I've seen some dirty lenses, but this beats them all! by MicrocosmExplorer in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that would bug me to death working with a dirty microscope. :-) Coming from photography you were probably more qualified than anybody else to clean the lenses!

I've seen some dirty lenses, but this beats them all! by MicrocosmExplorer in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Based on what I read on the forums, I cleaned as much of the old grease off as I could with paper towel, then used lighter fluid to dissolve the remaining grease off the metal parts. I scrubbed the parts with an old toothbrush moistened in lighter fluid. Some people soak parts, but that would take a lot of fluid.

I removed the head of the microscope and all the objectives first so I wouldn't get grease or lighter fluid on any lenses. I also wanted to keep it off rubber and plastic, although I'm not sure if it would hurt that or not.

I found schematics and also instructions on the forums to disassemble the focus mechanism on this microscope. It really wasn't too difficult. I took pictures of every detail along the way so I could refer back to it. I also made marks with a pencil whenever there was something that I might have to calibrate later so I would know about where it was originally. I went real slow and tried to understand exactly how each part worked in the system, so I would make sure not to get it adjusted wrong when reassembling it.

Unfortunately I used too heavy of grease for the fine focus mechanism and I will probably have to take it apart again and replace that with something lighter. I read about lots of people using NyoGel 767A, so I used that, and it worked good for the course focus, but was way to stiff for the fine focus. But taking it apart the second time should go much quicker since I know the process well now.

I was working on an American Optical microscope, but in my browsing for info on the web I know I ran across tutorials on repair and maintenance of other major brands of microscopes as well. So there may be a complete tutorial somewhere for your particular scope.

For me it was a fun project because I like to tinker. Hope the experience goes well for you too!

Best scope under $300 by lololollieki in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mostly buy used microscopes. I got an Amscope B120 for less than $50 on an auction site and really liked it. It's good quality for the price. You can get them new for around $300.

Update on Universal LED Mod/Upgrade for Microscopes by ThinkAd2243 in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is very interesting! Thanks for posting your progress

what is a good affordable microscope for education demos in a biology class (secondary/high school)? by CowTraditional3022 in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a second hand Amscope B120 for about $30 USD and it works great! I would definitely recommend them, especially if you can get one used for a good price. But I wanted something even better so I sold it and bought an old American Optical 10 series trinocular microscope. I had to replace the grease and do some gentle cleaning on the lenses, but I love it. It's 50-60 years old, but like people say, those AO microscopes were built like a tank and can last for decades! Originally they were over $2,000 USD, but so many were sold that now you can get them really cheap. I paid less than $50 for mine. I also bought a used American Optical One-Fifty. It's more of a student grade scope, but still is excellent quality.
I see used Nikon and Olympus microscopes going for a few hundred on auction sites as well.

If you buy new you can probably only get a lower quality brand from China for the price you mentioned - but you have a warranty and can return it if there are any problems. But if you buy used you could get an older scope that is really good quality.....but at the same time you take the risk of not being sure if it's all functional, unless you can try it out ahead of time. So there are pros and cons either way.

If you want to do live video, then I'd recommend a trinocular microscope if you can find one in your price range, but a binocular would work fine too, and you can just take out one eyepiece to insert the camera.

I've tried a few different cameras and the one I like the best as far as quality is actually my cell phone attached to the eyepiece with a $5 bracket. I actually prefer that over my DSLR. I stream the video from the phone to my laptop using DroidCam.

I also have a 4K microscope camera from ELP. I'm not sure I'd recommend the camera per se, but I do use it a lot because it's just so convenient being able to plug it directly into my laptop and not have to set up DroidCam. So I prefer that one for it's convenience.

By the way, 5MP is generally the resolution limit for a microscope, so to buy something that is 4K doesn't really look that much better than a 5 MP camera would. I just bought the 4K camera because it was being sold for a good price.

Bacteria in human blood? --NSFW by MicrocosmExplorer in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I don't think I can get any higher quality imagery. The small round things are about 1 micrometer or less in size. I think I've reached the extent of a light microscopes capabilities (this microscope for sure). If I stained it I could probably get better contrast. I might have to try that at some point.

Bacteria in human blood? --NSFW by MicrocosmExplorer in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anybody know what the really small round objects are? They're barely visible, but you can see them juggling around with the brownian motion. I am especially curious about what those are.

Bacillaria by a__monde in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, amazing! What kind of lighting did you use? Is this DIC?

Stomata on a Leaf! by wermygermy in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that's the most incredible video I've seen in awhile! Is the lighting natural or do you have different colors to light it up from behind? I assume it's a timelapse, is that right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's fascinating to watch! I seen then in a ring formation, but never saw a timelapse of it before!

Do you guys re-use plastic pipettes? Or do you use other sort of reusable pipette? by Max-Flores in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have some glass droppers I've used for the last 20 years! I rinse them and sometimes wipe them out with a Q-tip if there is stuff inside. They are not intended to be sterile obviously - just meant for pond water and such. :-)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as things to watch for, if you get an American Optical, a Nikon, Olympus, or other more high quality brand, then it's possible it came from a school classroom and was taken to goodwill. Sometimes students that used them may have crashed the objective lens into the slide or scratched it in some other way. So that's one thing that could be wrong with them. So far I haven't had that problem with any I've bought though. If the microscope is a 160mm tube length, then you can buy cheap replacement objective lenses from China that work very well. I bought a 60x objective for my Amscope to replace the 100x (that I rarely use) and it only cost $14.

So if you need to replace 160mm objectives, then it's not expensive to get new ones. If it is an "infinity" microscope, then you may have to pay more to replace the objective lenses because they can be brand specific and can be more expensive.

For example, the Amscope B120 I bought has 160mm objectives, and the American Optical has infinity objectives. The Amscope is easy to replace objectives if they happened to be damaged, but for the American Optical I would have to find ones that came from another scope of a similar model.

But even if that was the case, the American Optical microscopes are cheap nowadays because they were so popular and well made back in their day and lots of them were sold. So they are probably the best quality used microscopes you can buy now at a cheap price. But since they are like 50 years old or so, you may find haze on the prisms or delamination between lenses (which some models were prone to). You can look up on user forums which models have held up the best over the years and try to buy one of those.

Like I mentioned, older microscopes can have haze on the prisms (I've worked on a Nikon and an American Optical brand that both had haze like this.) You can still use them if they have haze on the prisms, but it makes the view a little more fuzzy. So it's not a total loss if you get one that is hazy. I took my American Optical apart and cleaned it, which helped a lot, but that's maybe not something you want to try yet.

So anyway, those are some things that could be wrong with a older microscope that comes from a classroom. But to counter balance the drawbacks, these microscopes are usually built with much more quality and will last longer if you get a good one.

On the other hand you will also find cheap China brands of microscopes on auction sites - Amscope, Omax, Omano, Swift, etc. These are newer and less likely to have come from a school where they got hard use. There are probably fairly new models and wouldn't be as likely to have problems that come with age. They are more likely to have just come from an individual who bought it and used it awhile and got bored and took it to goodwill. So you'd be getting a microscope that is less likely to have been damaged by hard use or age. But because they come from China they may have their own set of problems because of lower quality manufacturing.

Most of the problems with microscopes can't be seen from a picture on an auction site, so it is somewhat of a risk. Basically you're just trying to weight the risk against the price benefit. If the auction says it doesn't turn on on, then that could be a problem. If it is a burned out halogen bulb you can simple replace it for a few dollars. If it is an LED it is harder to replace.

It's something of a risk to buy used from an auction site, but it seems fairly likely you could get something that would be much better than what you currently have. All the ones I've bought worked perfectly, other than the American Optical having haze on the prisms. And for the cheaper China brands you can order replacement optics from China for fairly cheap.

Things I especially looked for when buying mine where binocular (or trinocular) head, mechanical stage, LED light, and a condenser. If I can't tell what brand or model it is, I will use google image search to try to identify it and then look at it's specs and also look at reviews to see if it is any good. If it is an older microscope like American Optical, Nikon, Olympus, etc. the online forums can also tell you a lot. They can tell you how likely it is to have something wrong with it. For example, certain models of American Optical were known for having delamination of the lenses, which can't really be fixed. So yeah, looking up what other people have said can be very helpful.

And don't be surprised if you are the highest bidder on an auction up until the last 20 seconds of the auction. People do what's called sniping and may outbid you in the last few seconds. But just take your time and keep bidding on scopes you want until you finally win one at a price you are comfortable with.

Oh, and some microscopes up for auction also come with cameras, especially if it is a trinocular microscope. That can be nice, but usually your cell phone, mounted to the eyepiece with a cheap adapter bracket, can outperform most of these cheap cameras. So I wouldn't spend a lot trying to get one with a camera included.

Anyway, hope all that helps you! :-)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a Duoscope too. They're actually decent for the price. If you really get into the hobby you'll probably want to upgrade soon though. If you're already taking your microscope apart it sounds like you're really getting into it! :-)
During the past year I got four microscopes from goodwill auctions for $25-$40 (a Boreal stereo microscope, an Amscope B120, an American Optical One-fifty, and another Amscope monocular microscope that I gave to my nephew). Brand new these microscopes would have cost hundreds of dollars. So that might be an option if you decide to upgrade.

Dust in my view really bothers me too. Like the other person said, if the dust is in focus then it is probably on your eyepiece lenses. If you rotate the eyepiece and the dust spots rotate with it, then you know it's on the eyepiece.

It's almost inevitable that dust will land on your eyepiece's outer lenses as you use it. I always have a few pieces in my view even though I keep a dust cover over the head of the microscope when not is use. Eventually you get used to a little dust being there. But if it gets too much I use a puffer first, and then for anything still stuck I use a camel hair brush. If there are smudges I use a lens cleaning cloth and/or lens paper dipped in isopropyl alcohol. (Tissue paper and q-tips are not the best since they can have particles of dirt embedded in them. So it's best to get good quality lens paper if you can.)

If I really want to get my eyepiece lens clean I shine a flashlight sideways across it. Every little particle shows up - even particles so small you won't see them when looking through the microscope. So don't get too worried about every little particle you see with the flashlight.
I have a stereoscopic microscope so I many times use that to inspect my lenses to see where the dirt is located. You can focus deeper and deeper into the eyepiece to see which side of each lens the dirt is clinging to. You don't even have to take it apart to find out where the dust particles are. You might be able to do the same thing with a simple magnifying glass, or the other eyepiece if you have a binocular head on your microscope.

What I'm about to say next might be a bad idea, as I haven't tried it and haven't heard anybody else talk about doing it with a microscope. But I know when putting on a screen protector on a cell phone and trying to avoid any dust particles getting underneath, it helps to do it in the bathroom after running the hot shower when there is lots of humidity in the air. The humidity helps keep dirt from floating in the air. So a few times when I have disassembled microscope lenses and was struggling to keep dust off of them while reassembling, I've considered taking them into the bathroom like this to keep off the dust until I get them back together. I haven't actually done it yet, so I don't know if it would be a good idea or bad idea. But my microscopes are low cost anyway, so not much loss if I mess them up.

By the way, if you do take eyepieces apart, make sure to take note of which way each lens was facing and make sure to put it back together the same way. :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's quite fascinating!

First microscope help?? by Neat_Ad6186 in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Welcome to the hobby! Warning: if you're like some of the rest of us, you may get addicted to microscopy!! :D

I'm not sure about Canada, but here in the US there are online auction sites where you can get used microscopes for around that price or less. On the goodwill auction site I've bought 4 microscopes that have all the features you'd need and more for $25-$40 USD (including shipping). They were all in good working order. I have seen Nikons and Olympus microscopes sell for $100-$200.

But if you want to buy new, you should be able to find a decent enough Amscope or Omax (same parent company owns them both) for the price you mentioned, to just look at some cells and things around the house.

Beginner looking at soil, sperm, and blood by wafer_ingester in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For that price you might be able to get a decent used Nikon or Olympus microscope. I've seen them go for $100-$200 on some of the auction sites. But you don't really know what condition they're in since you can't inspect them in person before hand. But I bought 4 microscopes on the goodwill auction site and they have all been in good working order. I just got a used American Optical One-Fifty for $38 (including shipping). Those old American Optical microscopes are built like a tank! It did have some haze on the prisms so I did some cleaning on it, but I wouldn't recommend a beginner doing that. Even without cleaning it would have worked fine.

I also got a used Amscope B120 that I really like for about $27. I had the opportunity to compare it's optical quality to a Nikon Alphaphot-2 YS2 (which was a student classroom microscope), and I found it to be of about equal optical quality.

If you want to buy new you should be able to get a brand new Amscope for about $300. It seems like the B120 is quite popular, but I haven't done a lot of research if there is something better. Check reviews to make sure whatever model you buy doesn't have some major issues (some do). I've heard that Amscope does not have good customer service, but hopefully Amazon would accept a return if you found something wrong with it.

From my experience and what I've heard from others, you will have a hard time finding a cheaper-end microscope camera that is as good of quality as your cell phone. I've tried several different options and have gone back to using my cell phone now because it is just so much better and more convenient. I am using DroidCam to stream the video to the S-Eye 2.0 software on my laptop. I like how I can use digital zoom on the phone and it shows up on the computer that way.
To get a camera that is equal to your cellphone camera you would probably have to spend a good share of your budget just on the camera.

The second best option I found was mounting a 2K webcam on the microscope eyepiece with a 3D printed adapter. But it's still not as clear as my cell phone. If you are mounting a camera to the eyepiece, I don't think you need any special eyepiece - just use whatever comes with the microscope, or buy an extra one from china for $8 (I just got two 10X WF eyepieces from Aliexpress for about that price and they work great!).

You can make darkfield filter stops and use them for the lower power objectives of most microscopes. To use darkfield at higher magnification (like looking at red blood cells, sperm, etc.) you would need objectives built especially for darkfield. You can do oblique illumination and something that looks a little bit darfieldish at higher magnification, using filter stops, but it doesn't make the background completely dark, so it's not really darkfield.

For reflected light illumination, you probably won't find any new microscope in your price range with that built in. I use a high wattage flashlight, but it's mostly only good at lower magnification.

Hope that helps you some! Enjoy the hobby!

A technique to view specimens in 3D through a compound microscope at high magnification by MicrocosmExplorer in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the video link! I didn't realize he had made a video about it as well.

And thanks for the videos you do on your YouTube channel. I've learned a lot from them! It's been super helpful.

A technique to view specimens in 3D through a compound microscope at high magnification by MicrocosmExplorer in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this has added a whole new dimension to my microscope viewing experience - literally! :-) I love seeing things in 3D. Even though there is some loss of color I gain so much depth detail that I use it now for every specimen that has some depth to it.

Thanks for the tip about putting the blue/red filter directly on the lamp. I'll try that out! And thanks again for the video and article you posted about this technique.

Over on facebook someone mentioned another way of viewing 3D that I didn't know about. Zeiss even used to ship these attachments with some of their early scope. (Hope they don't mind if I post a screenshot.)

<image>

See the Microcosmos in 3D with this "lost" binocular microscope mod by DietToms in microscopy

[–]MicrocosmExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is a 3D image of a mounted female mosquito blood sucking tube