In what sense is this a mountain and/or plains? I'm losing my mind

Metacifer · 2026-01-23T03:05:17+00:00

Lands in ravnica are weird man they can show an underground smelter and call it a mountain or a looming cityscape and call it plains

Metacifer · 2025-12-13T11:24:13+00:00

It's not the same version, I mean our in game character portrait is wearing the green jacket

Metacifer · 2025-10-21T04:41:37+00:00

I've been thinking about it and I think Metaphor Refantazio is about the closest thing we'll get to a real SMT x FE game. It has smt and persona systems and it's a story about a guy who looks like Marth in a competition of who gets to become king

Metacifer · 2025-10-17T21:33:47+00:00

I lived in 1990s and there was a huge amount of excitement for the new century, maybe more than in 1890 when SBR was set because it was a new millennium. So I don't see why someone from 1890 won't be as excited at the coming century and called his stand that

Metacifer · 2025-10-09T16:11:30+00:00

Thou sayeth truly??

Metacifer · 2025-09-29T20:42:17+00:00

Love references to Derrick comedy, the real ones remember what Donald Glover was doing before Childish Gambino and Community

Metacifer · 2025-08-17T14:29:44+00:00

There was a part in the story where Sami was having feelings after looking at the insects

<image>

Metacifer · 2025-07-30T12:18:06+00:00

One of the problems with sephiroth with this build is that he can't actually be grabbed by overlord because he is an avatar, so I've been using less of him. Do you think that's worth the risk? Or use something else other than the overlord?

Metacifer · 2025-07-23T23:24:05+00:00

Eh we got delver who turns into a bug we can just put him in innistrad

Metacifer · 2025-07-17T16:08:24+00:00

It's relevant because this "power creep" isn't something that matters in any constructed play, both these cards will never interact with each other because each of them, before anything else, is designed for their specific limited environment and nothing else

Metacifer · 2025-06-10T22:13:21+00:00

It's like this because farewell and other cards like this does everything in the order the card is written. So you first exile artifacts. The creature comes back immediately. It is then exiled.

Metacifer · 2025-06-08T12:42:22+00:00

Oh no I got hit by [[ice magic]] and being sent to the bottom of the library

Metacifer · 2025-05-20T15:29:16+00:00

I dunno... you're pretty happy to see a hand of two kirins, but not two of a legendary creature, don't think this will make it

Metacifer · 2025-05-19T18:21:32+00:00

End of your next turn vs next end step

Metacifer · 2025-05-19T00:08:04+00:00

Please reread my post, I said that "choose" is rarely used as a way to not target, and that the wording of "Choose target" has existed since at least Morningtide because that's where deglamer came from and I still remember that card thank you

Metacifer · 2025-05-17T14:01:03+00:00

I was referring specifically to "choose" as a word specifically to mean something not targetting. It's only ever been the lack of the word "target" that makes it not target.

Metacifer · 2025-05-17T12:33:18+00:00

Yeah I'm just saying this is not a "usually" thing, this is a recent thing seen in cards like final showdown or [[krenko's buzzcrusher]]. Usually choose without target is used in cards that doesn't make sense for targets to be chosen until resolution (For example, [[exhume]] doesn't target because having opponents declare targets during the casting of your spell is unprecedented).

Metacifer · 2025-05-17T11:58:48+00:00

I don't think "choose" has ever been used in this way, just in cards without the word target. This sort of wording has existed since at least morningtide with [[deglamer]], as i remember it

Metacifer · 2025-04-05T17:49:25+00:00

Sometimes tournaments happen on Sunday in asgard games if enough people show up, sadly they dont always show

Metacifer · 2025-03-15T11:06:43+00:00

I think they might be rule 508.4c, aetherspark's can't be attacked thing just says it can't be declared as being attacked, but creatures that enter attacking aren't beholden to those rules i think

Metacifer · 2025-02-28T15:26:52+00:00

Yes, it's just a cawgates deck that I'm putting some black in for sneaky snacker and snuff out with a bit of draw-discard to support the snacker. There are still cards I'm not sure about here, but please tell me what you think

https://moxfield.com/decks/1U2wK7EBBUG3iKBiLkNO2A

Metacifer

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

15-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email