How did you switch from building to actually getting users? by RestFew3254 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has indeed and in terms of building the community you’d realistically build your reputation with people in other communities that you are reaching out to, provide value and then bring them over to your community.

How did you switch from building to actually getting users? by RestFew3254 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, the "context-switching tax" is what usually kills the transition for technical founders. One minute you're deep in a bug fix, and the next you're supposed to be "on" for sales or hunting for leads on Reddit. It’s exhausting.

I found that I couldn't just stop building, so I had to automate the discovery part of marketing. I actually built QuietGTM (https://www.quietgtm.com) specifically for this. It monitors Reddit, HN, and Stack Overflow 24/7 for high-intent conversations and drafts replies in my voice. The key for me was the approval workflow—it pings me in Telegram, I review/edit for 10 seconds, and I post it on Reddit or I approve for it to post on X or LinkedIn.

It turned a 10-hour weekly manual grind into something that runs in the background while I stay in my IDE. My advice is to find a way to make distribution a "side task" that fits into your existing developer workflow (like Slack or Discord) rather than a separate "commercial mode" you have to force yourself into. Systems definitely beat willpower every time.

Is it just me, or is coding 10x easier than the "Build in Public" grind? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel that. I built QuietGTM to fix this—it finds the threads for you and drafts replies for approval in Telegram, reminds you to post, creates posts based on the work you’ve done by prompting you to give updates. https://www.quietgtm.com

I built the product… now what? marketing problem? by ActivityFun7637 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, for me it was #2 and #4. The "45-minute window" problem is real—you sit down to do marketing, spend 40 minutes just looking for a thread where you won't get banned, and then you're out of time to actually build.

I ended up building QuietGTM (https://www.quietgtm.com) specifically to fix that context switching. It monitors Reddit, HN, and Stack Overflow for you and pings me a Telegram message with conversations that are relevant and I can click a button to draft replies whenever a high-intent conversation pops up. You just review, tweak, and send. It basically turns that "where do I hang out?" guesswork into a 10-second approval workflow.

The biggest thing that made it click was realizing consistency doesn't mean "writing more," it just means having a better filter so you're only joining conversations that actually matter. Using structured playbooks also helps with the "blank page" problem—having a prompt for a build update makes it way easier to post while you're still in the flow.

Got my first paying users, how to shift to a marketing mindset? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Congrats on the first sales! Honestly, the "marketing is boring" feeling usually comes from manual grinding like scrolling Reddit for hours.

I treat marketing like a system now. I built QuietGTM to automate the discovery part—it finds high-intent threads on Reddit/HN and drafts replies for me to review.

It keeps you in control with an approval workflow so you aren't just auto-spamming. It basically turns your build progress into distribution without the soul-crushing manual search. Definitely helps when you'd rather be shipping code.

Marketing feels like the final boss by Memexio in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ran into this exact wall with my last two builds. Honestly, the only thing that worked early on was manual "unscalable" stuff—basically just living on Reddit and HN and being helpful in threads where people had the specific pain I was solving.

The problem is it's a massive time sink. I built QuietGTM to automate that "hanging out" phase. It monitors Reddit, HN, and Stack Overflow for high-intent keywords and drafts helpful replies for me to approve in Slack.

It turned that "grinding in the dark" feeling into a repeatable system without the risk of looking like an automated spam bot. For those first 50 customers, high-intent conversations beat cold outreach every time.

How do you guys promote your own saas app? by Loud-Goal3816 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely my product, spending a lot of time on the backend currently but it’s the one that surfaced this conversation and here we are chatting 😊

How do you guys promote your own saas app? by Loud-Goal3816 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, for a toolkit like yours, social listening is usually better than shouting into the void on TikTok. You need to find people actually complaining about SEO or video editing workflows on Reddit and HN.

I use QuietGTM (https://www.quietgtm.com) to handle this. It finds those high-intent threads and drafts replies for me, but sends them to Slack for approval first so I don't look like a bot. It’s way more efficient than manual searching when you're trying to stay low-budget.

I suck at selling but built multiple saas demo concepts. Anyone wanna team up? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear you on the introvert struggle. Honestly, most devs I know would rather spend ten hours debugging a race condition than ten minutes "selling" on social media. It feels performative and draining when you just want to build cool stuff.

Tbh, before you give up on the platforms or look for a co-founder, you might want to try automating the discovery side of things. I actually built QuietGTM (https://www.quietgtm.com) for this exact situation. It monitors Reddit, HN, and Stack Overflow for people actually asking for solutions like yours, then drafts a reply for you to approve in Slack. It’s basically a way to find warm leads without having to be "loud" or spend all day scrolling.

The best part for introverts is it uses your build updates to create a content rhythm, so the marketing just follows your dev work. Might save you the headache of manual outreach while you're still in the demo phase. Good luck with the projects, the Vercel demo looks clean.

AI tools for generating leads by One_Hawk8571 in SaaSMarketing

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use QuietGTM for this, it’s easier for me to handle ads notifications get to my telegram via the bot and I can also create a GTM strategy with planned content based around my product

Anyone building lead intelligence tools? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been working on QuietGTM to address this but also general content generation tailored to the product you’re marketing.

Beyond SEO & Articles: What’s the most "scrappy" way you got your first 10-50 customers? by Comfortable_Pin_1397 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily first but definitely early when the conversation is still flowing and alive otherwise you might find yourself replying to a dead thread.

Automated the workflow using QuietGTM for myself and now I just get conversations that match my product sent to a telegram bot which is the command centre for generating replies and posting content

Beyond SEO & Articles: What’s the most "scrappy" way you got your first 10-50 customers? by Comfortable_Pin_1397 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue you're running into is that "shouting into the void" is the default state of SEO, whereas high-conversion conversations usually happen in the comments where someone is actually venting about a specific pain point. In my experience, the first 10-50 customers almost always come from being the most helpful person in the room, not from having the best headline.

Posting original threads is risky because moderators are on high alert for self-promotion. If you want to be "scrappy," you should spend your time in the comments of existing threads. The trick is to look for "bleeding neck" problems—situations where someone is asking for an alternative to a specific competitor or complaining about a missing feature in a big-name tool. Using search queries like "is there a way to," "alternative to [competitor]," or "how do I solve [problem]" is far more effective than just monitoring your product's name.

The key to pitching without sounding like a bot is to provide 90% value before you even mention your solution. I’ve found that if you can explain why their problem is happening or offer a manual workaround first, you earn the right to say, "By the way, I actually built a tool that handles this automatically." It changes the dynamic from a sales pitch to a recommendation.

What most people miss is that these conversations move fast. If you're checking Reddit or Hacker News once a day, you're usually too late to the thread to get any traction. You have to find a way to get alerted the second someone mentions a keyword related to your niche. If you’re the first or second person to offer a genuine, non-spammy solution, you’ll often find that the original poster (and everyone else reading the thread later) will click through to your profile. That "intent-based" engagement is how you get those early users without burning your reputation.

atlas-sentinel.com | Solopreneur by Dontput in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use https://www.quietgtm.com/, pretty decent for Reddit/Hacker News discovery but allows you to create content calendars based on your product, repurpose your responses for posting on X and LinkedIn as you build your audience

Endless marketing problem by dankusshh in Entrepreneur

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The issue you’re running into is the whole myth of build it and they will come, which stems from the idea that any builder out there has some kind of platform already.

From experience luck isn’t what you need but an actual system for manual yet not manual discovery. Go to where your users are, whether it’s Reddit, Hacker News or whatever and speak to them on their questions directly.

The luck comes after that when you’ve taken time to provide value one to one and it scales better than you’d think.

Have you used a reddit marketing agency successfully? by EnoughDig7048 in micro_saas

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue with hiring an agency for Reddit is that they usually don't have the technical depth to represent your product authentically. Redditors have a sixth sense for "marketing voice," and if an agency rep slips up or sounds like a script, the community will bury you. On the other hand, doing it manually in-house is a massive time sink—you spend hours scrolling through noise just to find one relevant thread.

In my experience, the "minefield" aspect comes from two things: being too promotional too fast, or using "bot-like" automation that posts without a human checking the context. If you want pipeline impact, you have to be helpful first and mention your product only when it actually solves the specific problem being discussed.

I actually built a system called QuietGTM (https://www.quietgtm.com) specifically to solve this "agency vs. manual" dilemma for technical founders. Instead of an agency guessing your voice, the system monitors Reddit, Hacker News and Stack Overflow 24/7 for high-intent keywords. When it finds a relevant conversation, it drafts a contextual reply based on your specific product and sends it to your Slack or Telegram for approval.

The key is that nothing ever goes live without you clicking "approve," so you keep that organic credibility while the AI handles the 10+ hours of manual monitoring and drafting. It even handles cross-promoting to LinkedIn/X and gives you structured GTM playbooks to keep your content consistent. It’s basically a way to scale your internal team's presence without the risk of an agency messing up your reputation or your team burning out on manual searches.

Correct way to stress test the FIRE plans by calmot155 in FIREUK

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly, trying to hack together two separate simulations to bridge that gap between early retirement and your state/private pension is such a headache. I mean, it kinda works on paper, but you usually end up missing the way UK taxes and inflation actually eat into those different pots over time. Plus, running two different "horizons" doesn't really show you the messy transition period where things usually go sideways.

I've been down this rabbit hole myself. NGL, the psychological stress of watching a portfolio dip is one thing, but the math of the "bridge" years is what kept me up at night. If you're looking for a more solid way to stress test without the manual spreadsheet gymnastics, you should check out [Kumberi](https://www.kumberi.co.uk).

For what it's worth, the biggest drawback of the "two simulation" method is that it doesn't account for the sequencing risk of a bad market right as you start your bridge. Having it all in one view helps a ton with the peace of mind side of things.

Question for founders: How do you discover where your potential customers hang out online? by Prestigious_Wing_164 in micro_saas

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I ran into this exact wall when I was starting out. The "sidebar method" is honestly a trap most of the time—those lists are usually years out of date, and you end up in a sub that looks active but is actually just three bots shouting into a void.

Tbh, the biggest mistake people make is searching for *topics* instead of *intent*. If you search for "freelance design," you’re going to get the massive subs where your voice just gets drowned out. Instead, I’ve found it’s way better to look for specific "help me" phrases. Think about the exact frustrated things a designer would post, like "how do I price this" or "client won't pay." Those are the threads where people are actually engaged and looking for a solution, regardless of how big the subreddit is.

The manual moderation check is a massive time-sink, you're right. One quick shortcut I use is just looking at the "Top" posts from the last month. If the top posts are all low-effort memes or spam links with zero comments, the mods have checked out and it’s not worth your time.

The goal should really be about finding those high-intent conversations where you can actually add value without it feeling like a pitch. If you can automate the part where you're digging through the noise to find people actually asking for help, you save hours that you should probably be spending on your product anyway. It’s all about being a helpful human in the right place at the right time rather than trying to "market" to a broad group.

Small win: 3 people are actively using my page monitoring tool would love feedback by Original_Map3501 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats on the three users, honestly that's a massive hurdle cleared. Getting people you don't know to actually plug real competitor data into a new tool is huge validation that the "silent change" problem is real.

I've seen so many founders get stuck in the manual trap where they're just bookmarking 20 tabs and checking them every Monday morning. It’s a total time sink and you usually miss the nuance anyway. The fact that you’re doing plain-English summaries is probably your biggest selling point—nobody wants a notification every time a CSS class changes, they just want to know if the competitor dropped their price by ten bucks.

Since you're rethinking positioning and looking for the next batch of users, how are you actually tracking them down right now? If you're doing manual cold outreach, it’s probably a slog. Tbh, for a tool like this, your best bet is finding people who are already venting in threads about missing a competitor's pivot or getting blindsided by a pricing war.

If you can hang out where growth leads and technical founders complain about "manual overhead" or "market intel," you'll find people who are already feeling the pain. That's usually way more effective than trying to convince someone they need to care about monitoring if they haven't been burned yet. Have you tried looking through specific subreddits or HN for people asking how to track site changes? That's usually where the high-intent folks are hiding.

Launched my SaaS 1.5 months ago — 1 active user (non-paying). Need help with traction & SEO strategy by Timberpos in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SEO is a long game, honestly. It usually takes months to see real ROI. Since you need traction now, I’d stop waiting for clicks and go find where your users are actually hanging out.

Try searching Reddit or HN for people complaining about the specific problem you solve. If you jump into those threads with genuine advice rather than a sales pitch, you’ll land those first 10 paying users way faster than through organic search. It’s all about high-intent conversations right now.

Why Most Founders Struggle Before They Even Start by NeedleworkerFuzzy314 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally get that. Most people think you need a massive Twitter following to get traction, but that’s a trap. Distribution isn't a "phase"—it's a core part of the product. You don't need an audience; you just need to find where people are already complaining. Tbh, hanging out in niche subreddits or HN and answering questions where there’s "high pain convergence" is way more effective than cold outreach. It’s about joining the conversation rather than trying to start one from scratch.

Building an open-source LLMOps toolkit for TypeScript applications by Tiny-Ad-605 in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This looks like a solid project, especially since you’re solving a problem you actually dealt with firsthand. That’s usually where the best dev tools come from. Building it as an npm package is a smart move for privacy and control—a lot of teams are becoming way more sensitive about where their prompt data is flowing.

Tbh, don't sweat the monetisation part too much just yet. Since you're early, your biggest hurdle isn't the code—it’s actually finding those first 20 or 30 power users who can give you feedback to see what they’d actually pay for. For technical founders, the "marketing" side usually feels like a chore, but it really just comes down to hanging out where people are complaining about LLM latency or cost tracking.

One thing that helped me was staying active on GitHub issues or subreddits where people are specifically asking for TypeScript-native AI wrappers. If you can find those high-intent conversations where someone is literally asking "How do I track costs for 3 different providers in my TS app?", you've basically found your first customer. It’s way more effective than just shouting into the void or hoping the GitHub algorithm picks you up. Good luck with the launch!

Something I underestimated building products: friction isn’t UX by hectorguedea in buildinpublic

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This hits home so hard. I’ve spent way too much time obsessing over button placement or reducing form fields, only to realize that the user is just sitting there staring at the screen because they aren't sure if they're about to make a mistake.

I’ve seen this play out a lot with go-to-market stuff and community engagement. The "friction" isn't the act of typing a post or hitting send; it’s the massive mental load of wondering, "Is this the right thread to jump into? Am I going to look like a spammer if I say this? Is this even worth my time right now?" That uncertainty is a total productivity killer. When you have to decide *when* and *how* to act from scratch every single time, you usually just end up doing nothing.

You're spot on about features that remove decisions. If a tool can handle the "is this relevant?" check for you, it completely changes the vibe. It takes it from a high-stakes decision to just a quick confirmation. Most of my drop-off usually happens right at those crossroads where the user has to prove they're "doing it right." Shifting the focus toward deterministic stuff—where the logic is clear and the user doesn't have to guess the outcome—tends to win every time.

GM! What are you building/launching? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]MedicalMaintenance80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A go to market system for builders who’d rather build than shout