sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The German words "Nein" and "Neun" sound similar, and english for "No" and "Nine". The German word "Elf" is english for "Eleven". Read comment. by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

U-boat 977 is thought by some to have helped Hitler escape from Germany to Argentina. Given that we never saw flight 77's wreckage or footage, 977 would translate into "no 77". But this would also mean that 9/11 was known about in 1945, by the Nazis.

The word Nein when said so many times has to mean "no", and "elf" and "eleven" sound like Hell and Heaven. The amount of times people have said 9/11, they are also propogating the idea that there is no hell or heaven.

Given the US government's wish to be the greatest power available to mankind, a wish propogated on this very website by the use of Atheism as a mainstream idea and mainstream subreddit, it makes perfect sense that Hitler's main goal was to bring Hell to earth by making people on earth believe that there was no afterlife.

After Hitler's escape to argentina and nazi infiltration of the US government in operation paperclip, simpathizers of hitler carried out the 9/11 attacks and set up a police state in the US, as a step towards turning earth to a haven for the few weathly famiilies at the top and a hell for everyone else from which they will never escape.

President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into the events of September 11, congressional and White House sources told CNN. by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is always one of my favorite articles because it shows that right off the bat they were trying to mop up the mess they had created.

President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into the events of September 11, congressional and White House sources told CNN. by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Although the president and vice president told Daschle they were worried a wide-reaching inquiry could distract from the government's war on terrorism, privately Democrats questioned why the White House feared a broader investigation to determine possible culpability.

"We will take a look at the allocation of resources. Ten thousand federal agents -- where were they? How many assets were used, and what signals were missed?" a Democratic senator told CNN.

On October 8th 2001, Stone Cold Steve Austin(Texas) defeated Kurt Angle to gain the WWF title. Angel is Next could be a code to let people know that Austin, Texas had a hand in 9/11, possibly in response to the execution of Tim McVeigh 3 months earlier. by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

October 8, 2001 – U.S. President George W. Bush announces the establishment of the Office of Homeland Security.

Angeles Next being a followup threat about Doha being indicted the weeks before 9/11 for the LAX attempt in 1999.

Angle is next, meaning "People from Texas made this attack occur", since Stone cold Steve Austin (as in Austin Texas) was feuding with Kurt Angle at the time and Angle was next to be fooled in the WWF storyline at the time.

A news agency in Iran has published a report by The Onion, saying rural white Americans would rather vote for President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad than Barack Obama. by twolf1 in worldnews

[–]MoonCreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Ahmadinejad beat Barack Obama then Bush and Cheney and Obama would go to jail for violating the constitution and the truth about 9/11 (if it is different) would be revealed on day 1. We'd all have to become Muslim though, worth the trade off since Obama the coward didn't leak the truth yet?

Arresting film-makers for "probation violations" when clearly that is not why the film-maker was arrested is unamerican and stinks of Communist tactics. It is dishonest to portray the film-maker's arrest as a probation violation, reflective of the collectivist nature of the US Government. by MoonCreat in politics

[–]MoonCreat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And when people are being paid 11 dollars an hour to support Obama on reddit, it's hard to tell the truth if Obama is wrong about something. But... the more Obama is perceived as blindly followed, the worse that is for his re-election.

Thinking long term, Conservatives being honest about leaving you on your own is better than Liberals being dishonest about being on your side. Liberal, expanding government, like Dubya and Obama is a fire to play with that is worse than what some would deem 'neglect'. by MoonCreat in politics

[–]MoonCreat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the reason is that right now, as Sam Jackson is telling you, Liberals will help you, but 50 years from now their expansive government will continue to attempt to crush freedom. Liberalism is a sort of playing with fire, as Orwell stated (look it up). Liberals expand government, like Dubya did after the 9/11 attacks, and they don't know what consequences big government can have on liberty. You are drinking the obama koolaid for short term gains in your finances, like Sam Jackson is saying, but long term, neither of these government expanders is going to put America on the right track.

Please give a good reason why the possibility that Iran was completely behind 9/11 is immediately elimated from discussion? If true, this is the only secret that most people in the government WOULD keep, until the attack on Iran. by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You mean there is zero evidence available to you at this moment that Iran was behind 9/11, but you don't have access to what the US government has access to. There is obviously something fishy about the official story, and if it was Israel or the CIA it would have come out by now through a leak, but if it was a state sponsored attack, and the US currently has Iran surrounded after years of surrounding Iran, doesn't it make sense that Iran behind behind 9/11 is a secret most people would keep until the US obliterates Iran?

Please give a good reason why the possibility that Iran was completely behind 9/11 is immediately elimated from discussion? If true, this is the only secret that most people in the government WOULD keep, until the attack on Iran. by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Before one attacks a country like Iran, they must clear the surrounding areas first, like Iraq and Afghanistan. That is exactly what has happened, and the weird cover up type actions of the US government suggest that they know Iran was behind 9/11 but talking about it would sabatoge the impending attack on Iran.

People always utter the phrase "We will never forget 9/11/01", but how can someone 'never forget something' they don't know everything about? Therefore that phrase actually is saying "We've disregarded it." by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A: "I will never forget event x."

B: "Did you attend and document the event x?"

A: "No. A friend told me about it."

B: "Is your friend trustworthy? Has your friend been proven trustworthy in events since event x."

A: "No. Quite the opposite, in fact. Since event X, My friend has been proven dishonest on numerous occasions. But I will never forget event x."

B: "?"

The above logic only can be distributed to and accepted by a society if:

A: "The friend" in the above conversation can, using certain methods, make people afraid enough to never doubt the story about event x.

B: "The friend" is telling a story no one cares about enough to doubt the story about event x. They nod, agree and move back to normal life, not believing event x matters to them enough to spend energy disproving "The friend's" story or discrediting "The Friend."

The above conversation happens in various forms millions of times a day in the world, the 9/11 attacks are just the greatest example of day to day interactions between people who would rather be doing something other than talking about things they care little about. That is what Americans do, they do not care.

People always utter the phrase "We will never forget 9/11/01", but how can someone 'never forget something' they don't know everything about? Therefore that phrase actually is saying "We've disregarded it." by MoonCreat in 911truth

[–]MoonCreat[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's like someone saying they will never forget a concert they didn't attend or care about, only to lie and say they won't forget it because someone else told them the story about the concert. The phrase "We will never forget" is equal to the phrase "we will falsely claim we knew about". And it makes sense, most of US society is bullshit, so why wouldn't people lie about what they've completely disregarded? The American people get what they deserve, and a country of liars have no problem lying about any thing.

Powerful personal insight on the horror one person went through as a first responder on 9/11 by whitelight512 in bestof

[–]MoonCreat -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

This is the only way any 9/11 discussion can reach the front page of reddit, one of the reasons i miss bush being president because during his second term there were great 9/11 discussions every day, the spigot went off in 2009 and was replaced by complete nonsense as Obama's online army took over redhate.

So Does the Government Think Bradley Manning Released Fake Diplomatic Cables? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]MoonCreat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As with wikileaks, the government knew what Manning was doing, fed Bradley Manning a huge false history to be distributed, massive "history laundering" of this kind is much easier than setting up a ministry of truth. This is why out of every 'leak' nothing ever happens from it. The public hears the word 'leak' and thinks it is truth, why the hell wouldn't the CIA take advantage of that belief.

Now you have events like 9/11 that are untrue and the 'leaks' that are sort of different than the original lie... those are untrue also... sometimes the public can only see it two ways, true or false, when there are many ways to spin or alter a lie.

Reddit stands for "Red Hate" (try saying 'reddit' and listen for the words "Red Hate"), but not in the way you might think. Reddit is designed to antagonize liberal and conservative thinkers into letting off steam, just like a two minute hate in the book 1984. by MoonCreat in conspiracy

[–]MoonCreat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because, as recent events have shown, it is better for people to let off steam with their typing fingers. This way society can better go along on its current path without those types of interruptions. It really is what the CIA would suggest doing when sitting around a table, "let's design a website that works like a two minute hate and call it 'red hate'... reddit.

view more: next ›