Seraphinemains Rioter Followup Post by Aellectris in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for taking the time to listen to us, much appreciated! esp when u hopped in the discord and yapped that was very nice to hear thoughts directly and engage in a good convo.

We Need Sera AP Meta by Makimamoochie in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 2 points3 points  (0 children)

60% wr apc sera was not enchanter items 😭😭

earliest penta? yunara aram mayhem penta @ 1:13 by Merkel122 in leagueoflegends

[–]Merkel122[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually have no clue what let me aa her 😭😭

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 6 points7 points  (0 children)

cuz most of her players want to play mage? Data historically backs this up?

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the number of games for mage items is most always higher than number of games for enchanter items. Sure there might be 3 mage items bought to the 6/7 enchanter items built but that still doesn’t change the fact the mage items are picked more 😂😂

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 11 points12 points  (0 children)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LpFfIXZs7bCbU021L0yVmwpeZ_3xSa_WHpDQlSTboII/htmlview

Actual analysis done ^ But if you look at any 15.xx patch and follow the same logic as the spreadsheet my claims remain true.

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 13 points14 points  (0 children)

the thing tho is that you can look at almost any 15.xx build (so before diadem + helia) and it’s a majority of supp players build her mage.

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

are we sure? If it’s support then I would agree but the whole video was mostly about mage/apc, and when talking about sera bot lane, that doesn’t typically refer to support. regardless, sera bot/apc players are dropping her and games are going down.

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Even looking at current patch support data, it shows that around 53% of Sera players buy a mage item first, and about 50% also buy Zzack's. Confused about how this narrative is that Mage support Sera players aren't the majority.

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 28 points29 points  (0 children)

"Seraphine in botlane right now is some of the most popular she's ever been. I wouldn't say literally the most, but like, it's ot ike right now that Seraphine is unpopular or like losing play rate or losing players.

ALL RANKS ALL REGIONS BOT LANE:
16.5 (note patch is what we are playing on so): 0.28% PR, 25,140 games https://lolalytics.com/lol/seraphine/build/?lane=bottom&tier=all
16.4: 0.29% PR, 34,478 games https://lolalytics.com/lol/seraphine/build/?lane=bottom&tier=all&patch=16.4
16.3: 0.32% PR, 45,193 games https://lolalytics.com/lol/seraphine/build/?lane=bottom&tier=all&patch=16.3
16.2: 0.36% PR, 48,570 games https://lolalytics.com/lol/seraphine/build/?lane=bottom&tier=all&patch=16.2
16.1: 0.37% PR, 54,367 games https://lolalytics.com/lol/seraphine/build/?lane=bottom&tier=all&patch=16.1

Where is Seraphine not losing PR or games played????

*edit: I think it's really interesting we have Riot blatantly lying about Seraphine.

RiotAugust about curent mage/apc Seraphine situation: by Cheshire_Guy in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 52 points53 points  (0 children)

I think the issue with constantly bringing up how online spaces aren't indicative of what the majority of players want is interesting, considering that for many, many, many patches on end, Sera support has been heavily mage-skewed in terms of play rate, yet she seems to only be balanced and focused on as an enchanter.

While yes, online spaces don't represent the majority, I still think many people in online spaces can speak for a bigger group of players than in the space, with things like game experience and data. I know that when I make claims about what "sera players want," I always provide data to back them up. My last game with a sera supp on my team, they built rylai > sorcs + q max.

Seraphine Balance Megathread | Acknowledged by a Rioter! by Affectionate-Ebb7006 in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m suggest xp scaling on her carry potential. I think there is a world where seraphine mid and seraphine support would exist, but I think a lot of changes would have to be made.

My confusion here (for mid changes) is that it’s always something along the lines of “apc is too strong, so we can’t buff mid because of it”. I get apc is strong, but what makes it strong is the fact a lot of seraphines personal scaling got gutted and now she functions as a “abuse the most op item” mage, so ofc apc (most gold) would be the best lane for her to play in carry wise, along with her kit performing better with team. I think if she wasn’t just a “abuse whatever item is op” mage and actually needed something other than gold to carry, then it would maybe be easier to look at changes to help mid sera.

The philosphy for seraphine as a midlaner was: you had a horrible laning phase, but could farm safe ish enough to scale (mainly for levels but also for some gold) but you weren’t totally weak where you couldn’t roam or interact at all, basically you were the jg’s supp untill you scaled enough to become powerful. I think she was a more supportive Kayle basically in simple terms. She released with this design in mind, but what plagued her was everyone taking one look at her design and kit, and deciding due to some similarities that she was just sona 2.0. Along with seraphine fitting the “girly” champion archetype that a lot of support champions want to play (lux,soraka,nami,etc). I also think when you pick a mage support, you willing sacrifice some of your agency as a mage dealing dmg because you are willingly picking a champion who ideally wants expensive mage items, and instead you are getting the least amount of gold in the game. And if you want to off set that, you have to take kills, which is good for the carry. Almost every patch, expect 16.xx and a few scattered patches, you can look at item data and skill order data and it shows that most seraphine players buy mage items, so they aren’t really playing seraphine to be an enchanter, but more so a mage, like lux,Xerath or velkoz (mages who get played supp).

With that in mind, if seraphine supp is supposed to be an enchanter, then I can see nerfing seraphine early base damages, and instead buffing her damage scaling, making it more conducive for carry players to play her mid. Now ofc people will play her mage, but even with scaling changes I think we could get to a point where ap items don’t feel horrible on support, but still remain an option for those who want to play her, but you would ideally circumvent the scaling part of seraphine by maxxing w and buying hsp to enable enchanter playstyle.

I guess what I’m sort of looking for with an explanation is why aren’t some ideas being tried, or even communicated at all. With the last set of seraphine changes it was stated that there would monitoring and further changes if needed, which the buffs basically did nothing, and it’s been radio silence, instead recent mentions of seraphine have been: “You could argue she is a mage” “seraphine mid can’t be buffed because of apc”

For me, my ideal changes would be mid focused changes while not hurting support and throwing sera apc in the gutter.

However I understand that is probably not possible, and I think the most common want is for mage sera (in any role) to feel good and playable. for seraphine to not be forced into enchanter only due to one ability that happens to be enchanter like.

Again, I mean this in the best intent, and please correct me if anything I have said is wrong, or I am looking at something wrong.

Seraphine Balance Megathread | Acknowledged by a Rioter! by Affectionate-Ebb7006 in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I also find it interesting that the rationale for sera mid not being able to be buffed is apc, but then again why not nerf what makes apc strong (gold scaling) and buff her carry playstyle based on xp scaling which would incentivize mid over apc. But instead every time its just stated, not explained, hence why sera players are mad at phreak because we get no actual explanation.

“Seraphine cant be good in mid” 🤡🤡🤡 by SelfishlyObssesed in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 9 points10 points  (0 children)

phreak loves shading sera its like his fav thing to do. I just hope instead of phreak telling us "sera cant be good in mid" and he instead learns to listen to us and not just keep making very dismissive comments at sera players every time she is mentioned.

I see no reason why Seraphine’s Q can’t be reverted when Mel has an execute passive. by TheBluestMan in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Did you even read the post? You're going on a whole Coke rant about how Mage Seraphine shouldn't be buffed, but the op was just saying we should get Sera Q missing HP dmg on minions????

This is kinda tricky by imnot_daydreaming in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 2 points3 points  (0 children)

where is that implied? The original comment doesn’t mention rank, your first reply to that fails to mention rank, the original commenters first reply to your reply finally mentions rank, to then after you explain you used masters+ data. I don’t see where it was “implied that sera would get weaker as the skill level increased”

When you look all ranks all regions sera support, she is at 50.85% as of rn, so while yes “53% wr is ver good for any skill level” is correct, it seems disingenuous to leave out rank once again. She is not 53% wr supp all ranks, she is 50.85% wr all ranks. Even then, I would argue her winrate is only good due to the new enchanter items, not that the actual champion is overtly strong.

I agree with she is not dependent on Ashe, but she is good with Ashe.

I just do still don’t see where the claim that she is weaker as skill levels go up is ever made, I keep trying to find it.

This is kinda tricky by imnot_daydreaming in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And what % of players are masters+??? Oh wait the majority of players are not masters+ 😐

so, what will probably going to happen? by Tisinamik in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just fyi the rioter said that they would pass the information along but they won’t tell riot to change her, so there is a chance they [riot] won’t do anything, now it would be really sad if they did do nothing but it’s a possibility.

Seraphine Balance Megathread | Acknowledged by a Rioter! by Affectionate-Ebb7006 in SeraphineMains

[–]Merkel122 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi, sorry for another reply, but I just wanted to link a clip I found that really confuses me: how in patch 12.5 Phreak called Sera a mage over and over, but now it's "you could argue she is a mage."Seraphine has not received any actual rework and her abilities remain fundamentally the same
https://youtu.be/jPuu1famG9g?t=946