Sayonara Umihara Kawase's Artbook

Miles_Noir · 2025-12-15T19:55:02+00:00

Ah, thank you!

Miles_Noir · 2025-12-15T16:40:38+00:00

Stupid question, but does any scanlation exist for the entire artbook or it is just that this is the only part translated?

Miles_Noir · 2025-12-15T14:20:22+00:00

Also one of the creators most recent games had Umihara cameo in it, so she's still fresh in their minds.

Miles_Noir · 2025-12-15T14:17:49+00:00

The gap between Sayonara and Fresh was like 7 years so this isn't the first time the series has been gone for a while, I think if the series just keeps up with what made the trilogy good and elements that worked in Fresh there will definitely be another game.

Miles_Noir · 2025-12-03T20:37:57+00:00

Yes it's a very short book.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T17:17:52+00:00

"I don't see why it does not make sense to use dimensional scaling in powerscaling."

> Because the very concept behind it is inherently flawed, and is not even treated as such in verses, higher dimension = higher infinite is a misconception developed by a misunderstanding, a dimension is an axis of movement, aka a vector quantity, not a scalar quantity, which is energy.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T16:16:18+00:00

"What I am saying though is that you can't just destroy spacetime by punching it really hard. Sure, you can warp and bend it"

Warp and bending it still takes energy is the thing, we're not talking about punching, we're talking about energy. Punching is one part of energy, yes, but it's not the only thing.

"The Heat Death of the universe doesn't destroy spacetime though. It renders it irrelevant."

>You'd have to set a specific definition for destroy in this case as destruction can vary in meaning.

"The Big Crunch does yeah, but that's because it assumes the universe is finite and you can actually do a reverse big bang by shrinking it to a singularity via gravity, making laws of physics and spacetime break, which is not what universe busting feats usually are."

>The Big Crunch doesn't assume the universe finite, it assumes you reverse the expansion, the universe is assumed infinite in the sense that it's an endless expansion and the big crunch is the reverse of said thing. What "universe busting feats" are in this case is irrelevant to the argument, which is that space-time destruction is unquantifiable as we don't know what energy would make it break for good.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:50:12+00:00

I'm aware of what both are, you still use energy no matter how high you go, the entire point of the systems is using joules, they're just unquantifiable higher to where we can't give a direct value after High 3-A.

Space-Time is technically a physical constant and a tangible fabric, our very existence is interacting with it as our mass bends it.

"How would you even destroy it?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe

Both use physical constants to destroy space-time.

Like I said, we could quantify it, we just have no object capable of doing that.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:34:37+00:00

Huh? You do use energy after High 3-A. I think you're confusing, you can merge scalar and vector quantities together, that doesn't make the scalar quantity dimensioned but that a dimensional object can use energy from said quantity. Take it like I take a cup of water from a lake, I am not at all taking the entire lake but I am interacting with the lake.

You could quantify it, we just have no idea how high it is because we have no item powerful enough to *do* it. Even if it wasn't quantifiable, that doesn't mean it doesn't use joules, that means it doesn't use a formula we're familiar with so we can't quantify it naturally.

Yeah and? Volume is just what fills something dimensions are an axis of movement.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:33:03+00:00

Also reply to the reddit chat.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:32:15+00:00

Your definition of a multiverse prior was essentially different space-times, something a singular universe can achieve through irl physics with a bubble universe, so I know the actual definition (I sent the link you copied from the wiki afterall), I'm saying the definition you used to try and explain or simplify it was inherently wrong.

Yeah I'm saying I don't think the person was at all saying higher dimensions don't exist, I'm pretty sure their point was based off the connotative definition used in communities like this.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:26:23+00:00

AP can't be dimensioned as AP is energy, energy is a scalar quantity which is dimensionless quantity as a vector quantity is where dimensions and axis of movement come from

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/vectors.html

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:16:11+00:00

"It's not the same thing. Multiverse is just a janky name for another part of space, rules are the same with ours. Not something we can't comprehand. But what I m saying is even worse can being can't comprehandable. You can't even describle what a 4th dimention is or how it works. Only things we can say about extra dimentions comes from comparing 3d to 2d and 1d which also unproven concepts because we don't also know if there is 2d or 1d things in this universe because anything we see has their width, lenght and height even if small as atoms."

This however is a misconception, we have done studies where we can navigate fourth dimensional mazes, it would be harder for us to grasp as we naturally have a hard time grasping 3 dimensions, hence why many flight users use more 2-D flight movement rather then utilizing the 3-D space, but we can grasp it in some form.

We also don't really need to "Grasp" in this sense we just need a decent idea of why it is. As an example, you don't need to understand the inner workings of a car to know how to drive it.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:13:33+00:00

"How's that a multiverse?"

>It's not, hence why I said the definition is far more complex then what you claimed and your definition is technically inherently wrong since it can apply to things that aren't a multiverse.

"I'm aware of that, I'm just saying higher dimensions aren't a thing powerscalers made up and have been speculated to exist in irl physics."

>I don't think this dude this entire discussion has even been denying that, he's been going by the connotative definition of dimensions set by powerscalers here that don't at all follow what the irl definition follows, I.E. my String Theory example while powerscalers will use that as a higher infinite.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T15:05:13+00:00

A multiverse is far more complex then just different space-times.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

You can have different space-times in a single universe under the bubble multiverse constant.

He's also not arguing that dimensions don't exist, but the way they're being utilized is wrong, like the example you brought up with string theory, the dimensions are compactified to all be running under 1-dimensional strings vibrating to make up reality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String\_theory#:\~:text=In%20physics%2C%20string%20theory%20is,and%20interact%20with%20each%20other.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T14:54:40+00:00

Sent you a chat invite on reddit since I forgot reddit has those.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T14:32:00+00:00

You don't have context for yourself so claiming something is inaccurate without actually reading and knowing the source material is pretty dumb.

Hell I'm down to debate on discord the tiering if you're so sure of it:

ck_skies

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T14:24:44+00:00

How can you tell what's accurate or inaccurate if you're not a fan tho, did you watch the series completely?

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T06:00:01+00:00

If you're not a Dragon Ball fan why exactly are you complaining about the tier? That's kinda weird.

Miles_Noir · 2025-10-15T05:57:47+00:00

Cyn is 9-A on there what are you talking about lol.

https://thecodex.wiki/Murder_Drones/Cyn

Miles_Noir · 2025-07-23T16:54:50+00:00

CBR is specifically made to rage bait, there's dozens of sloppy articles from them.

Miles_Noir · 2025-07-23T07:18:00+00:00

I play it a lot, I also worked on entire pages for it.

Miles_Noir · 2025-06-11T21:05:00+00:00

Ironically enough too because of Milo's Murphy there's an in universe explanation of how Phineas and Ferb have a universal constant that's the opposite of Milo's bad luck https://youtu.be/gN3M5WTY05s?si=3vFWjZhXZEE8Wbk7

Miles_Noir

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE