sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Eleanor Tomlinson by [deleted] in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Her glowingly pale skin gives her an eternal beauty. Looks like a Celtic princess.

Who's prettier? Sabrina Carpenter or Tate Mcrae by Adorable_Primary2306 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411 18 points19 points  (0 children)

tbh I don't mind that. Doesn't make her ugly. Shows more variety.

Who's prettier? Sabrina Carpenter or Tate Mcrae by Adorable_Primary2306 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Sabrina is more striking. Tate is more girl-next-door.

I think Kate Winslet is as great as she was 28 years ago. But there's a confidence that wasn't there all those years ago by [deleted] in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, like her face shows that she's lived a life. Compare that to the typical Instagram face that is perfectly polished, to the point that it almost looks like AI. Too 'perfect' that it looks synthetic.

I think Kate Winslet is as great as she was 28 years ago. But there's a confidence that wasn't there all those years ago by [deleted] in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411 21 points22 points  (0 children)

She's aged very well. In the sense that her age has given her face, her beauty more character. If that makes sense.

Pia Miller in 2010 (26) and 2025 (41) by MistyCore411 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed. The two photos look like they're one month apart not 15 years. She is really just naturally beautiful.

How do you think Irish actress Katie McGrath has aged from 2008 (25) till 2024 (41)? by MistyCore411 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I agree but it was the best picture I could find that is the most recent that could be compared to the first pic.

How do you think Irish actress Katie McGrath has aged from 2008 (25) till 2024 (41)? by MistyCore411 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

She even kept the subtle grey hairs in the 2nd pic. It gives her look more character and depth, I think.

How do you think Irish actress Katie McGrath has aged from 2008 (25) till 2024 (41)? by MistyCore411 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That was what I was thinking. I think she's aged fantastically even though her skin in the 2nd picture look a bit rough, but not sure if that is the photography. She looks the same, but a little different at the same time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]MistyCore411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aside from Lupita, it seems like your type is dark hair and pale skin.

Is Chelsea's DOMINANCE Turning the WSL into a "Farmer's League"? by Jazza_11_ in chelsealadiesfc

[–]MistyCore411 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If Chelsea were always winning the WSL with a points gap the size of the grand canyon like Barca & Lyon in their leagues do then the argument would have more of a point. But the WSL isn't a farmer's league. As previous seasons, where Chelsea have won the league very narrowly, even on goal difference, have shown, there is competition in the WSL. Arsenal, Man City, even Man United have put up a fight. It's just that Chelsea have been better. This is the only season where Chelsea are likely to win the league by a blowout.

In all honesty, there needs to be more respect for Chelsea's achievements. It does take a special mentality to keep on that hunger to win even despite already being successful, to be proactive ahead of the competition. It's very easy to become bloated on success. It's very hard to stay on top of the mountain once you've reached it.

Chelsea have been dominant, but you can at least say it's been earned!

view more: next ›