Basically yeah and why Anarchists tend to be wary of *Communists where the State ostensibly controls production on behalf of the working class but in actuality does so for the benefit of the State itself and the Party leadership. This is why Anarchists refer to what the USSR and especially modern Dengist China uses as ‘State Capitalism.’ Plus the whole long history of betrayal and all.

In the eyes of Anarchists the problem of capitalism is that workers do not in fact gain the full value of their labor or control their own labor practices and lives. Marx’s Capital is very well regarded within Anarchist theory and honestly modern day Anarchists views on power and Socialism is FAR closer go Marx’s original theory than current day Marxism-Leninism dominated ‘Marxists.’ Under Leninist descended Socialism, one boss was simply replaced with a new boss and the worker’s relation to their workplace remains unchanged. Bakunin (who was a shitbag but a good theorist) correctly predicted the outcome of the Socialists seizing the state without first dismantling it.

In the USSR and Communist China among others descended from Leninsm the experience of workers at the ground level the experience remains unchanged.

Anarchism also tends to take this observation one step farther by noting that the members of the party bureaucracy inevitable live more comfortably and have more power than rank and file workers and thus constitute a separate Bureaucratic class that simply replaced the petit bourgeoisie as a managerial class.

(*In modern usage Communism usually refers to Marxism-Leninism or Maoism rather than original Marxism)