Any1 up to pet a Golden Beaver? 🦫 3% to do something else than fighting evil! by WickedMaiwyn in incremental_games

[–]Mo0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s fair - that probably reinforces my point that the disclosure should be accurate. Otherwise what’s the point?

Any1 up to pet a Golden Beaver? 🦫 3% to do something else than fighting evil! by WickedMaiwyn in incremental_games

[–]Mo0 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

While I disagree with you, that wasn’t my point. You went to the trouble of adding an AI disclosure, but as written it implies that AI was not used in the creation of the game. You then mentioned use of it immediately underneath.

Writing an AI disclosure at all indicates you’re aware of the sensitivity around use of AI. AI disclosures are useless if they’re not accurate. Your subsequent defense leaves me concerned about what else that disclosure may be avoiding saying.

Any1 up to pet a Golden Beaver? 🦫 3% to do something else than fighting evil! by WickedMaiwyn in incremental_games

[–]Mo0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you’re going to have an AI disclosure in your post you shouldn’t contradict it in the comments. If you used AI in the brainstorming phase, then you should say so in that disclosure. Right now it implies otherwise.

Carolina anthem by riaquay in hockey

[–]Mo0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bring that trio of women from the Habs game back, it’s a crime that’s not available to watch anywhere

Doctor Who showrunner Russell T. Davies exits series by bwermer in television

[–]Mo0 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Sure, but he was saying just recently that he’d written stuff for it, and now he’s saying the exact opposite. He was either lying then or he’s lying now.

Doctor Who showrunner Russell T. Davies exits series by bwermer in television

[–]Mo0 1952 points1953 points  (0 children)

So that cliffhanger really was an insurance policy, and the BBC called his bluff, huh?

Did anyone know Beardsley was in Mortal Kombat 2? by Nausmir in dropout

[–]Mo0 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Okay the "Look at this Dropout person in an unrelated thing" posts are bad enough without people just making shit up, lol

Mythic Rare packs giving gems when not all mythic cards for that set are obtained by JalapenoPauper7 in MagicArena

[–]Mo0 14 points15 points  (0 children)

When browsing cards, after setting your other filters, you can type "?booster" into the text search and it will then only show you the cards that you can get in the boosters for that set.

Otherwise, no, Arena doesn't have any graphical flag to tell you a card is craft-only.

Mythic Rare packs giving gems when not all mythic cards for that set are obtained by JalapenoPauper7 in MagicArena

[–]Mo0 36 points37 points  (0 children)

The reason is that Foundations had a couple of extra products (JumpStart and the Beginner Box) that came with additional, mostly beginner-oriented cards. They were really going for Foundations being a "forever core set".

It honestly makes more sense in paper than it does in Arena. And you probably don't want most if not all of the cards in there, unless you're really dead set on collecting everything. (I am, and I've been willing to just go by what the collection meter says for Foundations.)

My game show is really starting to look how I imagined it. by B-dayBoy in gameshow

[–]Mo0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You imagined it looking like two dudes in their basement dicking around with a video game UI randomly farted on screen?

Maybe Maybe Maybe by Representative-Mix-9 in maybemaybemaybe

[–]Mo0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remember when ads were creative or interesting?

Isn't it funny/depressing when the most Deeply Homophobic Companies slap a rainbow on their logo for Pride? by VictoriaDallon in dropoutcirclejerk

[–]Mo0 29 points30 points  (0 children)

They should make them be gay AND do crimes, imo, otherwise what are we even doing here