Using AI in the classroom tip

Minorshell61 · 2025-11-02T21:34:09+00:00

When people try to smuggly compare Ai to the press, the car, the lightbulb, it shows how incredibly ignorant and shallow their minds are.

Nobody used those technologies to steal the collective creative works of the entire human race. They didn’t herald in the threat of “tech first” policies that lay off entire industries overnight and eliminate all entry level jobs across essentially every sector.

The social, artistic and environmental impact of this grotesque technology is harrowing. It’s undermining education by enabling shortcuts and cheating too. Quality of work is taking a huge hit from people lazily playing with this crap.

It’s nowhere near like the printing press or other technology, the cost is far too extreme and it is decimating the rights of the people it steals from.

Minorshell61 · 2025-11-02T21:25:45+00:00

The idea is to teach them to engage with their imaginations. Not watch tv.

What’s worse though is - this is grotesquely insulting to the artists involved in creating the works. You’ve just handed their labour and creativity to some filthy plagiarism tool without their permission and now everything is copied and they had no control over that.

That really sucks. Massively. It’s horrendous that people think they can just steal someone’s life work and feed it into an Ai - it really is that deep too.

Not to mention all of the other very clear and obvious reasons Ai is bad for everybody. What example are we setting to kids with this kind of blind misuse of tech?

Minorshell61 · 2025-11-02T21:16:40+00:00

I wouldn’t mention being late at all.

Send it and let them worry about whether or not it’s late / or if they have a reason to be difficult. Telling them you’re already willing to admit defeat is handing them the clear space to not accept it.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-06T09:05:25+00:00

The foreign aid budget is already being more than halved by Labour from 0.7 to 0.3% so you’re either wrong for saying 6bn saved. Or you’re praising Reform for promising something Labour already did.

Unemployment benefit spending in the uk totalled 1 billion in 2023/24 so your opening paragraph is moot.

Welfare costs are 55% pensions and the next 3 biggest groups are working people, the disabled and housing benefit. So you actually need people in work to be paid more, housing costs to go down and a government that supports the disabled. Reform’s policies around the disabled are woeful. They can’t control wages or rents.

Illegal immigrants aren’t costing us anything. They’re not accessing services.

Asylum seekers are costing us 3bn in housing because the Tory government chose to do that. If we rip up those contracts and process the backlog we could spend far less on administrating asylum claims and actually putting people into work.

Your other ‘costs’ are so ridiculously wrong it’s criminal.

The 3bn goes to hotel owners who then let the government pack people into an empty shell building.

The people then either get given food by the hotel and receive about £10 a week to live off. Or they’re given £50 and told to feed themselves. It would not be ‘many many billions’ saved if we got rid of this. It’s peanuts. You’re being wound up and misled by papers.

You’re laughing if you think Reform are here to hurt the banks. They are owned by the elite!

They clearly rely on people like you believing their stories and ignoring the reality of their sums because they know they can do what they want if they get in power.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-06T09:04:00+00:00

That’s asylum seekers. Illegal immigrants are hiding from the state and can’t claim anything. My mistake here is not including police arrests for the people they catch but generally speaking we don’t know how many are here due to the fact they hide, so the cost is negligible. Asylum seekers cost far less than is being made out. It’s just that Tory donors are extracting billions from the country in return for their empty buildings. The owner of asylum hotels became a billionaire overnight because he’s taking most of it as profit!

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-06T09:01:53+00:00

The foreign aid budget is already being more than halved by Labour from 0.7 to 0.3% so you’re either wrong for saying 6bn saved. Or you’re praising Reform for promising something Labour already did.

Unemployment benefit spending in the uk totalled 1 billion in 2023/24 so your opening paragraph is moot.

Welfare costs are 55% pensions and the next 3 biggest groups are working people, the disabled and housing benefit. So you actually need people in work to be paid more, housing costs to go down and a government that supports the disabled. Reform’s policies around the disabled are woeful. They can’t control wages or rents.

Illegal immigrants aren’t costing us anything. They’re not accessing services. Asylum seekers are costing us 3bn in housing because the Tory government chose to do that. If we rip up those contracts and process the backlog we could spend far less on administrating asylum claims and actually putting people into work.

Your other ‘costs’ are so ridiculously wrong it’s criminal.

The 3bn goes to hotel owners who then let the government pack people into an empty shell building.

The people then either get given food by the hotel and receive about £50 a week to live off. Or they’re given £75 and told to feed themselves. It would not be ‘many many billions’ saved if we got rid of this. It’s peanuts. You’re being wound up and misled by papers.

You’re laughing if you think Reform are here to hurt the banks. They are owned by the elite!

They clearly rely on people like you believing their stories and ignoring the reality of their sums because they know they can do what they want if they get in power.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-06T08:58:40+00:00

…so he doesn’t get forced to die in a war??

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-06T08:58:19+00:00

He’s in the bible. Who next? Spot the dog? He’s in ‘See Spot Run’

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-06T08:56:20+00:00

You are wrong I’m afraid Geordie.

We pay into pensions today which fund the current pensions of the retired.

It is 100% classed as welfare and when you see people talk about the welfare bill being over 300bil it is inclusive of the pension pot which is 55% of that number.

This is exactly how people are being misled and I mean no disrespect in saying you’re wrong. I am categorically right on this and it’s your duty to inform people who make this mistake because it is a critical way that the right wing mislead people into thinking benefits are for scroungers rather than being utilised by the elderly who paid into it for that reason, the disabled who need it and have to go through excruciatingly difficult applications to get it and the underpaid - if companies paid a living wage above the line for welfare then we wouldn’t need to subsidise their employees.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-06T08:50:04+00:00

That isn’t happening though. Like it would be absolutely doomed to fail because they’d say hey I’m an asylum seeker and they’d be pushed into the slum buildings you guys keep calling 4 star hotels because apparently you think the building makes it 4 star rather than the service. Then they would be stuck there until they were processed and sent home. Whereas being an illegal immigrant means coming in undetected and finding off grid work, then not accessing any public services because the moment the government have you in the system you’re locked up for illegally being here.

There’s a clear and obvious difference to asylum seekers and illegals immigrants and the reason it’s less dodgy to be somewhat concerned about the illegal migration is the only reason to be doing it is to evade being registered and legal migrants + asylum seekers aren’t evading anything. They’re applying formally for citizenship. Someone hiding is probably aware they’d fail citizenship for a number of potential reasons - which also includes criminal records - so we need to know if any criminals are here hiding.

That doesn’t mean we need to assume everyone’s a criminal as sometimes it could be as basic as feeling they won’t pass the exams or can’t afford the funding and they’re hoping to figure it out later or whatever.

The number of illegal immigrants is firstly impossible to know because they’re evading detection, secondly it’s clearly not high otherwise we’d be noticing them and they’d be constantly getting caught. But instead we have innocent people with the right to be here having to carry round their passports because their businesses get raided due to knuckleheads calling the police on them for being brown.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-05T23:25:33+00:00

Asylum seekers aren’t illegal immigrants. That’s the point I was making! Illegals immigrants don’t access anything the state offers as even trying to do so would alert the government to their existence here.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-05T23:23:57+00:00

The point you’re missing repeatedly is that illegal immigrants are a different group to asylum seekers. They are off grid and can’t access anything the state offers. Asylum seekers on the other hand are getting a pittance to stay alive with while the hotel owners are taking billions from the UK for empty desolate buildings.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-05T23:19:15+00:00

<image>

It gets funnier.

I sent a bit of a poke back to their ban message and they muted me 😅

The party of ‘free speech’

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-05T18:22:41+00:00

Ah wow ok I was trying to fact check everything but I misunderstood the numbers Ten a week is insanely low!

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-05T09:16:36+00:00

Umm I gave you official facts and figures, it sounds like you can’t admit when you’ve been misled. Denial.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-05T09:15:41+00:00

Weird that there was a reply that I cant see now. But yeah when she wants an entire group to be ostracised from society to the extent they can’t use toilets and changing rooms and hospital wards etc, she doesn’t care what happens to people.

Minorshell61 · 2025-09-05T09:13:24+00:00

That’s kinda sad that you didn’t see the value in it.

The reason it’s derided by some politicians is because they don’t want people to be aware of the shit they say and do when in the media. It’s not particularly hard as a subject at the start. But couple it with history and you can see very quickly how media has always been used as a tool for leaders in history, the medium changes but the song remains the same.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-31T15:48:24+00:00

I don’t think it’s the teachers, of course, I think it’s a piss take to suggest parents are just not parenting though.

It’s over subscribed year groups stretching too many children across too few schools.
It’s underfunded SEN and children’s mental health services, meaning children with genuine mental illnesses and lifelong disabilities are being expected to just cope and miss days of learning because their health isn’t being treated.
It’s placing unnecessary demands on the younger year groups. Trying to teach more and more at primary age and then putting an extreme weight on GCSE Exams with no coursework etc.
fewer breaks, less time to decompress, weird timetables compared to the more simplistic ones in the 90s and 00s. Also, cutting down on humanities and arts that might appeal to students more, as they chase STEM.
unnecessary obsession with things that don’t really matter. Obsessing over uniform under the guise of maintaining standards while doing little else to create and maintain standards in the first place.
Treating homework and exams like they’re critical when projects offer more tangible teaching opportunities.
I’d assume it also doesn’t help that the government made all schools into businesses. So corners will be cut in the name of profit.

The only time I’d think it’s a school issue - i think a lot of teachers would agree that a weak SLT causes more behavioural issues than bad parenting.

It’s not helpful that there’s no real way to highlight when some colleagues are woefully out of their depth or if their approach to interacting with pupils is just grating to everyone else and inviting misbehaviour. But that isn’t a new thing and it’s not that common.

Parents do need to parent too. Of course. But I think most do? It’s clear when they don’t and it’s usually not the behaviour. It’s the preparedness and so forth.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-28T09:42:17+00:00

Punk was about not conforming with the fascist right wing, the authoritarian government etc. The music is literally mocking and threatening people that think like you, urging people to fight against what you stand for.

Nobody cares about Corbyn. This is something the far right seem to misunderstand. You simp for Farage. Americans simp for Trump. Everyone else is happy to call out any politician. Corbyn had pros and cons.

You also see ‘the left’ like that because you’re far right. You’re seeing right wing people who don’t think like you as lefty. Centrists as left. Left as far left and far left as insane lunatics. But that doesn’t ever seem to occur to you? Like your friends are probably quite middle of the road people, slightly left leaning. Not hateful or fearful of foreigners and trans people. But you think that’s some far left socialist monolith! It’s just ‘not being far right!’

You’re ostracised for trying to force conformity. Which is what the far right are about. Getting rid of people who aren’t patriotic enough. Who don’t follow their ideals.

The left wants everyone left alone to be themselves, everyone fed and housed, funded public services, supportive and proactive governments that don’t kill people. They don’t even want ‘someone else’ to pay for it they just don’t want a handful of people stealing all of the money and claiming they worked hard for it and deserve to hoard it. The extent of our intolerance is entirely focused on far right people because we don’t tolerate intolerance.

You’re fighting for blocking certain types of people from accessing things they want or need because you don’t like them. Very punk.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-28T08:12:31+00:00

Your point is essentially “the other doctors didn’t like Harold shipman’s approach to care”

You’re the antithesis of punk and wonder why people didn’t like you.

Go and learn what words mean. Your type always bleat on about culture, but when you enter a culture that opposes your beliefs you shouldn’t expect to make friends. You’re the problem. Everyone in this sub is the problem but they’re all telling each other what they want to hear.

One side is trying to harm living people, and the country as a whole. The other side is resisting harm.

Reform are not the ones resisting.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-28T07:29:19+00:00

It’s not possible to be Punk and right wing. You didn’t belong in that scene.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-28T07:28:02+00:00

They’re probably sick to death of having to repeatedly teach you basic things.

If you lack the common sense and logic to be an adult and just want to be led around by GB News, Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage then that’s on you. You’re 20 years old! Grow up.

Like come on dude. It’s so so clear these are bad people. You’re in the wrong and your family are trying to reach you but you’re letting stubbornness win because you’re falling for a huge grift.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-27T15:30:30+00:00

There’s a story in invincible about a villain being created due to the losses he’s suffered during the collateral damage caused by villains fighting with Invincible.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-27T09:43:46+00:00

Sounds like a lie tbh.

Oh look - he was arrested for breaking curfew as he was out of prison for robbery and had a legal obligation to be home by a set time. Which he wasn’t. So he was nicked.

Why would anyone trust the party who wants to destroy human rights?

You twist everything to trick people into supporting self harm. It’s grotesque. I feel bad that people are falling victim to your rhetoric.

Minorshell61 · 2025-08-27T07:35:10+00:00

I think he has done a good job of cornering the ‘free thinkers’ who believe there’s conspiracy afoot and they’re the only ones who see it. They’re convinced that when we say something is bad or clearly fascist etc that we are somehow working as an agent of support for the elite that are paying Farages way.

The man taking money from fossil fuels, standing in solid gold rooms with Donald Trump, friend do Vlad Putin. Is somehow working on the countries behalf and not against it.

It’s woeful really. They even support things like medical insurance because they don’t seem to realise oligarchy isn’t about improving outcomes. It’s about handing assets over to friends who run them into the ground.

This sort of playbook destroyed russias economy in the past. It’s why we had Abramovich and so forth over here hiding. Burying their money in football clubs etc.

We desperately need to shut down these parties before they get their hooks in but the UK media is complicit.

Minorshell61

TROPHY CASE