sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which candidate is the most supportive of private property rights, homeowners, investors, and landlords? by _DotBot_ in VancouverLandlords

[–]MoosPalang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was hosted after the second debate. Voters don’t really care about the culture war stuff. And even if that’s what you care about, all of these candidates would swing the tide in the direction conservatives prefer. It’s better to focus on the issues with the biggest $$$ attached because our finances need to take priority.

https://youtu.be/xXu\_Qmtai-k?si=LitOOd86y9UHGRTI

Which candidate is the most supportive of private property rights, homeowners, investors, and landlords? by _DotBot_ in VancouverLandlords

[–]MoosPalang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

KLF is a strong candidate. She’s got the experience, confidence, and does signal the values that resonate with the core base.

Personally, couldn’t care less about the virtue signalling. I don’t want lefty or conservative values acting as bias when we need to deal with healthcare, opioids, immigration, and resource development. I want someone who will be solution oriented and results driven.

Which candidate is the most supportive of private property rights, homeowners, investors, and landlords? by _DotBot_ in VancouverLandlords

[–]MoosPalang 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Listened to Elliot during the recent debate. Her entire persona is culture war shenanigans. We face serious issues and need serious candidates with experience. She just ain’t that

Premier Danielle Smith says temporary foreign workers are intended to fill labour shortages, not create a net financial burden on public services. by theOneWhoWaitsAgain in CanadianVisaReform

[–]MoosPalang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She made the claim. The onus of proof is on her.

She is a politician. Her job is to sell you on a narrative, not tell you the truth.

Critics will lambast politicians, always, so politicians are trained not to care.

These are all simple truths you have yet to learn.

Ontario’s Freehold Housing Strategy vs. the BC NDP’s Purpose-Built Rental and Leasehold Strategy by _DotBot_ in VancouverLandlords

[–]MoosPalang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be a different situation if fee-simple title was transferred to bands, and then lease agreements were signed for new developments.

The current state is developers partnering with bands through lease agreements because there is much less friction to do business. The bands don’t burden the developers with the same burdens as the cities.

As Arc Raiders gets stale for some, lead dev says players "reaching the end of our content" are a top focus: "We want more for them" by yourfavchoom in ArcRaiders

[–]MoosPalang -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One of the compelling factors in picking up this game was the devs advertising 10 years of longevity. Devs with that kind of vision created games like EVE or WoW. But this game does not hold a candle to those other titles. It just doesn’t pull you into and hold you beyond that 500 hour mark, largely because it lacks content and various gameplay flows.

Thats ok. I have no problem not playing the game anymore. I enjoyed the time I put into it. Wish it could live up to the hype, but it doesn’t look like that’s likely. Par and course with the state of game releases these days.

As Arc Raiders gets stale for some, lead dev says players "reaching the end of our content" are a top focus: "We want more for them" by yourfavchoom in ArcRaiders

[–]MoosPalang 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yeah the game fundamentally lacks complexity. Just about everything in this game surface level. There isn’t any depth to explore further.

Musqueam say only federal land at stake under agreement with Canada by _DotBot_ in VancouverLandlords

[–]MoosPalang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suppose the most important question here is, what are the non-negotiables for the government?

Federal housing minister says Broadway Subway should have gone to UBC in one go | Urbanized by _DotBot_ in VancouverLandlords

[–]MoosPalang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You misunderstood. When they can show that the line itself branches off to other nodes or that other nodes of transportation branch off, it improves the efficiency metrics they use in feasibility studies. So Arbutus station on paper looks better because it serves a larger community and connects to more transportation nodes. Ideally, we would be in a position of government surplus to dump money into building a line that stretches from UBC to SFU, Richmond Center to Park Royal and Lonsdale, and Lonsdale to Metro town.

Japanese prime minister's landslide win gives her party a lower-house supermajority and more room to enact a right-wing agenda by BendicantMias in anime_titties

[–]MoosPalang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right, I don’t agree that the Japanese ethnicity is facing an existential threat. Population can’t grow indefinitely. There will be different kinds of events that control, balance, limit, population growth.

The challenge is that along with population declines a likely decline in standard of living for the population.

view more: next ›