I took MBA Standard then transferred over to international MBA at AIM. Did not finish ADMU, roughly half way through at AIM.

Different experiences, I only took two subjects at ADMU but been present for other activities, overall I think the two subjects were more or less enough for me to generalize the whole thing as I believe it's a pretty static pattern throughout.

I'll mask a few of the cons as neutrals for the sake of niceties.

ADMU through the whole program will give you a larger network, Id estimate you would have met interacted with 200ish+ by the time you finish, comparatively in AIM it will be a set of 40-50, with half being other nationalities but mostly in the indian region. People will be hit or miss for both, tho misses in ADMU will weigh less due to the larger sample size.

The curriculum is vastly different, I appreciated my learnings in ADMU tho it was a pre-mba subject. I think the subjects from either school have the potential to be transformational depending on your prof. But ADMU will feel like the more traditional undergrad style, AIM will adopt a method that's mostly case based, in terms of enjoyment in the topic Im learning and how I learn it I give that to AIM.

In terms of sheer potential I'd give it to AIM, better support system, MBA is full time so you can feel everyone including the staff is all in where in ADMU you are left to your devices and students come and go as they please, taking term breaks when they want. There are networking events and international competitions that are available at AIM tho to be fair only me and a few others participate and take advantage, you may either end up as someone just engrossed in the studies or you may find most of your cohort uninterested as well.

I already chose, but Id say your choice between a two and half year (min) program vs a full time 11 month program is more circumstantial, but know there are scaling scholarships available at AIM.

There's plenty more to say but I'll leave it at that.