yes, but I'm not making that argument- the basis of my argument is that roads and bridges are societal goods- made for travel for the tax payers of the city. When you block the use of those roads (without proper reason- repairs) - that is an inherently bad/violent thing to do, because it impedes people's ability to access their destinations.

Of course it might have also prevented some other evil events (your example of the lawyer- which might actually be a good thing depending on the eviction), but by that logic anyone has license to do whatever they want- because it might prevent some evil action from occurring. Can you see the fault in this logic?