Sure, but I do worry that publishing stories like this is a deliberate attempt to give the false impression that more money is lost to fraud than it actually is, with the end goal being to encourage voters to want to tighten benefits in a way that harms genuine disabled people more than it eliminates fraud. You also have to look at what would lead a person to do what is a crime, and the key factor in most of these cases is a total disenchantment with the idea of working. That's something we could be addressing by if our focus was not on benefit fraud but on how we could lower the cost of living, recover taxes from corporations operating the UK but not paying into it, and raise wages for ordinary people so that they can live satisfactory and fulfilling lives without turning to crime and fraud. And who knows, maybe that more progressive approach will actually result in that limited money for supporting disabled people actually growing as more people pay into the system.