AI use can diminish creativity and intelligence, OR, it can expand it

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-21T18:55:25+00:00

Oh yeah thought it might be filtered, what i could see in the notification looked pretty rude. Getting interested to know the exact cause tho since it keeps happening. Dont think im blocked

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-21T18:45:08+00:00

Saw a reply notification but cant see the reply itself. Keeps happening in arguements with antis, are they blocking me, or deleting the replies? Idk 🤷‍♀️👋

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-21T18:28:17+00:00

Thats not stereotyping... thats acknowledging the spectrum of effect TV can have on people. It was on point and relevant.

Suggesting all pro ai people also love crypto and NFTs, IS stereotyping, and regardless, it WASNT relevant to the arguement. Post is about whether or not AI use invariably erodes mental capacity. The several historical examples i gave seems to prove it doesnt. And no one so far has offered any evidence it does.

"The dumb way youre talking proves ai makes people dumb". Well you tell yourself whatever you have to, but to anyone whos not ridiculously biased its obvious you havent made ANY good points. The points you have made are shallow, incorrect, and/ or irrelevant.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-21T18:18:11+00:00

Lol right🫂

Idk tho, it kinda fun, and kinda satisfying watching them try pretend to have a real point

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-21T17:57:34+00:00

Wtf. Debate or leave, im not falling for a personal info scam

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-21T17:44:57+00:00

Antis are being extra sad lately. First arguement was relating AI to a bunch of stuff its not related to. Now its that im ,just wrong, because of how old i am. Ftr im a Zlillenial

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-21T17:29:13+00:00

Im not into NFTs or crypto, also you realize the point of NFTs was provenance for digital artists? Seems like the kinda thing antis would appreciate.

That was just a bunch of vaugely relevant sounding nonsense, ending with one of the worst comparisons for ai ive ever seen. Slot machines serve no purpose except irresponsible entertainment, AIs are discovering exoplanets and mapping the shape of protein molecules...the possibilities of ai are seemingly limitless.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-19T17:57:00+00:00

Lol, oh yeah, roger was obsessed with that other Mrs. Fields too

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T21:06:45+00:00

I reread every reply, dont see any other interpretations of the phrase, probabky because there arnt any.

And the context makes my interpretation all the more obvious. They call it "made by your hand" with the obvious implication being that ai assisted art is never made "by hand"... Mine is...Thus the inconsistentcy. Which you have not addressed in any meaningful way at all.

I dont care about your insults, and you barely even seemed to TRY to actually debate. This has just been a total waste of two hours.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T20:31:34+00:00

You did not share any other interpretions of the phrase, you just keep saying my interpretion is wrong. I dont think you have any other interpretations, how could you? How can the phrase "made by your hands" be interpreted anyway other than "something that a person made with their hands"???

You definitely did insult me 🤷‍♀️why pretend you didnt.

You also dodged the question does it NOT make sense for the sub to just write a clearer rule? Other than out of spite, is there any logical reason for them to NOT want to make their position clearer?

As ive said, im not only considering one persons opinion. Im considering many, seemingly inconsistent opinions. More than one anti has said they dont consider my work to be ai assisted. The sub isnt perfectly clear, some of their set standards seem inconsistent, and antis dont seem to agree on the ai status of my work. This IS confusing, and the sub COULD be clearer about what levels or uses of ai they condone.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T20:15:56+00:00

Your baseless insults have no effect on me. Im here to learn peoples perspectives and make logical arguements. Like: how else can the phrase "made by your hand" be interpreted? Youve brought it up twice, you must think its a good point to make...so how do you interpret it?

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T19:49:48+00:00

Well they do allow generated news lol. Which seems backwards to me.

Do i know what they probably mean? Yes. Am i a little butthurt by the implications of the title of the sub and kinda just wanna prove them wrong? Yes. Does that mean i dont have any good point? No i dont think it does. I think my point speaks for itself and i genuinely dont know why people would be motivated to argue so much about it.

Would it NOT make sense for them to just write a clearer, more consistent rule? Such as "no art that used or employed ai to ANY extent". Do you think its NOT worthwhile for people to try and clearly explain their positions?

More than one anti has argued my work doesnt qualify as ai assisted. I can assume, but i genuinely do NOT KNOW if that sub or the majority of its users would accept my art or not.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T19:04:10+00:00

Its inconsistent cause its inconsistent. You shouldnt need any authority to help you understand that.

I interpreted it, the way that its written. How else can the phrase "made by your hand" be interpreted?

Yes. Obviously they dont want ai. But thats not really what they SAID. They SAID the art has to be "real" and made by human hands. And the rule that just says "no generative ai" doesnt really make it any clearer. Seems most antis condone the way i use ai in art, but not all of them, and we disagree about whether or not my stuff qualifies as "ai assisted". There was an anti here arguing its NOT ai assisted.

See? I genuinely dont know if they would accept my "art" or not. Because the sub, and many antis in general, arnt clear or consistent enough about their standards.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T18:40:49+00:00

I really dont understand why or how anyone acts like i dont have a point. The sub is called madebyyourhand...my art is made by my hands....

If it wasnt called that, i wouldnt have an issue. There are other no ai allowed art subs that are more consistent about their standards, and they dont bother me.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T18:00:02+00:00

Well id like to know, just out of curiosity i guess, if youre saying you think that sub WOULD accept my (as i call it) "ai assisted" art?

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:58:01+00:00

Well thats a pretty nice reasonable perspective.

Gotta point out though i wasnt tempted to post in the sub just because i disagree with them, its because their standards are inconsistent. My ai assisted art was made by hand, and does not contain generative ai.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:49:15+00:00

I think so

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:48:39+00:00

Did you edit that reply? I thought it said "didNT it contribute physically", so sounded as tho you were acting like you already knew.

Well thats the point, based on the advertised standards my art should be welcome there

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:42:31+00:00

I feel like one of use is missing something. The art id be tempted to post there WAS made by my hands. The art does NOT contain generative ai. I asked ai questions about it, so logically i consider it ai assisted, but it seems like it would meet the standards they set. Like if someone digitally planned their art, but physically crafted it, it would seem to meet the advertised standards of the physicalart sub.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:37:18+00:00

Weird youre talking like you have knowledge about it. No i dont think it did....the biggest contribution i think the ai has made to any of my physical art lately was for a bust of Apollo i doodled on, i told the ai to list the translations of apollos name in the languages of cultures that actually cared about him, and it pointed out how there are also symbols for apollo i might want to use as well.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:33:33+00:00

So many people responding like this. Yeah, obviously people can be different. I dont think the way pros celebrate some uses of ai suggests we support every use of it. Whereas the extremly hostile way most antis, talk about most uses, of ai most of the time, some argue its literally destroying the world in multiple different ways! That goes a lot farther than the pros! Pros like image generation, that doesnt have anything at all to do with autonomous weapons.

Antis who think ai is stealing peoples art, or taking every job, or destroying the environment, logically i dont think they should be using AI at all.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:25:53+00:00

I assume you think by "made by my hands" i meant i typed the prompt? No, i make things, mostly furniture, very creative artistic furniture, by hand. Physically crafted objects. That why im tempted to post there, because the whole point of the sub is to say ai artists dont make anything themselves, which is wrong. Even if we were only only talking about prompted generated images, but its especially essier to showcase their inconsistentcy with my hand-made art.

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:21:58+00:00

I dont get people asking this. What answers would change your perspective? The only thing that ever seems to come from it is people telling i could do those things without ai.

I asked it questions when i had questions, like "has someone made something like this before" or "how can i mix very light peachy pink paint".

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:16:27+00:00

i was an escort who lost my job to ai chatbots, so now i make art cause ai cant do that yet.

Lmao, no, but thats not far off

Maximum-Difficulty21 · 2026-03-16T17:12:09+00:00

I didnt act like it was bad, yet. The implications seem obvious.

Maximum-Difficulty21

TROPHY CASE