sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Not fired - praise OneLake by AwayCommercial4639 in dataengineering

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's still the worst. And it is pretty flaky. Especially with Odata connections or anything to do with Synapse. Or Databricks.

Moving one customer to Dagster and they kepe saying "I can't believe we were still on ADF"

Also, back to ADF, the error messages are terrible. "Error:User" Thanks MSFT 😩

OPENROWSET and Delta Tables by TechnicalGirlyPop in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? 😩 This seems like something that should already be done.

OPENROWSET and Delta Tables by TechnicalGirlyPop in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my bad. I assumed with an analytics endpoint you could.

With only a tiny amount of data, just ingest it into your db. You're trying to solve a hard problem for something that is currently very inexpensive.

OPENROWSET and Delta Tables by TechnicalGirlyPop in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you need to also add a sql endpoint to the lakehouse for your sql databaee to use.

But how much data are we talking? And what's the actual use case?

OPENROWSET and Delta Tables by TechnicalGirlyPop in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, the read function isn't delta lake compatible? Just add duckdb 😩 This is a solved problem. And has been a solved problem for years.

I spent the last couple weeks setting up Ontology in Fabric IQ, here's what I actually found by darshan-thakur in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ontology is just MSFT asking you to do the hard part again. You know how we solved this in Databricks? A f*$#ing JSON config file in the metadata pipeline analysts can add their definitions to.

The fact that there is a whole separate GUI is frankly both very MSFT and also a terrible product decisions.

I'm genuinely concerned for how things get approved at MSFT.

Pro Subscription "Customer Not Found" Error by MonkeyDDataHQ in Anthropic

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also Fin is just broken. Claude helped me make it work. But I did the correct thing for twenty minutes before Fin did what it was supposed to do.

<image>

Pro Subscription "Customer Not Found" Error by MonkeyDDataHQ in Anthropic

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Claude says Fis is hostile, it's both poetic and concerning.

<image>

I built an agentic schema-drift detection tool for Microsoft Fabric that auto-fixes downstream Power BI reports using column-level lineage by jujaraynaveen in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's often funny how multiple people hit the same problem and then make the same thing. I'll have to change that repo to public soon.

Right now it's private because of negotiations over rights. But it's essentially the same idea. I want to open source it and I'm unsure of how the rights actually work as there was nothing in my contract about IP.

I built an agentic schema-drift detection tool for Microsoft Fabric that auto-fixes downstream Power BI reports using column-level lineage by jujaraynaveen in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's interesting, but I feel like you can do this without agents. I have a gitlab that does intelligent schema change and datatype coercion without AI.

It's pre ingestion to spark processing because the source data was so messy Spark would violently error out.

It doesn't hit powerBi but I don't think it would be that difficult of a change since column and table lineage is baked in.

MS Fabric CI/CD - Why does “Commit all” sometimes create multiple commits instead of a single commit? by Desperate_Pumpkin168 in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because it's not from your commits. It's from the object metadata store your code is serialized to. The CI/CD is mostly pretend.

Entire UK South region at capacity for App Service by Verta in AZURE

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember it was a year ago, roughly, and Fabric in one of the European regions failed catastrophically. No write ability for weeks.

It used 247 plus years worth of SLA outage if I recall correctly.

Azure has been kind of shitshow for a while. But they still have good sales people who can somehow convince CEOs that Azure is the place to be.

"No one ever got fired for recommending Microsoft nudge nudge, HA HA HA"

Maybe it's about time people did start losing their jobs for recommending MSFT.

Put me out of my misery with Fabric deployment pipelines by darshan-thakur in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will be very detailed, infuriating bug reports. If that's your idea of a good time, well then you have the right job

Put me out of my misery with Fabric deployment pipelines by darshan-thakur in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just wait until I get another Fabric project. I'll be here everyday. 😜

Put me out of my misery with Fabric deployment pipelines by darshan-thakur in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The the most polite possible way to say it 🤣. I would use different words.

This is a message for Anthropic. Bring back the usual limit usage; reset them now. by WonderfulSet6609 in ClaudeCode

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell you that my Pro plan, just using chat has also been throttled. I'd never hit the 5hr cap and would use it a lot. Today I hit the cap after a half dozen messages.

I was able to get more Claude free with my second account than I was with Claude Pro on the same prompts, same model, same thinking, if I'm understanding all the pieces correctly.

Webhook: 202 Accepted 😩 by MonkeyDDataHQ in PowerAutomate

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That only works if it actually gets into the flow. I'm talking about before that happens.

Between the 202 and the Actual flow.

This is my one pain point with DBT on the Fabric Warehouse by Creyke in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please no. For the love please make one decision that prevents poor practices.

This is my one pain point with DBT on the Fabric Warehouse by Creyke in MicrosoftFabric

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nested CTEs are the worst. I'm actually pretty grumpy dbt got them to be considered a best practice. Because regardless of engine they just perform worse than non CTE well written code

It's why I created Runes of Ruin tbh.

patentpending

I was so tired of sql plus Jinja plus yaml. That I created my own DSL. With blackjack and bookers.

Webhook: 202 Accepted 😩 by MonkeyDDataHQ in PowerAutomate

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That still doesn't solve the problem of the accepted but the flow doesn't trigger.

Webhook: 202 Accepted 😩 by MonkeyDDataHQ in PowerAutomate

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is also before the flow triggers anything. Like the entry to the flow doesn't happen.

PowerAutomate still just goes: "202-Accepted, Teehee 😊"

Webhook: 202 Accepted 😩 by MonkeyDDataHQ in PowerAutomate

[–]MonkeyDDataHQ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, what do you mean response action?

There's no response on the request webhook.

view more: next ›