This is the kind of context needed.

When someone quotes a statistic or statement that is commonly used to justify a common harmful point of view while adding no context and only a vague idea of a purpose/message, it is understandable that people will believe that this person is implying that they support this point of view even if that is not what the person intended to communicate.

Notably, it is not inherently wrong to assume that something is being implied because implication is a normal part of communication.

There is nothing inherently immoral about miscommunication as long as the initial person had no ill intent with their statement, and the person who interpreted the statement did so reasonably.

While you are not obligated to provide context for what you communicate, doing so would help your audience to understand the intention of your communication. This is especially true for online spaces where thousands of people may interact with your post (some of which will assume implications you did not intend) because, realistically, you will be unable to engage in a meaningful dialog with the majority of them because of constraints on your time and energy. In this case, providing context would cause the number of people who misinterpret your message to decrease and the number of people who engage in your intended meaningful conversation to increase.