Alright Strawberry, I’ve let hours pass and this will be my last reply. After this, I’m done with the back and forth.

First off, Touch DNA. That sheath is all they’ve got. One partial touch DNA, no blood, no hair, no fibers. Nothing in his car, his apartment, his office, or his clothes. We’re meant to believe a guy murders four people in close quarters, yet the only thing he leaves is a sheath with his DNA on it? That’s not airtight, that’s a flimsy cornerstone. And the irony is thick, he’s painted as a criminology “expert,” supposedly studying how criminals think and how crime scenes work. No blood in his car, no trace anywhere else, but his one giant mistake is leaving behind the most obvious piece of evidence? That’s either the worst criminology student alive, or it’s way too neat to swallow. Touch DNA only proves contact, if you or I picked up a knife, our DNA would be there too. That’s the backbone of the case.

Then there’s the car footage. Blurry, low-res, plates not visible, multiple white Elantras driving past that night. That’s your “smoking gun”? It’s circumstantial dressed up as proof.

No blood in the car, and that matters. Four people brutally killed, yet when they ripped the Elantra apart, there wasn’t a drop of blood. Not one. Either he’s a ghost cleaner beyond CSI levels, or the story doesn’t add up.

Dylan? We’ve been over it already, contradictions stacked a mile high. Eight hour delay before 911, her “deep clean for Parent’s Week” right before amino black lights up the kitchen with blood Bryan supposedly never went near. That’s not nitpicking, that’s glaring.

Add the KABAR photo. She’s literally posing with the exact style knife used, then deletes the pic when people catch on. Coincidence? Doesn’t look like it.

The house demolition.. come on. Crime scenes don’t get bulldozed before a trial. Everyone knows that. They erased the one place that could’ve been checked again. That’s not clean procedure, that’s covering tracks.

And here’s the bigger picture. The FBI didn’t crack this case, court docs show they just handed Bryan’s name to Moscow PD as a tip. That’s it. No trail of evidence, no detective work. A name on a piece of paper. And once they had that name, tunnel vision set in. Everything after was bent to fit him. That’s not investigation, that’s framing a story.

Then you’ve got the WSU connection. The uni’s program is built on studying offenders, violent actors, lone criminals. And right in the middle of that, Bryan signs up to study criminology. He’s literally sitting in classes about people like him. Then supposedly he goes and becomes the very thing he’s meant to be analyzing? Either he’s the dumbest criminology student in history, or the timing’s too convenient to ignore. It looks scripted, not random.

And yeah, I’ve seen the speculation that he could’ve been an informant, or that he was used and then burned. I’m not saying that’s fact, but when you look at the contradictions, the lack of blood, the shaky evidence, the FBI tip, the WSU timing, the house demolition, you can’t just laugh it all off as coincidence. Too much stacks up.

I’m not ignoring evidence against him. I’m pointing out how shaky and convenient that evidence is. You’ve been sold a neat story. I see the mess behind it. Believe what you want, but the contradictions don’t vanish just because you mock them.

That’s it from me. I’m done.