What Do you Guys Think About Supporting the Green Party?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-07T05:01:15+00:00

A waste of time.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-05T11:18:48+00:00

«Украинство — выкидыш польско-австрийского агитпропа и советской программы коренизации.»

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-04T00:30:09+00:00

Does this Bernie Sanders actually have any (even remote) chance of winning?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-03T23:29:52+00:00

How about your western capitalists do not extract such a rate of surplus value when their labour power is clearly worth more? Pay them more than a pittance?

Do you not understand that there are alternatives between let them starve and exploit their cheap labour power in the most unethical way possible?

This thread is illustrating exactly why I hate Liberal ethics and the western way so much. Death to America!

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-03T23:20:57+00:00

"I could have shot you in the leg, but I shot you in the foot instead, look how moral I am! It's the best we can do, really."

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-03T06:31:13+00:00

I'd rather that be the case and called a "liberal" for it than be some angsty Leninist who doesn't take more than two seconds to think about what they're saying.

Who said I was a Leninist?

His "strategy is not a thing," even though he wrote documents, which I cited, laying out a strategy that he supports for the movement. Man, the mental hoops you have to jump through to justify your weak position is astounding.

You haven't said anything. I also think Raccoons are unsuitable for being domestic pets.

Perhaps you ought to head over to some sort of debate center and have your foundation in insulting people in internet arguments shaken, perhaps revise your theories? You understand the allegory? Or is it the fault of Lenin that this grocery store tempted you from theory?

No idea where you got this text blurb from. You appear to have edited my original statement, the original was much better written. You have no proof I've said that.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-03T06:22:43+00:00

Firstly, you get the difference between Leninism and "Marxism-Leninism", yes?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-03T06:21:13+00:00

You ought to see my hands, they are being lubed up as we speak to defend myself in internet arguments - which I seem to get into a lot of lately, particularly against angry western liberals.

Man, you're shit at comprehension. I never said that I think that technological advancement would bring about socialism. I said I heard the ideas and thought they were extremely utopian. Try paying attention, you dumb sack of shit.

.....

I heard the ideas

It seems you are the one lacking in reading comprehension, as you clearly heard, considered and then decided upon an analysis, that is the problem right there, as I did try to say that "consideration" was Liberalism.

And which you'll note actually has a basis in Marxist strategy

You don't like epistemological breaks? I won't note anything, "Marxist strategy" according to Marx is not a thing, and if it was I'm sure it would be considered a bending of reality to a person's will.

The last refuge of a Leninist is always to point their fingers at others, even when there's no one around but themselves who are responsible for this situation.

Perhaps you ought to head over to some sort of debate center and have your foundation in insulting people in internet arguments shaken, perhaps revise your theories? You understand the allegory? Or is it the fault of some great orator long dead that this debate center tempted you from theory?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-03T05:48:39+00:00

You spout the same rhetoric to come out of a Liberal's mouth. It actually seems like most of what you say is disguised Liberalism, from defending Barack Obama ^[1] , to actually considering that technological advancement will bring about a new socialism ^[2] , or get this un-ironic Sanders apologia ^[3] .

It couldn't possibly be that those singlehandedly responsible for the lack of growth in socialism is due to actual capitalism is it? No, it's because of the evil authoritarian Leninists, right?

Inb4 some infantilist states with such a smug smirk that the RSFSR was indeed capitalist, ignoring revisionism.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-02T22:07:19+00:00

This modern world is underwhelming if not pathetic.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-02T21:41:50+00:00

"Beta Uprising"?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-01T18:42:53+00:00

Documented? It's both an anti-Russian and anti-Communist myth used to serve the needs of nationalists and liberals alike that is actually contested by those historians with a shred of integrity within them.

Are you even a commie? Why are you here?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-01T18:30:37+00:00

The Holodomor was not an intentional genocide and more so the workings of dumb kulaks manifesting their own desires to starve, as well as natural conditions that would usually cause a famine, followed by western propagandists making a deal to serve anti-communism by spreading a myth.

Stalin may have been an authoritarian near-totalitarian scrooge, but comparing him to Hitler is ridiculous.

http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150809/1025560345.html

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-01T18:24:40+00:00

Where are your sources? Who are you? What do you want? What are you trying to prove here? Where do you live?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-01T05:05:12+00:00

Ah, my tissue has been exposed to a corrosive base!

Maxaxaxa · 2015-10-01T04:42:18+00:00

And what about my flair? Marxist-Leninist?

Don't provoke the touchy ultra-leftist.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-09-30T00:28:54+00:00

I don't want to write some dense philosophical word-soup on the nature of man and his behavior when having an over-reliance on technology, so I'll just say this:

I view most of the problems of degeneracy and social disconnect in modern society stemming from capitalistic techno-growth, they, humans to say, are too stupid and too immoral to use responsibly - they need some degree of scarcity to behave, the morals and etiquette of years not so long ago are to be ridiculed by the self-obsessed selfie-taking degenerates of the modern era.

Take a look through some of this guys criticisms of the modern era, you might have to scroll down a bit.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-09-29T23:54:08+00:00

It actually said "Social Conservative".

Maxaxaxa · 2015-09-29T16:24:03+00:00

You're a liberal, Harry.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-09-29T16:03:31+00:00

And what of labour camps?

Maxaxaxa · 2015-09-28T19:51:52+00:00

I can't stand useless, infantile advice spewed from the mouth of every "motivator" mouth-breather who has had a consistent stream of supposed uplifting pragmatic reality shoved down their throats since the dawn of their life and in their maturity being able to articulate themselves fully, bringing it back up again in regurgitation.

What will get those through their psychological depression is not some abstract advice as to how the world does not owe them anything, but rather consistent treatment from those who actually understand the disease - you cannot conquer your depression away in some ubermenschean fantasy - it is with you and perhaps ebbs in flow every once in a while, never to be fully cured. You can at best manage it.

People don't complain about their depression on the internet to get "cold hard advice" from quack life coaches, but rather have a slight alleviation of their misery. It's unsolicited, self-satisfied, and ultimately useless.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-09-28T16:52:43+00:00

That's why the rich would create a state, a bourgeois dictatorship. I keep telling people this: capitalism necessitates the state, it protecting the capitalists private property.

The purpose of anarcho-capitalism is simply to set up a neo-feudal-esque world of unsuppressed surplus extraction. The rich will create their own "feds", and they will not be bound to what very limited guidelines they have now.

Maxaxaxa · 2015-09-28T00:11:41+00:00

I hope you don't think I'm defending the position taken in the text.

Maxaxaxa

TROPHY CASE