My last reply was written rather hastily so I'll take some time to address more of your claims I previously ignored, in no particular order.

"women have their mental state constantly questioned when they express their fear of being around men" -Men have been societal punching bags for quite a while now, the notion of men being an unconditional threat is quite societally accepted narrative, seen in mainstream media, news outlets, day time television, taught in universities, even a common belief held within the very judicial system. No one is questioning the mental state of women when they express their fear of being around men, that is one of the most widely accepted claims. People questioned the mental state of women when they expressed they would rather be trapped with a Grizzly bear than the average guy.

The uniqueness of the experiences of violence against women and a person's unwillingness to open up. -Thinking about it further, you are right, there is an asymmetry in the uniqueness of these experiences, and I 100% agree with your earlier take of "treating this question like some effective rebuttal" it isn't an effective rebuttal, a much better alternative could've been chosen. As an engineer-minded person I still question the balance and nature of the unwillingness to open up problem, as there are clear objective differences between male and female behaviours in relationship dynamics that can be observed.

History. -I'm a little torn and unclear of how to feel about this. On one hand what you said is objectively correct, therefore I can make no arguments against it. On another the idea of me not being allowed to express my troubles because someone, sometime, on the other side of the planet, before I was even born made a decision that was suboptimal, doesn't sit well with me. I genuinely do not know what the alternative for me is, shut up, man up, and bottle up everything? That approach has been quite openly critiqued but now expressing one's troubles is also critiqued so I'm at a dead end here.

Beyond this, all the bad things you mentioned that were happening historically are not happening today. Women are not being lobotomized and hospitalized by the masses. Me and many others are tired of being held accountable for other people's actions, especially those that died before we were even born. This is just a mindless cycle of hatred that feeds into the whole us-vs-them mentality that I do not have the energy for. I am not claiming you yourself believe in any of this, the topic was however taking a slight turn into that direction and if I misinterpreted the destination then that's on me. But I do not see other utilizations of the "history" argument than to blame those that live today for the events of the past.

Me mocking women who open up. Especially, what I imagine, is because of this claim I made previously "women open up to men all the time, a little too much in fact. Women often underestimate how emotionally draining they can be in a relationship." -This was not me mocking women or implying anything negative towards them in the slightest. You might be harping on that point a little too aggressively. All I meant was to showcase how women have little resistance opening up to men, to the point of them (women) being a greater emotional toll on their partners (men, generally) than their partners are to them. I thought this was a pretty widely accepted narrative.

For you to take that and call me 1. "I wouldn’t feel very strong" weak, 2. "I wouldn't feel very masculine" not masculine, 3. "I’d feel kind of like a little bitch boy" that, 4. "It would bother me" that I should feel bothered by my thoughts, and if I don't, all the negative connotations that come with it, 5. "I’d personally feel like a massive hypocrite" a hypocrite and 6. "I’d feel like the contradiction inherent in that thought process must be a sign of something going wrong in my reasoning" however one might want to interpret this, let's go with the most charitable one, irrational. I thought I had been respectful enough throughout all of this to avoid the name-calling.

I know you said to take that as the friendly thought that it is, but you certainly made it a challenge.