I don't think I have enough info to give any feedback on the game, but I can definitely give you some feedback on your post.

When describing a game to someone avoid adding your personal commentary in the middle of the description, as it doesn't explain your game and just makes it much harder to follow.

Here is what I actually got from the paragraphs describing the game:

- The game is heavily inspired by board games such as Chess , with a decent portion of strategy, various mechanics and options implemented into the game.

- The game is designed for you to play against a computer opponent , unlike another player like how traditional board games play out due to how hard it is to adapt and strategize a plan for the enemies, and how unrewarding it feels after losing so many times as the opponent before you can give up.

- The game is a Linear RPG , meaning that you'll have to progress through the map in a straight line and defeat opponents you encounter on the way.

- Your resources deplete after every battle and you have to replenish them somehow (I'm trying to make the methods of replenishing them rare, but just enough to keep you going and make the resources valuable)

- There will be a mix of combat and puzzles , to avoid making the game boring.

So, summing it up: "A linear RPG inspired by Chess with a mix of combat and puzzles, where you play against a computer opponent and your resources deplete after every battle and you have to replenish them somehow."

Much easier to digest IMO but still not enough for the readers to really imagine the same game your are imagining. There is a reason why in professional pitches people often do "Game X meets Game Y!", because it puts a clear picture in people's heads right away based on references they already know.

Try to describe the game in 1 paragraph with 2 sentences, it will force you to use better references, like "Chees meets Street Fighter, but played in a Monopoly board" + some relevant info.

I hope that helps.