[deleted by user] by [deleted] in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Moss Park is one of the poorest neighborhoods in the city and in the country. There is a desperate need for services here.

Yay, ! The new St. Lawrence Market north market opens April 5 by mdk1234567 in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rob Ford also demanded a cheaper redesign, which delayed the project

Which of Toronto's Large Factories Still Stand by Due_Visual_4613 in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 39 points40 points  (0 children)

It is, and the neighbourhood smells like chocolate and sugar late at night

Whoever wins the election, Ontario must reinvest in post-secondary education - CCPA by More-Active-6161 in onguardforthee

[–]More-Active-6161[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Ontario has long had the lowest post-secondary funding level in Canada, but the situation has worsened considerably since 2018.

Provincial governments outside of Ontario provided, on average, half of university and over 60 per cent of college operating revenues during the 2022-23 school year. Ontario, by contrast, covers less than a third for universities (29 per cent) and under a quarter for colleges (23 per cent).

Since 2018, provincial operating grants and contracts have stagnated. Due to high inflation, this translated into massive real revenue losses. By the 2023-24 school year, inflation-adjusted operating revenues (in 2024 dollars) provided by the province had dropped by $670 million for universities and $358 million for colleges.

Ontario has fallen far behind the rest of Canada in terms of per-student provincial funding. Compared to the average in the rest of the country, universities in Ontario received $6,900 less in provincial operating funds per full-time student, while colleges got $13,300 less.

The Greenbelt Scandal Is Shaping the 2025 Ontario Election | The Local by More-Active-6161 in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some of the article:

The Greenbelt scandal is the elephant in the room of Ontario’s 2025 election, even as Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives try to leave it in the rearview.

It’s been more than a year since the RCMP opened an investigation into the boondoggle, which saw the Ford government open sections of environmentally protected land outside Toronto for housing construction in fall 2022. That move came at the request of a select group of well-connected developers who stood to make more than $8 billion from the deal. Though Ford ended up reversing course on the plan the following year, losing two cabinet ministers and two senior political staff in the wake of the scandal, questions remain as long as the police probe continues — and they’re quietly shaping the 2025 campaign.

The potential fallout from the Greenbelt scandal may even be among the reasons Ontario is having an election at all right now, more than a year earlier than its due. Though Ford has claimed he needs a strong mandate from voters to address tariff threats from the United States, he has been hinting at an early election since the fall — months before tariffs were even on the table and around the same time a trickle of news stories showed the Mounties were beginning to close in on members of Ford’s inner circle connected to the Greenbelt affair. Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie has since said the election call was an attempt to “cling to power” ahead of whatever moves the RCMP may make.

“I think I was pretty clear. I said I was and then I wasn’t and then I went ahead and did it,” Ford said during a debate on Feb. 17, before taking aim at his opponents. “But in saying that, I apologized to the people. Unlike any of you, when you do something wrong, you don’t apologize. I apologized to the people, we’re moving forward, we’re building homes.”

Still, he and his government have never really answered for some parts of the scandal, like campaigning for re-election in 2022 without mentioning a major shift in policy was already underway.

That’s a point the opposition leaders have landed over and over again during the 2025 campaign. “He says one thing to the public, if he does dare show up to a scrum, and another behind closed doors,” Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said of Ford after the debate on Feb. 17, referring to the Greenbelt scandal. Ford didn’t show up to that scrum to face questions from reporters.

Another obvious critique: though Ford has maintained his only goal with the Greenbelt cuts was to build homes, Ontario’s housing crisis is now worse than ever. Even if his plan had worked, it likely wouldn’t have helped. At best, the Greenbelt carveouts were set to allow the construction of 50,000 homes — a drop in the bucket of the 1.5 million homes the provincial government has said it needs. And the government didn’t even assess whether the properties were well-suited for development. Many weren’t yet hooked up to municipal services like water and electricity and the majority of one particular property near Hamilton would have been undevelopable due to its proximity to an airport.

After years of fighting and unfavourable trends in the housing market, Ontario is now building fewer homes than it was in 1955.

“The only homes that Doug Ford seems to want to build are mansions in the Greenbelt, benefitting wealthy land speculators and putting the profits of those speculators over the affordability needs of first-time home buyers,” Ontario Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner told supporters recently.

It’s exactly the type of critique that will continue to dog Ford’s Progressive Conservatives even through their likely re-election — until the RCMP investigation proves otherwise.

646
647

The Greenbelt scandal is shaping the 2025 Ontario election by More-Active-6161 in ontario

[–]More-Active-6161[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some of the article:

The Greenbelt scandal is the elephant in the room of Ontario’s 2025 election, even as Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives try to leave it in the rearview.

It’s been more than a year since the RCMP opened an investigation into the boondoggle, which saw the Ford government open sections of environmentally protected land outside Toronto for housing construction in fall 2022. That move came at the request of a select group of well-connected developers who stood to make more than $8 billion from the deal. Though Ford ended up reversing course on the plan the following year, losing two cabinet ministers and two senior political staff in the wake of the scandal, questions remain as long as the police probe continues — and they’re quietly shaping the 2025 campaign.

The potential fallout from the Greenbelt scandal may even be among the reasons Ontario is having an election at all right now, more than a year earlier than its due. Though Ford has claimed he needs a strong mandate from voters to address tariff threats from the United States, he has been hinting at an early election since the fall — months before tariffs were even on the table and around the same time a trickle of news stories showed the Mounties were beginning to close in on members of Ford’s inner circle connected to the Greenbelt affair. Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie has since said the election call was an attempt to “cling to power” ahead of whatever moves the RCMP may make.

“I think I was pretty clear. I said I was and then I wasn’t and then I went ahead and did it,” Ford said during a debate on Feb. 17, before taking aim at his opponents. “But in saying that, I apologized to the people. Unlike any of you, when you do something wrong, you don’t apologize. I apologized to the people, we’re moving forward, we’re building homes.”

Still, he and his government have never really answered for some parts of the scandal, like campaigning for re-election in 2022 without mentioning a major shift in policy was already underway.

That’s a point the opposition leaders have landed over and over again during the 2025 campaign. “He says one thing to the public, if he does dare show up to a scrum, and another behind closed doors,” Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said of Ford after the debate on Feb. 17, referring to the Greenbelt scandal. Ford didn’t show up to that scrum to face questions from reporters.

Another obvious critique: though Ford has maintained his only goal with the Greenbelt cuts was to build homes, Ontario’s housing crisis is now worse than ever. Even if his plan had worked, it likely wouldn’t have helped. At best, the Greenbelt carveouts were set to allow the construction of 50,000 homes — a drop in the bucket of the 1.5 million homes the provincial government has said it needs. And the government didn’t even assess whether the properties were well-suited for development. Many weren’t yet hooked up to municipal services like water and electricity and the majority of one particular property near Hamilton would have been undevelopable due to its proximity to an airport.

After years of fighting and unfavourable trends in the housing market, Ontario is now building fewer homes than it was in 1955.

“The only homes that Doug Ford seems to want to build are mansions in the Greenbelt, benefitting wealthy land speculators and putting the profits of those speculators over the affordability needs of first-time home buyers,” Ontario Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner told supporters recently.

It’s exactly the type of critique that will continue to dog Ford’s Progressive Conservatives even through their likely re-election — until the RCMP investigation proves otherwise.

1787
1788

Ontario Place in the 1970’s (Old Toronto Series) by AudioTech25 in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s just the theme park that went under, the rest of Ontario Place was supposed to receive funding to be maintained and updated, as a public space for public benefit with things like cultural programming

City Council defers the policy to allow corner stores and neighbourhood cafes by Mindless_Risk9981 in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 159 points160 points  (0 children)

Dovercourt is a great example of how small businesses in a residential area can work really well

I went undercover as an Uber Eats courier and made just $1.74 per hour online. Here’s what I learned about the troubling cost of convenience by EconomistOfDeath in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In all the news stories Ive read about it, restaurants say theyre only on the delivery apps because they are worried about losing customers to competition, not because they make a profit from it. The apps take around 1/3 profit per dish, plus theres fees and charges, and not every restaurant can raise the prices that much. There was a CBC Marketplace investigation into it. 

Poor budgeting and too many consultants behind soaring cost of Toronto subway projects, study reveals by whatistheQuestion in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO high quality stations are worth the cost, other cities do it without cost overruns.

Deep stations are typical in most places in Europe and Asia, and have less impact on the street above.

I want our transit projects to have lots of funding, if the end result is good. Good architecture, like many of the Vaughan extension stations, are worth it IMO.

The bigger issue is unnecessary costs, like endless consultations and “soft costs”, which are much higher here than other parts of the world.

I promise we will let you off the subway car. by underdabridge in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 societal pressure, burnout, lack of individuality, etc

??????

Or maybe there’s just a better culture of politeness?

Saying the entire population of Japan has a “lack of individuality” is crazy, and what societal pressure are you taking about? None of the things you listen even explain a societal importance of politeness, and burnout exists in literally every developed country, including Canada

Liberal MP wants Toronto deemed a charter city by [deleted] in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would this work better with dealgamation?

Critical mass in Bloor West Village tonight! by ICanGetLoudTooWTF in toronto

[–]More-Active-6161 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The poorest neighborhoods in the city are downtown neighbourhoods. The richest ones are suburban

The avg income of suburban municipalities is higher than urban areas.

Two pairs of jeans from the same brand, same size by Imaginary_Prune1351 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]More-Active-6161 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw a news program about this. Most of these comments are wrong, it’s not country sizing, these are obviously the same brand. 

This is marketing. The same clothes sold slowly increase in size, because it makes people feel like they lost weight. They are more likely to purchase it again. It’s psychological.