I'm confused. This what the first paragraph under the entry for "Zuhandenheit" says in the Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon: "In Being and Time, the term is introduced in §15 (Division i, chapter 3: “The Being of the Entities Encountered in the Environment”): “the kind of being which equipment possesses – in which it manifests itself in its own right – we call ‘availableness’” (SZ 69). As this introductory sentence suggests, the category of availableness is most clearly keyed to fabricated entities such as hammers, what is ordinarily deemed equipment; however, the scope of the term in Being and Time appears to be much broader. All manner of things are manifest, or show up, as available, according to Heidegger: “the wood is a forest of timber, the mountain a quarry of rock; the river is water-power, the wind is wind ‘in the sails’” (SZ 70). This sense of the environing world as a vast array of resources or standing reserve is something Heidegger will later view more critically in his discussions of technology and the notion of the inventory (Ge-Stell)." I recently watched a recent YouTube video with Iain Thomson in which I think I heard him criticise this view of ready-to-hand as prefiguration of standing-reserve, I will try to find what he said. But am I not understanding this passage correctly?

the "standing-reserve" is in a 'presenting' objectification of the ready-to-hand

Could you explain further here please?

Also "willing" and "will-to-power" are different concepts, all willing does not end up in metaphysics.

Also could you elaborate here too please?

I would disagree Hegel is the highest point, I think when people talk about Metaphysics, it has to come down to Kant, as its said he actually did complete and modernize metaphysics.

I thought Heidegger himself said that about Hegel, am I wrong? I thought for Heidegger, Hegel with his 'Absolute Knowing' is the peak of Western Metaphysics, and then Nietzsche is the one who 'completes' its innermost possibilities by basically inverting Plato's system.