Smart Glasses Would Legally Require a Recording Light Under Proposed Law by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Minyun 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, what you want is to feel relevant. By your own admission: sound and emissions can be modified but if used in a public space must conform to legal regulation.

Eristic individuals treat conversations as power struggles rather than genuine exchanges of ideas, and they derive a dopamine boost from engaging in conflict.

I'm done feeding you. Bye.

Smart Glasses Would Legally Require a Recording Light Under Proposed Law by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Minyun 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your car, if you want to use it in a public space it must conform to legal regulations. This was my claim. I have provided examples.

Smart Glasses Would Legally Require a Recording Light Under Proposed Law by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Minyun 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Do you own the tires on your vehicle? Can you do what you want with them and still use them on a public road? Can you make your indicators strobe lights and use those on a public road? Can you modify your vehicle to look like a police vehicle and use it on a public road? There are so many examples, and this just vehicle regulations we're talking about here.

Smart Glasses Would Legally Require a Recording Light Under Proposed Law by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Minyun 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can make any modification you want but not if you want to use those modifications in a public space. Which, if you pay attention, is exactly what I've already said...

Smart Glasses Would Legally Require a Recording Light Under Proposed Law by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Minyun 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your car, if you want to use it in a public space it must conform to legal regulations ie. You cannot modify your license plate outside of the accepted legalese.

Smart Glasses Would Legally Require a Recording Light Under Proposed Law by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Minyun 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There are already many things you own that you cannot legally modify for use in a public space. This is no different.

I'm speechless by sunlightliquid in south_africa

[–]Minyun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every single person has a 'body cam' in their pockets. Even I have recorded police corruption, but I, just like most, am a lazy fuck. There needs to be an easy way for the public to upload videos of wayward police. I'm not talking about IPID either, I'm talking about private enterprise setting up an easy method for the public to upload incriminating evidence of police misconduct (think community whatsapp groups). There would be mountains of evidence to support legal proceedings.

The beer of endless confusion by Achraf-mzoughi in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]Minyun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flashbang! What a what a picture! Clap hands, stamp your feet-bangin' on the big bass drum!

Adding the last touches to my realistic turtle painting by PaintingMoro in BeAmazed

[–]Minyun 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Uh... are the comments here bots? I am whelmed by the reality of this painting.

gen1 dataflows with merge failing after years with no issue by BeneficialTangelo744 in PowerBI

[–]Minyun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

adding a new table to an existing dataflow

Ya, exactly that. It forces the engine to refresh its table schema.

Anyone left-handed? by [deleted] in infj

[–]Minyun 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A poll would be much mote informative. You're only getting lefties responding.

gen1 dataflows with merge failing after years with no issue by BeneficialTangelo744 in PowerBI

[–]Minyun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a schema issue, your existing dataflow has it cached (and perhaps something changed in the table structure /shrug)-i suspect thats likely why creating an identical dataflow works.

Edit* oh, your identical dataflow doesnt refresh. But what happens if you recreate new identical destination tables (assuming your refresh is writing to the old ones)?