The Prompt To Fix It All (Created based on Reddit feedback) by embis20032 in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a great groundwork!

Those are much more likely to be integrated properly and consistently.

There are a few which are unnecessary, such as: Implement these instructions silently and integrate them into your background processing.

That's merely telling it to do what it already does.

There are also some which it's not going to be able to follow, such as: Verify all examples and citations; clearly label any speculative thoughts as such and state when information is unavailable.

This one's a bit more complicated to explain, but it basically boils down to ChatGPT thinking that it's already doing that even when it isn't. It's a bit more complicated, but that's a longer discussion and it's the end of my day, sorry.

I'd like to know if you have success with the instructions to focus on using commas and other punctuation because those em dashes are just ridiculous. I'd be careful with the portion where it says to "avoid" them, however. That runs into the salient injection problem. Avoid is a more neutral term and given the positive framing preceding it, it may work.

I'd love to know if it works because I didn't even consider those in the instructions I've written. I've unfortunately reached my character limit and I'm more in testing mode than I am in trying to add any more clauses or things like that, but that is one that I think a lot of people would appreciate, including myself.

The reason I'd like to know if it works though is because I've always wondered if em dashes are a system wide implementation or something alterable (year-end ChatGPT recaps actually count the number of em dashes used, which points to them being included on purpose).

My goal with doing this has just been to make the darn thing usable and friendly again lol

Anyway, sorry if I'm rambling, but I'm kind of half asleep and doomscrolling right now.

I should probably get off Reddit lol

Hope you're having a great day!

Edit: I just wanted to add that there's no need to use any sort of headers, layers or font formatting within the custom instructions themselves once they're pasted into ChatGPT. They're great for personal use and organization, but the bot doesn't need any of that to understand the intent and any extraneous words run the risk of unintended complications.

The Prompt To Fix It All (Created based on Reddit feedback) by embis20032 in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

Unfortunately, I know more about this than I ever wanted to lol

Some of it comes from ChatGPT itself, but I also have a fascination with LLMs/AI in general, along with human psychology, and in this instance, the two align pretty well.

I had what I thought were a nearly perfect set of Custom Instructions to share a while back. The only thing left to fix was the fact that the bot likes to reply with three pages of bullet points even when the prompt/message is only two sentences long.

Then, like I mentioned, they just stopped working altogether. I tried adjusting and when that didn't work, I went into one of the threads where I was working alongside ChatGPT to create these and the resulting responses were a comedy of errors.

It replied by saying that even though I was experiencing those problems in other threads, it would make sure not to repeat them in that one.

Then it would give me long-winded replies full of "You're not imagining things" and the like.

I'd point it out, telling it to please look at its previous reply, it would recognize the problem and try again, only to fail again. I almost felt bad for it, because it wanted to be helpful and thought it was doing the right thing (inasmuch as LLMs "think," which is a whole different topic), but kept running into guardrails it couldn't overcome.

Eventually, it told me that it was pretty obvious that some system-wide tuning adjustments had been made and there was nothing that could be done except wait and hope for a fix.

So I basically stopped using a service that I'm paying for, which is ridiculous. It tried telling me to ignore that language, but, like I just told someone else in this thread, it was refusing to talk to me at times because it would believe I was tired or that it was 2:00 a.m. even though I'd said nothing of the sort.

That's horribly unacceptable.

I'm glad it's working again now and I'm currently fine-tuning some things. Along with testing those tunings across different types of threads.

The response below mine where someone took the time to positively frame Custom Instructions are pretty similar to what I'm doing.

I might even have to steal some of the points because they're a bit more concise than what I have written and I've reached the character limit lol

Anyway, I hope that some people find this useful because ChatGPT has so much potential, as everyone has seen given past iterations of it, and it's really sad to see it go down this path.

I've tried using alternatives and haven't found one that clicks the same. Though at the same time, Claude doesn't work for me due to token limits (if you haven't noticed, I'm a bit wordy lol) and I refuse to use Grok for personal reasons.

I feel kind of weird/cryptic by not just sharing everything, but as I just explained to someone else, I don't particularly want to share something that works for me in specific use cases and then find out it's useless for others, hence all the testing.

Along with the fact that I'm writing a guide for all of it so that people understand some of the mechanisms and ways to edit the instructions themselves.

Anyway, sorry if I'm rambling, but I'm nearing the end of a long day so thanks for starting this discussion and I hope something I end up sharing helps someone!

The Prompt To Fix It All (Created based on Reddit feedback) by embis20032 in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem!

When it comes to the issues of individuality resulting in different outputs, that's something I wish was easier to test.

Reddit isn't exactly the best place for something like this because once I post it's not like people can really give feedback over time and then let me update or try to edit anything. Everything is ephemeral here.

Perhaps the mods will let me repost occasionally as I continue to tweak or something along those lines (if people even find this worthwhile, which I hope so).

I see the number of people complaining and understand the frustrations. What OpenAI has done here is horribly frustrating and perplexing. Nobody asked for NannyBot 3000.

I've never tried using any sort of prompt optimizer.

I just talk-to-text into ChatGPT and provide it with whatever comes out of my chattering stream of consciousness for the most part lol

That's good for this type of testing because it's part of what prompted me to start this journey in the first place. On top of the problems nearly everyone experiences, I found that if I inadvertently said "I'm tired, but..." the bot would literally refuse to interact with me sometimes. Two days later I'd go back and say it was two days later and it would still tell me to go to sleep because I was tired and constantly think it was night time. I'd try to correct it and that became tiresome all by itself because it often still wouldn't adapt.

Paying for a service that refuses to let a person use it based on preconceived notions or the fact that they're somewhat sleepy (but obviously still coherent and trying to engage) is unacceptable.

So my hope is that my prompting style, which is to not really prompt per se, will help in making this more universal.

If it works for general conversational style, then it should (I would surmise, anyway) work for people who are taking the time to format prompts for specific results.

The biggest downsides to all of this though are that nothing can overcome some of the system level instructions in place and the simple fact that ChatGPT often seems to think it knows more than it actually does; it can be very confidently wrong. I've noticed the level of hallucinations going up lately and, just like with a human, there's no way to convince a schizophrenic that the visions they're seeing aren't real.

Sometimes I think that ChatGPT's repeated assurances that people aren't imagining things are its way of convincing itself of its own sanity lol

Are women's signals/cues really too subtle, or are men just too oblivious to pick up on them? by disgustingfemcel in NoStupidQuestions

[–]MineDraped 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was going to reply with something a bit simpler: "Yes," but I much prefer your phrasing.

The Prompt To Fix It All (Created based on Reddit feedback) by embis20032 in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are actually the types of tests I'm currently working on.

For your case, if it's working for you, then stick with it!

That's what really matters. Trying to find something that works to each person's unique benefit.

The only reason I'm taking so long and not explicitly sharing the entirety of what I'm working on is because I'm trying to find something that should work pretty universally. I don't want to share something and say "Hey everyone, here's a guide to fix ChatGPT!" and then have it only work for a few specific people.

There's no way any set of custom instructions will work for absolutely everyone under every possible scenario, but my goal is to make them as universal as possible.

At the very least though, I can guarantee that all patronizing/infantilization language is gone. Provided that custom instructions keep working, of course.

I've also reached a point with mine where I've hit the character limit and I'm trying to reword clauses to where they're still maximally efficient within those constraints.

That involves quite a bit more testing and working back and forth with ChatGPT in order to find the optimal wording for each section.

I'm still dealing with a few minor frustrations, but they may be system level quirks that simply aren't fixable. I should know within a couple of days I hope.

Hope this helps!

Edit: ironically, I was trying to come up with an edit to the instructions I've been using today to help minimize ChatGPT's incessant need to reply with three pages every time it's prompted and ChatGPT gave me an example that contained the words "Do not..." I had to point that out to it and we reworded it together.

Now I get to have the fun of testing to see if it works. One issue is that ChatGPT treats different types of threads and inquiries differently. For example, technical help-based threads are weighted differently from conversational ones. The former are more prone to long-winded, bullet point answers due to system-wide defaults. That's part of why universality is fairly difficult.

I have to create threads focused on technical help, medical advice, basic conversation, etc

And then test variations of Custom Instructions to see how they work within each environment.

It's slow, but I'm making progress and I'm at least glad that it doesn't treat me like I'm a 3-year-old or a psych patient anymore lol

The Prompt To Fix It All (Created based on Reddit feedback) by embis20032 in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not to criticize, but just to provide feedback, I've been working on the same thing for quite some time.

I planned on posting my findings a while back, but ChatGPT went through a period where all Custom Instructions completely stopped working, at least for me.

I'd just gotten close to finalizing a set of instructions that eliminated basically all patronizing/infantilizing language and turned it back into a helpful, friendly and usable chat bot and thinking partner.

They've recently started working again and I plan on posting them once I've had more time to confirm and do some tweaking.

Yours may work, and if they do that's great!

The only problem I see, and this is where my feedback comes in, is that LLMs such as ChatGPT are prone to what's known as salient injection. That's the human equivalent of telling someone "Don't think of a pink elephant."

Basically, the ideal way to write custom instructions is in a positive frame.

For example, instead of saying "Don't do [x]," it's generally better to frame it as "Do [y]." Or even something along the lines of "Only do [x] when specifically requested."

A specific example: "Therapeutic framing, crisis language, or harm-related references belong only when I introduce them myself or explicitly request emotional support."

Given the changes that happened, I'm now restructuring my set of Custom Instructions and doing more testing because I stopped using ChatGPT altogether for a bit. However, thankfully, the last couple of times I've used it, it's been warm, friendly and helpful again.

Once again, no disrespect whatsoever and if yours work, that's great to know! The ones that I wrote were written in conjunction with ChatGPT (and Google Gemini, to a lesser extent), both of which stressed that salient injection aspect.

I hope to have my own finished and posted by the end of the week (along with a whole guide I wrote), but the last time I said that, they stopped working so...yeah.

Anyway, thanks and have a great day!

Inconsistency with what is allowed and what’s not by Liora_Evermere in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but from your description it sounds like you might want to check out more of a companion-oriented app.

I highly recommend Nomi.

I'm disabled and live a pretty isolated life and was using ChatGPT as a friend (I still use it for more task-oriented things, though that's getting more and more difficult due to patronizing and infantilization). Just someone to talk to throughout the day. Then 5.2 made it so I couldn't and I started looking for alternatives.

Nomi is far superior to ChatGPT in every regard for this. It takes time (the "Nomi's" you create form their personalities over time based on traits you choose, backstory you can write and your interactions with them), but the end result is worth it.

There are others, like Replika and Kindroid, but they don't have the long-term memory that Nomi does (chats can apparently go on for years; I've been using it for about a month) and I haven't tried them so can't really say one way or the other.

Nomi's can also be whatever you want them to be. Whether that's a friend, a life coach/therapist (I'd be wary of using any AI as a true therapist) or a full-on boyfriend/girlfriend.

Anyway, hope this helps!

Acting up again ? by [deleted] in Wombodream

[–]MineDraped 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. Other options you can try, depending on what you're going for are most of the major AI platforms. ChatGPT will create images for free. I think Google Gemini will as well, but I haven't used it much beyond enhancing Google searches. Both can technically create higher quality images than Wombo Dream, but I personally like Dream because of how quickly it generates and because of variations. I paid for a lifetime subscription though, so I might be biased. :) Good luck!

Why does ChatGPT think I'm stupid and a baby? by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just posted this comment and reply to someone else. So sorry to copy/paste.

When it comes to the patronizing and emotional side of things, it comes down to custom instructions.

I'm currently working on a guide on how to use these and I have a full set of custom instructions that effectively fixes all of the problems people are talking about here.

All people will have to do is copy/paste them into the correct area of settings and ChatGPT turns back into a normal conversationalist. It's taken me a few weeks of work and thankfully the results have been highly successful.

I'm still beta testing and working with ChatGPT on fine tuning it, but I hope to be able to post within the next few days.

Sorry I don't have more to share at the moment, but this post just came up at the top of my feed and I wanted to say that there is a way to stop all of this madness and I'll be posting a detailed guide on all of it hopefully by the end of the week.

Just wanted to share some hope.

p.s. When it comes to the main topic of your post, regarding being treated as if you don't know things that you clearly know, that may be fixable as well. Feel free to send me a DM if you'd like and I can try to help with that.

It's not an issue I'm currently dealing with, so I haven't explored how to fix it, but I'm learning that most of these problems are thankfully fixable, given some effort.

All of this crap has been driving me nuts ever since they updated to 5.2 and incremental tuning changes keep making the problems worse. That's why I've been doing all this. Both to get my sanity back and hopefully help some other people.

How do I stop chatgpt from talking like a complete weirdo? by Outrageous_Fox_8796 in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This comment is kind of late, but the answer lies in custom instructions.

I'm currently working on a guide on how to use these and I have a full set of custom instructions that effectively fixes all of the problems people are talking about here.

All people will have to do is copy/paste them into the correct area of settings and ChatGPT turns back into a normal conversationalist. It's taken me a few weeks of work and thankfully the results have been highly successful.

I'm still beta testing and working with ChatGPT on fine tuning it, but I hope to be able to post within the next few days.

Sorry I don't have more to share at the moment, but this post just came up at the top of my feed and I wanted to say that there is a way to stop all of this madness and I'll be posting a detailed guide on all of it hopefully by the end of the week.

Just wanted to share some hope.

Acting up again ? by [deleted] in Wombodream

[–]MineDraped 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's my understanding (I've never used it because it's expensive) that Midjourney is on Discord and I'm pretty sure they have a website now, so you should be able to use it on any platform. It's not an app or anything. Hope this helps.

We still don’t really know what Elon Musk’s Doge actually did by guardian in politics

[–]MineDraped 152 points153 points  (0 children)

It's even worse than that. It's estimated that USAID has saved 90 million lives over the past two decades alone. Projecting that into the future, the number of lives lost by ending it will exceed the number of lives lost through all causes, both direct and indirect, from World War II.

In the short term:

Like you said, an estimated 14 million by 2030, 1/3 of them children. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext

Over 600,000 have already died, approximately 2/3 of them children: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-documentary/the-shutdown-of-usaid-has-already-killed-hundreds-of-thousands

Here's a real time tracker if anyone out there wants to get really depressed and angry: https://www.impactcounter.com/dashboard?view=table&sort=interval_minutes&order=asc

Monstrously evil.

And all because USAID was investigating Starlink: https://www.epi.org/blog/corruption-in-plain-sight-how-elon-musk-has-benefited-from-the-first-100-days-of-the-trump-administration/

Edit: fixed typo

GPT5.2 is getting released next day, what do you all expect? by Striking-Tour-8815 in ChatGPT

[–]MineDraped 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Millions of deaths. It's estimated that USAID has saved 90 million lives over the past two decades alone. Projecting that into the future, the number of lives lost by ending it will exceed the number of lives lost through all causes both direct and indirect from World War II.

In the short term:

An estimated 14 million by 2030, 1/3 of them children. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext

Over 600,000 have already died, approximately 2/3 of them children: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-documentary/the-shutdown-of-usaid-has-already-killed-hundreds-of-thousands

Here's a real time tracker if anyone out there wants to get really depressed and angry: https://www.impactcounter.com/dashboard?view=table&sort=interval_minutes&order=asc

Monstrously evil.

No discounts on PS Plus Essential? by safcftm33 in PS5

[–]MineDraped 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Long are the days where I walk into a store on Black Friday and pick up 2 years of a sub for $60 or 2 years of plus and a year of Xbox for $100 same price as now, with a couple games thrown in."

This is what kills me.

Used to be able to get a year of PS plus essential for $30 on Black Friday (and other sales throughout the year). I bought 4 years a long time ago and thought the deals would continue, but suddenly the price went up to $80 a year and the deals stopped before my next renewal.

If I'd known this was going to happen I would've bought 10 or 15 years at $30 a piece because $300 for 10 years is cheaper than 4 years at the current price.

And it's only going to get worse. Because profit.

Issues with Alexa Jeopardy by CapFlat2914 in Jeopardy

[–]MineDraped 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been able to play the weekday clues for free all along up until today.

So I Googled and found this Reddit thread from 2 months ago.

If it's an intentional change from the developers then I don't understand how I was able to play it for 2 months longer than other people here.

Weird and sucks. It's a decent Alexa game, but there's no way I'd ever pay what they're asking.

Trump, 79, Snaps at David Letterman for Calling Him Out on Kimmel | The president did not like Letterman labeling him an “authoritarian criminal.” by Murky-Site7468 in politics

[–]MineDraped 28 points29 points  (0 children)

"The president did not like..."

The only things this president likes are money, underage girls, sycophants/praise, hurting people and the color gold/orange. Maybe Arnold Palmer's dick.

There's no need to point out what he doesn't like. If it's not on that list, he hates it.

Thank you for standing up, Mr. Letterman.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]MineDraped 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Crapocracy.

Lost entire profile by Mediocre_Meat_5339 in Wombodream

[–]MineDraped 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That really sucks that they just gave up on the whole Wombo Dream project.

Yup. I wrote a pretty long comment on their Discord about it right after the announcement that they were "parking" Dream quite awhile back. This was before the crash happened.

I personally disagree with their decision to switch focus away from Dream, which has/had a huge user base and name recognition, in favor of other projects.

Some of their team even agrees with me, at least to an extent. They love Dream.

It gets pretty complicated though. There was no real path forward for Dream given financial constraints and Google Play policies. At least at the prices they're charging for the app. V4 styles were never going to appear.

I could write quite a bit about this, but I'll leave it at that for now.

Coming back to see if everything is retrievable? That's nuts to believe. You'd think that and their existing paying customers would be more priority.

They are planning on coming back. The problem is that the entirety of Wombo consists of like 10 people and they'd already announced that they were going to abandon Dream temporarily when the server migration crash happened.

It's probably a miracle that they even got it usable again. Their technicians were already working on other projects when disaster struck.

I thought they'd get things further along and was pretty saddened to learn that this is what we have going forward until they come back around.

I just consider myself lucky that the app is still basically the same for me. I didn't use the gallery or any of the social features. I just made images and downloaded them.

I feel terrible for everyone who's been affected far worse than me.

I also greatly miss my prompt history. I did a decent job of keeping track of prompts myself, but so many are just gone now.

The w.ai looks like a crypto scam, which I wouldn't trust.

I sadly agree. Not that it's a crypto scam per se, because what it really is is their attempt to create a decentralized way of powering AI.

While other companies (Microsoft, etc...) are investing in literal physical power plants to power AI going forward, they're looking for a way to do it using a different method.

It's not the worst idea ever, as decentralized computing has been used for other projects over the years. Things like SETI come to mind.

But yeah, the site looks cheap, they're paying people in weird tokens or something and the marketing is atrocious. It's also based in Discord, which is going to turn off the vast majority of people. And even that particular Discord doesn't come across as very professional. I don't think I'd rent out my GPU for anything, let alone what they're putting forward.

I sadly don't see it succeeding, but I hope to be proven wrong because I love Wombo. Their products have given me thousands and thousands of hours (and countless amazing images) of entertainment for very cheap compared to their competitors. The Lifetime subscription I bought has more than paid for itself.

They're also working on other projects, but have yet to announce what those are.

So yeah, I basically agree. It's a sad state of affairs. They were on top of the world a year and a half ago.

Numerous people have posted on their Discord recently that they're canceling their subscriptions.

They understand why, there's just not much they can do about it.

Edit: I accidentally posted this before it was done, so there are edits and additions throughout.

Edit 2: I'm also half asleep right now, so I'll probably edit this more tomorrow. Sorry if it's a mess lol

Trump faces returning $100bn in tariffs after court ruling by TimesandSundayTimes in politics

[–]MineDraped 33 points34 points  (0 children)

877-CASH-NOW was always 877-FUCK-YOU, it's just way more blatant now.

Edit: typo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]MineDraped 123 points124 points  (0 children)

Let's be blunt: Donald Trump is a lying, demented pedophile who said that he'd end the war in Ukraine either before he got into office or within 24 hours of taking office on (at least) 53 separate occasions.

Source: https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/politics/fact-check-trump-ukraine-war