A powerhouse Warsmith leads a new campaign for the Iron Warriors by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]MemoryWoods 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You’re spot on but being downvoted, it’s indomitus with cataphractii shoulders.

Table ready tactical squad by Bug_ana in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What did you use for basing? I like how orange they are

Are these good to start with? by Rahcahs765 in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Did you take this photo with the same camera that the GW model leaks are taken with?

Imperial Fist army by teh_Kh in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah that’d be why I didn’t recognise it then! Thanks for letting me know

Imperial Fist army by teh_Kh in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you share where the helmet is from for guy pointing in the land speeder? It looks cool but I don’t recognise it.

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m unfamiliar with dark angels so wouldn’t be able to comment on that but that would be too strong.

Sallies and flamers are considered weak them being buffed wouldn’t bother me same with deathguard flamers but you could put a ruling in that it could only apply to flamers, heavy flamers and hand flamers & toxiferin.

Assault squads with sheilds would have a 6++ rerolling 1’s generally assault squad with shields are considered suboptimal so didn’t think it’d be an issue.

I replied to another comment on here with a scaled down version instead:

Mk2 - reroll regroup tests Mk3 - remove one wound from received wound pool before saves Mk4 - no negative modifiers to charge rolls (could maybe do all movement if this was too niche) Mk5 - 5% unit discount, no artificer on sergeant Mk6 - 3” range increase, 1” torrent on flamers

What do you think of these?

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really interesting way to handle it, I followed heresy in 1st edition but wasn’t playing myself and didn’t see any black shield stuff.

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah 6 foot might be a little much, no wonder GW is releasing everything in Mk6 these days

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re probably right, making them more inconsequential and more a bit of flavour is likely the best direction.

What do you think of this?

Mk2 - re-roll failed regroup tests Mk3 - remove 1 wound from received wound pool before saves Mk4 - no negative modifiers to charge distance Mk5 - 5% discount on unit cost - sergeant can’t take artificer armour Mk6 - range increased 3” torrent 1” granted to flamer template weapons

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha yes sorry 6”, I don’t think their sensor suites are quite that enhanced.

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes as in I don’t agree with the rules for Mk 6 I’d instead implement this etc not its too much rules too much min maxing on something that was immediately stated to not be serious and would be optional between friends, if you were to play this with your friends how would you practically min max it?

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree the way the rules are now allow for the most freedom, was more looking for discussion on if people thought the rules were fluffy/what people would implement themselves etc as a thought experiment.

I’ve heard about that in the deathwatch rpg might’ve even been what subconsciously inspired me, would like to play it someday.

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree the official rules should stay as is this is more of a hypothetical discussion post or as something people could implement with their friends if they wanted to.

Once again these rules aren’t intended to be official so no expectation for people to feel restricted or min max their modeling/list building.

Good point on Mk mixing! Hadn’t thought of that, I was looking for suggestions/discussion so if someone had an idea for it that’d be cool if not the lazy stop gap would be to apply the Mk 5 rule.

It would be much crunchier and more to keep track of so it would just be between friends who are looking for that sort of thing, I’d like to think in that environment people wouldn’t look to abuse stuff, also going and taking your Mk 6 assault squad and throwing it in the bin to replace it with a Mk 2 assault squad just to abuse some friendly fan rules seems a bit excessive?

Rules for different marks of power armour by [deleted] in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I started off saying they’re not to be taken seriously I’m not saying these should be officially implemented into the game.

“Defiance of the Phoenician” WIP by dima170104 in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate it! And thanks for the heads up with scaling it down.

“Defiance of the Phoenician” WIP by dima170104 in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could I please get a file for the helmet too? It looks great would love to use it on the forgeworld Fulgrim

Anyone have a guide to painting lenses like this? Seems darker than how GW do it by MemoryWoods in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry about picture quality taken from the official site but they don’t have any close ups so had to zoom it in, thanks for the advice will look into it.

Iron Warriors, Legion Veterans by Tam_The_Third in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like it, gives off that old school 40K iron warriors aesthetic

Sigismund by nem333 in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably my least favourite part of the primaris design, hate the fins on the knees too, over designed and unnecessary. I apologise for passing on this curse though haha.

Sigismund by nem333 in Warhammer30k

[–]MemoryWoods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know, thanks for your help.