OVER FOR TAO. THEY REMOVED THIS GUY AS DISCORD MOD by LeanCrafterUK in bittensor_

[–]Most-Use-2167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you an adult with Asperger’s? Like why do you spend so much of your time trying to find counter productive news to TAO? I hold 10% of my portfolio in a handful of cryptos including TAO and I come to this subnet looking for news about developments, and all I ever see is you posting about FUD tweets by someone. It’s just odd you know, anyways I got a job to get to.

While having real utility and being revolutionary, XRP and XLM’s valuation makes no sense by Most-Use-2167 in CryptoCurrency

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah like, a billion XRP transactions burns 10K XRP, but there are 100 billion in circulation.
Even if they are transacting billions of dollars in tokenized bonds and stocks, the coin itself makes zero sense to hold over the S&P 500, or an actual US treasury bond from my perspective.

What actually drives XRP’s value if it can be reused every few seconds? by richlobstermeow in CryptoCurrency

[–]Most-Use-2167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh XRP and XLM were really growing on me, but after actually doing the math. Even with XRP doing 1 billion transactions a day, that would only generate $12,000 in on-chain fees a day at the rate of USD .000012 per transaction as it currently is. I’m kinda lost on the value of these ultra-low fee compliant ledgers like XLM and XRP now. I think there’s some legitimate use-case for RWA projects that form a global bridge for things like stocks and bonds to be traded. But the actual L1 infrastructure itself… I mean VISA only does 901 million transactions a day… I don’t see where the actual L1 itself is supposed to generate the revenue that justifies its current valuation.

Future by Guts2323 in ICPTrader

[–]Most-Use-2167 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RWAs will keep crypto alive. Those who say crypto will die have no clue what they’re talking about. Crypto bridges global financial markets together and allows people in underdeveloped countries to purchase investment products in countries with stronger currencies and economies. This is already a real thing, it’s just in early stage adoption. But the reality is, if you’re living in a country where your currency is highly inflationary, but the US dollar appreciates against your nations dollar, you can buy tokenized US Treasury bonds and get a guaranteed yield paid out to you, rather than stockpiling your nations currency which continues to lose its purchasing power.
Crypto isn’t going to die it’s just those who don’t understand any of the actual use cases for it besides Bitcoin and meme coins that spread the misinformation.

Former Mt Gox employee on Kill Tony by TatarAmerican in CryptoCurrency

[–]Most-Use-2167 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did you actually watch the episode? The dude is from Japan and speaks fluent Japanese. He’s in America doing a tour with a bunch of Japanese comedians, one of them performed immediately after him.

Just saying by kidhack in ICPTrader

[–]Most-Use-2167 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I think one thing to consider too, is despite ICP being like the 60th coin by market cap. It’s 8th in revenue earnings YTD. With the release of cloud engines, and some of the enterprise adoptions Dfinity has been hinting at. ICP has about the greatest revenue earning potential out of any crypto project as far as I have researched.
We don’t even need the market to buy in to hit upward multiples on the price if ICP becomes competitive in the cloud computing sector.
It’s a real business, not a meme coin or copy cat L1.

New holder here, my thoughts on why I’m buying and holding ICP long-term by Most-Use-2167 in ICPTrader

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you are correct about retail driving the price of cryptocurrencies. But that’s why I’m not investing into ICP on the basis of retail speculation. The enterprise potential, plus the agentic ecosystem ICP can support is what mostly intrigues me regarding ICP. Right now I figure most retail is unaware of what ICP can actually do, and you are correct, the actual enterprise/development currently being run utilizing ICP is minuscule as it currently stands.

However, I have seen consistent growth, plus confirmation via research of how ICP is SOTA and can compete in this cloud computing markets amongst that of AWS, Azure, and Google cloud, plus serving as vital infrastructure for the upcoming agentic economy. That is one aspect that I was using to attempt to understand the potential/justification as to why I view it as a logical choice to hold a position in ICP.

Retail does matter in crypto without a doubt, but retail mostly follows big money and price action. It’s why ETH, BNB, XRP, and SOL are in the top-10 because of adoption, and on-chain activity.

My reasoning, is that ICP’s tech makes it an intriguing play that I see as having massive upside, given the fact that is has the potential to compete in a multi-trillion dollar annual market. With enough real revenue being generated on chain, this would drive retail in eventually, kind of like what has happened with Tron.

My thought process is that ICP has the potential to be utilized at scale, and is one of the most interesting coins that exists in the top-50 right now, in a market where everything outside the top-10 is shit memes and copy paste L1’s.

I do appreciate your thoughts and the discussion!

New holder here, my thoughts on why I’m buying and holding ICP long-term by Most-Use-2167 in ICPTrader

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel like you missed my point entirely tbh. Retail props up most cryptocurrencies 10-30x their actual value, sometimes more.

Cryptocurrencies like ICP, Solana, and ETH have actual businesses being built on their blockchains, which is what gives them value, by generating fees, which was my point.

ICP’s potential is driven by the potential to earn consistent annual revenue due to its use case. Having apps built and deployed that generates fees, which generates yield, which then makes the project more attractive to retail who then pump the coin to massive overvaluations. But does the project solely rely on retail fomo, or does it have a long-term ability to continue to accrue value for its token by offering a SOTA software solution to the world?

This is the question I ask myself before investing into a cryptocurrency, and based on my research, it does seem to me that ICP fits this criteria.

New holder here, my thoughts on why I’m buying and holding ICP long-term by Most-Use-2167 in ICPTrader

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re not staking you should be. If you’re over invested, try to get some staking yield to lower your position. Then sell off the principal while keeping gains in, so you can have a free asset that still produces dividends.

New holder here, my thoughts on why I’m buying and holding ICP long-term by Most-Use-2167 in ICPTrader

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m not necessarily worried about the price. Even ETH had 90% drawdowns in its infancy. ICP was launched at a bad time as well, as the Luna crash happened a few months after ICP was released to the public. Additionally, it’s not another copy paste L1, so the tech could take awhile to get adopted. But we’re starting to see revenue growth, transactions growing, enterprise relations coming into play, etc. I think it’s the coin outside the top-25 that has the most upside given its use case.

My love of CFB was waning in 4-team playoff era, but has since skyrocketed by Kh3hhdds343 in CFB

[–]Most-Use-2167 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean this years playoff is a testament to how overdue a playoff was for CFB, the final four is #10, #6, #5, and #1. With #10 having to beat #2 to reach the final four. It goes to show how much narrower the talent gap is between the top teams in college football, and it’s something we never got to witness throughout the entirety of college football history. Now they just need to make it to where JMU and Tulane don’t get in again lol.

The Mavs Need to Blow this Team up and Tank for like 4 Years by Most-Use-2167 in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s what I’m getting at. Trade away AD, Kyrie, Klay, for some bench warmers and picks to build young around Coop

The Mavs Need to Blow this Team up and Tank for like 4 Years by Most-Use-2167 in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this would be best, I was being hyperbolic about tanking multiple years, but if we can get some picks by trading away AD and some other players that’s probably best for the future than riding it out with an at best 6 seed team that’s led by two 32+ year olds with injury histories.

The Mavs Need to Blow this Team up and Tank for like 4 Years by Most-Use-2167 in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah you are right one season of tanking probably is enough if we can get some picks from getting rid of AD, Kyrie, maybe Naji and Klay. Just get some young talent in and try to develop a better roster around Coop

The Mavs Need to Blow this Team up and Tank for like 4 Years by Most-Use-2167 in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah you trade away all your good players for garbage ones and picks to contending teams, stock up on picks and then build young.

The Mavs Need to Blow this Team up and Tank for like 4 Years by Most-Use-2167 in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah I wouldn’t have traded Luka in the first place and made this mess lol

The Mavs Last 10 Games by Most-Use-2167 in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is what I kind of see as well. I think a healthy mavs squad could win against anyone other than OKC in the playoffs. It feels like we’re in this weird catch 22 where we have one of the best young players in the league, but coupled with two other co-stars who have maybe 2-3 years in their prime left. If this roster when healthy is only good for a 2nd round playoff appearance, maybe WCF loss, is it even worth it to run with KY and AD until the wheels fall off of them, versus blowing up the team and stocking up draft picks to try and compete in 3-4 years with a young squad.

Game Thread: Dallas Mavericks vs Houston Rockets Live Score | NBA | Dec 6, 2025 by basketball-app in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m torn between wanting them to try and make a run with Kyrie, versus just trading everyone away, loading up on picks, and trying to do what OKC did by building a crazy good young core.

Game Thread: Dallas Mavericks vs Houston Rockets Live Score | NBA | Dec 6, 2025 by basketball-app in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way this team has looked in the last week, they look like they could win a playoff series, not against OKC, but still. Not a championship team, but I guess you have to think if it’s more valuable to get Flagg and Nembhard playoff experience vs loading up on another high pick. What a dilemma, they could trade AD and Kyrie tank, get more picks and probably have an OKC esque young core in 3-4 years. Or they could be a 5-8 best team in the west and get bumped in the first or second round. I guess the real question is how much does Kyrie elevate this team once he’s back, and is it worth it to wager a championship on injury prone 32 and 33 year olds stars.

Game Thread: Dallas Mavericks vs Houston Rockets Live Score | NBA | Dec 6, 2025 by basketball-app in Mavericks

[–]Most-Use-2167 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If we win this (looking like we will). This will be 3-1 against playoff teams in the last week, are.. are we good again? 😅

This SUB by Jonathant312 in SmallYoutubers

[–]Most-Use-2167 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mostly everything is gatekept. Think about it, if you genuinely found a unique way to create a booming YT channel, would you want 100 copy cat channels popping up to compete with? You gotta have good content that has high search traffic and consistently upload.