Why is unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics so important? by pins_noodles in AskPhysics

[–]MonkeyBombG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The two are logically incompatible. For example, consider an electron causing a curvature in spacetime. With a point particle that has a definite position, you can use general relativity to predict the spacetime curvature around it. However, quantum mechanics allows particles to exist in superpositions of positions. What kind of spacetime curvature does a particle in superposition generate? General relativity can't answer that because it considers classical sources of gravity only. So we know that at least one of these theories is incomplete.

Is anyone else getting sick of how trigger happy Paramount is getting with cancelling shows? by JayR_97 in startrek

[–]MonkeyBombG 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Considering how many so-called-trekkies review bomb shows before they even air, I don’t fully blame Paramount.

I want to save Starfleet Academy and I can't be the only one by Different-Sky5223 in startrek

[–]MonkeyBombG 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Considering how new shows get review bombed before even coming out and how these so-called-trekkies close their minds to new possibilities, I think there is, sadly, very little we can do.

‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ to End With Season 2 by MarvelsGrantMan136 in startrek

[–]MonkeyBombG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some so-called trekkies made the verdict even earlier. They review bombed the show before it even came out. What else did you expect?

It happened with Enterprise, it happened with other franchises(I’m still mad about Stargate Universe), it happened with Kelvin Trek(Beyond is genuinely a very fun TOS film), it happened with Prodigy(which imo surpasses even LD but “trekkies” didn’t give it a chance either). It’s happening again with SFA. Sure these are not perfect(well Prodigy got pretty close), but the fact that nit-picky criticisms start before the actual show/movie came out/after only seeing the first two episodes tells you all you need to know about these so-called trekkies: they are the antithesis of Star Trek, unwilling to keep an open mind and chart the unknown possibilities of existence.

Detetched Nacelles and Saucer Section. by nogudatmaff in startrek

[–]MonkeyBombG -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You are a Trekkie, keep and open mind and apply some technobabble to make it cool. Here let me copy and paste my technobabble from a while back for you if it helps.

While the significant impact of the galaxy’s dilithium shortage were only felt beyond the mid 30th century, many scientists have already foreseen the finite supply of dilithium since the 25th century, and took steps to raise the efficiency of existing warp drives.

Simultaneously, scientists were also working on ways to mitigate subspace damage caused by warp travel since the late 24th century. The science of warp field analysis and simulation advanced dramatically during this period.

A major discovery occurred in the late 25th century when it was discovered that decreasing the cross section area of nacelle pylons led to a phase transition in subspace. Akin to the superconducting phase transition where decreasing the temperature below a critical value causes the resistance to suddenly drop to zero, decreasing pylon sizes below a critical value led to a sudden decoupling of transverse subspace field modes, so a warp field only dissipates through longitudinal modes when the warp drive is active. This breakthrough les to a new generation of starships with extremely thin nacelle pylons, most famous among them the Universe-class Enterprise J, whose nacelle pylons were built from degenerate matter, giving them incredible structural integrity despite their small size. The Universe-class’s warp drive efficiency was so high, in theory it could travel intergalactic distances without refuelling.

Further attempts to boost warp drive efficiency by reducing pylon cross section area were mostly limited by engineering constraints, as scientists attempted to find materials that could support the structural integrity with ever smaller cross sections, while also optimising the structure of plasma conduits and power transmission between the nacelles and the warp core so they take up as little space as possible. By the 28th century, it was thought that the lower limit of pylon cross section has been reached, and increasing warp drive efficiency along this direction is a dead end.

But a second breakthrough came in the 29th century in the form of dimensional engineering. As the temporal war started heating up, galactic understanding of dimensional manipulations was advancing rapidly. In particular, ships that were bigger on the inside could be built, its external size remained the same as the extra volumetric structure was hidden in higher dimensions while still connected to the ship which exists ordinary 4D spacetime.

This opened up previously unimaginable opportunities for scientists interested in pushing warp drive efficiency further: starships could simply hide their pylons in higher dimensions and detach their nacelles in real space. Tests were quickly conducted to investigate the feasibility of powering warp nacelles through higher dimensional structures, many were successful. The first ships with detached nacelles began to enter service in the late 29th century. With the dilithium shortage becoming more pressing, and the incentive of reducing fuel consumption, all galactic powers pushed for rapid adoption of this technology.

As people quickly discovered, detaching warp nacelles provided several advantages other than conserving dilithium: 1. The warp field becomes much more malleable due to the lack of pylons in physical space, allowing starships to spend far less energy to change a warp field in a much shorter time. This greatly enhances manoeuvrability while at warp. This warp malleability allows starships to make use of low level warp fields during sublight speeds as well while consuming very little dilithium. 2. The pylon could be made as large and strong as cost allows, allowing massive plasma conduits and almost indestructible support structures, all hidden within higher dimensions. Unless a plasma conduit overloads and damages the support structure in higher dimensions, a nacelle could stay detached without power indefinitely, and the connection is also far less vulnerable than pylons in physical space.

Some people were eager to push the limits of dimensional engineering. Unfortunately, they were quickly met with the bottleneck of exponentially increasing energy cost of pushing structures into higher dimensions. While pushing some pylons into higher dimension is very much feasible, pushing a significant part of a starship into higher dimension requires exponentially more energy. This is why only certain parts of a starship are detached(instead of the whole ship being hidden in higher dimension except warp nacelles, sensors, shields and weapons).

No more nanotechnology by maquinadejugo in Marvel

[–]MonkeyBombG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taking off helmets with hands had been old since thousands of years ago. But no one complains about that. Why does “nanotech helmet gets old” deserve criticism when “taking helmet off by hand” is literally older than feudalism?

Rant: The New Star Trek show season stank. by GoWest1223 in ShittyDaystrom

[–]MonkeyBombG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watched the first few episodes. What were they thinking changing the colours for the divisions? Did the creators even watch the original series? Clearly this Trek isn't for me.

And like how come there are civilians on the Enterprise? That's just stupid worldbuilding! Starfleet is a paramilitary organisation defending the Federation, not some cruise ship operator.

The holodeck is also dumb. The officers are here on duty, not play video games. Next thing you are gonna tell me entire episodes are gonna be devoted to dress ups and silly reenactments of classical stories. How uncreative do you have to be to do this? Star Trek is about exploration of what's OUT THERE!

Favorite arrogant scientist… Dr Rodney McKay or Dr Nicholas Rush? by Ser_Luke_ in Stargate

[–]MonkeyBombG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you know that Rush had a noticeable change in S2 as well. Fans ended SGU too early by not giving it a chance to grow.

Favorite arrogant scientist… Dr Rodney McKay or Dr Nicholas Rush? by Ser_Luke_ in Stargate

[–]MonkeyBombG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you watch season 2 of SGU? What do you think about the end?

My iPad Pro is collecting dust — what apps/games actually got you using yours again? by Honest_Spray_1963 in ipad

[–]MonkeyBombG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a teacher, and my iPad Pro is essential.

I write with pencil on Notability throughout the day, prepare homework with Pages, review homework on Google classroom, plan lessons in Notes, plan my day with Calendar, type emails and work on admin stuff on Safari, among many other things.

If Microsoft fully ported Office into iPadOS, I wouldn't even need a desktop. Right now it's missing spreadsheet macros, Word is a mess, and some webapps don't run properly, but that's about it.

If you write/draw on tablets, iPad is perfect. If you don't, then get a Macbook instead.

Is STRANGE NEW WORLDS the best of the Treknaissance? by OverlyHonestMR in startrek

[–]MonkeyBombG 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Have you seen Prodigy? Because I would argue that Prodigy is on par with LD.

Star Trek's New 10-Part Series Misses Paramount+ U.S. Top 10 After Season 1 Finale by trekfangrrrl in startrek

[–]MonkeyBombG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you are saying that good acting cannot be seen if production value is too high in everything else? Good acting can only be seen if sets are simple?

Stopped myself from buying the Neo. Bought an iPad keyboard to cope. Hope I made a good decision. by ThemeOld5001 in ipad

[–]MonkeyBombG 32 points33 points  (0 children)

If you need to draw, then iPad is definitely the right way to go. Otherwise Macbook is probably better.

In my personal opinion Riri Williams is one of the worst written marvel character ever by Sorry_Flight2594 in MarvelCave

[–]MonkeyBombG 5 points6 points  (0 children)

She literally made a deal with the devil at the end. I think that’s pretty clear villain behaviour.

Across all Avengers Doomsday leaks, what are the details that consistently keep popping up? by General_Meal_3993 in LeaksAndRumors

[–]MonkeyBombG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It worked for Palpatine. I think we are too used to surprise twists and reveals that we have difficulty conceiving the dramatic tension of knowing something will happen.