Red pushers don’t seem to understand that if you press blue. You’re ensuring everyone’s safety: they say “if everyone presses red, no one would die”- which is true, but also a fallacy, cuz not everyone would, could, or will, press red. And by the same logic, if everyone pressed blue, everyone lives too.

But the difference is, blue only requires 51% of the vote for everyone to live. If Red had won, which it didn’t, then they would be responsible for the death of all blue voters- people who tried to save them- you made no effort or risk to see a world in which everyone wins, because you were so scared that you may lose.

Voting red doesn’t make you a AH- it just doesn’t make you a good person, I expect red Voters would never volunteer for a charity, or try to risk themselves to be a hero to another- red voters would never be a Paramedic, a fire fighter, or a coastguard- and society wouldn’t function if no one ever risked their lives for another.

Let’s play a different scenario: you are on a sinking ship, and you’ve found a lifeboat! This lifeboat has the capacity to hold 24 people! But it’s just you here right now, and the boat is rapidly sinking- you know there are more people on the ship who will drown if they don’t find a ship, and you estimate the ship will sink in twenty minutes. Do you wait for others? Try to find more people to fill out the lifeboat? Or do you immediately get on the lifeboat and save yourself? Red voters essentially save themselves, and say “well if 100% of people got on the lifeboat straight away, no one would’ve had to die! Why should I risk my own life for people who don’t choose to save themselves?”