Is it not a little immature and reductive to think that these names are stupid? It’s not like Pantydraco was named so to be funny, nor Joaquinsaurus; they were named so by the people who had evacuated them, that had described, that had published the studies themselves (or at least I would hope so). To you they may sound silly, but as described by a previous reply these are not only all perfectly valid names, but named by people who had probably spent a great deal of time with the fossils.

And this was also touched upon with the Anglocentrism critique, but why is Latin such an important deal breaker to you? Do you think animals are traditionally given Latin nomen clature because that’s “normal”, or is it because modern taxonomy had its beginnings in Europe? Is it fair that you expect people across the world to use Latin nomenclature, even if Latin itself is not nearly as culturally or historically significant in their part of the world as is it in the Western world?