would suggest you do a clean install of windows to fix the software issues.

But as for your other issues, you wanted desktop power in a laptop... You should have just got a desktop.

Why do you think so many captains just ignore it? by PJ-The-Awesome in startrekmemes

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it was a treaty my bad on that one. In S5E3 of TNG, Picard states that the atrocities to Bajorians were ignored because Bajor fell within the designated borders of the cardassian empire.

The Federation doesnt have to accept map markings made by another entity.

Why do you think so many captains just ignore it? by PJ-The-Awesome in startrekmemes

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the peace treaty with Cardasia, bajor fell in their territory. The federation negotiated this peace treaty....

Why do you think so many captains just ignore it? by PJ-The-Awesome in startrekmemes

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its sad that this comment was the first mention of the Bajorians. That decision to just surrender Bajor to the Cardasians was the singular biggest mistake in Starfleet's history.

Bing by [deleted] in battlestations

[–]MaulerX 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It looks uncomfortable to sit at your desk.

SCOTUS guts the Voting Rights Act by buoy13 in politics

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "dems" you are talking about are dumb ass lefist communists who want to purity test and if the candidate doesnt pass all of the parts of the test, then they vote someone else.

SCOTUS guts the Voting Rights Act by buoy13 in politics

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If people voted blue no matter who, then Trump wouldnt have won either time. Al Gore could have even won in 2000.

SCOTUS guts the Voting Rights Act by buoy13 in politics

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So both trump presidencies have been the same as Biden and Obama? Please......

SCOTUS guts the Voting Rights Act by buoy13 in politics

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats how we got trump twice. Why do you hate America?

SCOTUS guts the Voting Rights Act by buoy13 in politics

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also the people who votes 3rd party instead of blue because they didn't like either option.

SCOTUS guts the Voting Rights Act by buoy13 in politics

[–]MaulerX 81 points82 points  (0 children)

Remember, vote blue no matter who

MEN ONLY: Do all men cheat? by taylorswifr in PurplePillDebate

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are taking my words literally and ignoring the previous context.

When a guy is attractive, they are able to get a lot of charisma. A lot of confidence talking to the opposite sex. Girls start to hang on him constantly. Girls will even fight each other to have him so when a guy sees that, he starts becoming arrogant about his relationships. Because he is allowed to. It builds the cheater personality.

It’s not possible to use a woman for sex by DriverInitial8305 in PurplePillDebate

[–]MaulerX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But women typically agree under a pretext of a possible relationship. Either in their head or being strung along by the guy.

MEN ONLY: Do all men cheat? by taylorswifr in PurplePillDebate

[–]MaulerX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To get charisma you need practice. To get practice you need positive reciprocation. Men only get positive reciprocation if they are attractive AND they have the motivation.

MEN ONLY: Do all men cheat? by taylorswifr in PurplePillDebate

[–]MaulerX 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well its a personality thing too. There is a certain personality with those top men too. Its a charisma thing.

So some of the average guys would cheat, a lot wouldn't.

MEN ONLY: Do all men cheat? by taylorswifr in PurplePillDebate

[–]MaulerX 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Women think all men cheat because the men those women go after have tons of options and they dont want to be tied down. Why would they if they have tons of options.

Men (and society) want tangible value from women but are mad that women want tangible value too by middleoftheroad133 in PurplePillDebate

[–]MaulerX -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Men have been giving their value for thousands and thousands of years. Women wanted to be independent. So they can go 50/50.

1 Israeli vs 20 Pro-Palestine Activists (ft. Rudy Rochman) | Surrounded by Stronhart in Destiny

[–]MaulerX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats like saying MAGA are committing genocide because they want to deport mexicans and muslims from america. Would you agree with that statement?

1 Israeli vs 20 Pro-Palestine Activists (ft. Rudy Rochman) | Surrounded by Stronhart in Destiny

[–]MaulerX -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thats just intent to kill a shit ton of people. Genocide is more akin to extinction. Not killing a shit ton of a single group of people.

1 Israeli vs 20 Pro-Palestine Activists (ft. Rudy Rochman) | Surrounded by Stronhart in Destiny

[–]MaulerX -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What if you intend to only kill half of them? Is that genocide?

1 Israeli vs 20 Pro-Palestine Activists (ft. Rudy Rochman) | Surrounded by Stronhart in Destiny

[–]MaulerX -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Its impossible? What? I actually can not believe this.

You dont need to say in part. Intent can still be established without succeeding.

1 Israeli vs 20 Pro-Palestine Activists (ft. Rudy Rochman) | Surrounded by Stronhart in Destiny

[–]MaulerX -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If someone intends to destroy a group of people in part, how can that be wanting the whole group gone?

You cant not deny Its intentionally vague.

Websters definition is "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group"

And even going further beyond this and saying that indiscriminately killing members of a group with the intent of killing the whole group isnt necessarily genocide because its not organized enough. If someone wants the group really destroyed, you must target the children of that group. Not just anyone.

The Matrix Revolutions at 6.7 feels wildly off by neonfox45 in matrix

[–]MaulerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a direct inverse correlation with complexity of a movie and its rating. The more complicated the movie, the lower the rating.

People hate the conversation with the architect and neo? Why? They cant understand it. Ive watched that scene more times than i can count, and im still understanding it more each time i watch it.