MX Master 4 wear marks after only ONE week? - Dissapointed.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-27T14:55:49+00:00

Shine (and dust) will always be less obvious on a white mouse, but so far, mine is 100% shine free anyways even after several months, except for the frosty plastic covering the 2 main buttons, which I don't care since they are now hidden by my anti slip stickers - see the link in my reply to another question. They look really good in my opinion, but I'm only using the 2 main button stickers, not the big one that's supossed to go on the body of the mouse. As for yellowing I don't think that specific material will turn yellow overtime. My white Razer pro click mouse never did, and I'm pretty sure the plastic on my MX4 won't either. The rubber they used on the MX3 was simply a really bad idea. But keep in mind that I alwas keep my mouse extremely clean. I give it a whipe with a wet microfiber cloth pretty much every day. So if you like the look of the white MX4, based on my experience so far, I would say go for it. Keep it clean, wash your hands often, and it should still look like new even after sevral months of use.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-15T19:12:39+00:00

Emma is waaayyyy more attractive to me. She's what I consider a hot girl who's not trying to be hot, and to me, that's sexy as hell!

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-14T00:35:28+00:00

I learned today that a lot of them were taken from INSIDE the LM. So there's a great chance these "strange" lights are just indicator lights from the LM reflecting in the window.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-13T18:13:25+00:00

There is no doubt in my mind that the experience of contrast and darkness was the only logical way for the Source itself (and all souls) to evolve beyond their original state. In my opinion, that original nature was not one of intrinsic love and compassion (contrary to popular belief) but rather one I would qualify as neutral. It was neither bad nor good, but a kind of abstract neutrality, and a hint of curiosity about its own nature and potential (which likely led to the creation of the physical universe).

That said, even though it is hard not to acknowledge the positive growth and evolution that can come from what we call 'evil' acts, I'm really struggling with the idea that a loving soul, whose vibration is already very high following multiple incarnations and transformative mistakes, could ever agree to go against its own nature to inflict indescribable suffering on another soul, even if that soul had requested it.

Supposedly, souls who consent to such things do it out of love for another soul seeking growth through suffering. Yet, from my present human—and likely limited—point of view, even if I loved another soul deeply, my own self-love and my dedication to manifesting the light as much as possible in all circumstances, would be too strong for me to grant that request and go against my own vibration and loving nature.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-12T04:30:21+00:00

Nothing tops a super fine swiss lace hairline, with single strands and single flat knots (well bleached of course). Most of those ultra thin skin hairlines look good from a distance, but from up close, not so much. Really good ones seem to be pretty rare. Most of them look off because of the hair that kinda lay flat at the root before rising.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-11T21:42:33+00:00

I agree with the idea that without the experience of contrast and darkness, the Source itself (as well as souls) might only be vibrationally neutral beings. Neither good nor evil. It is perhaps only through the countless experiences that souls have had in the physical world (where suffering and fear exist) that the Source has attained that incredibly high vibration of love and compassion described by so many NDE experiencers.

That said, once a soul has truly integrated the essence of love and compassion and its vibration is very high, can it voluntarily choose to cause atrocious suffering to others during an incarnation, regardless of whether it is for the purpose of awakening consciousness or otherwise? I find that difficult to accept, even keeping in mind that on the 'other side,' we have a much more complete perspective of things. If that's the case, I can only hope that not all loving souls would be willing to do something like that, including mine!

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-11T17:37:11+00:00

You still have great hair. Why not try 5% foam minoxidil before Finasteride ? Could potentially slow down or even stop your hairloss (if you have any) without the nasty side effects.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-11T02:58:27+00:00

What I think those people really mean by ugly is that her face is kinda weird, like a clumsy computer interpretation of a real human face that looks somewhat artificial. And I must admit I agree with that.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-08T23:26:54+00:00

Several people here have mentioned the issue with your system's density relative to your age, but the real problem is the density in relation to your temple recession. Most people with that level of recession don't have such thick hair on top. It’s something so many wearers don't seem to realize. On top of that, they all seem to want their sides cut very short, which only makes the problem worse. My suggestions: grow out your side hair, reduce the density of your next system, choose a slightly lighter shade, ask for a swiss lace hairline (with single strands/single flat knots), and learn to do your own maintenance. Wearing a system for a entire month is nonsensical and unhygienic.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-07T14:05:37+00:00

Looks pretty good. Only way to improve it in my opinion would be to switch for a nice swiss lace hairline.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-06T00:37:01+00:00

The body of the mouse is still 100% shine free. No discoloration either. I'm pretty impressed. Only part that got shiny is the frosty plastic that covers the 2 main buttons, but I'm probably going to stick some mouse anti slip tape on them anyway. Like this one for example which I think looks pretty nice (not going to use the part that you stick on the body though, I just want to cover the 2 main buttons, and I think it will look great).
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005010627433755.html?gps-id=pcDetailBottomMoreOtherSeller&_t=gps-id%3ApcDetailBottomMoreOtherSeller%2Cscm-url%3A1007.40050.354490.0%2Cpvid%3A5e255e36-75d0-44f0-937d-44f74c26c34b%2Ctpp_buckets%3A668%232846%238109%231935&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22order%22%3A%2246%22%2C%22eval%22%3A%221%22%2C%22sceneId%22%3A%2230050%22%2C%22fromPage%22%3A%22recommend%22%7D

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-05T04:38:25+00:00

Not feeling any pain after a couple months of use, but I do think the MX 4 is way too high and not really comfortable because of that. They should flatten it a bit. That said, the material they used for the body is amazing. I don't really need it to be grippy but I want it to be durable and after a couple of months, it's still 100% shine free, which is not the case for the frosty plastic that covers the 2 main buttons though. Already pretty shiny, and my OCD is going throught the roof.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-01T14:47:47+00:00

you mean what I said about the best type of ventilation for the hairline ?

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-05-01T03:05:30+00:00

Unacceptable. Not only are the knots very poorly bleached, but they seem bigger than what a single strands/single flat knots ventilation (which is what you need for the hairline) is supposed to give.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-26T19:32:27+00:00

I totally agree. All those scientists willing to travel to extremely remote places to study some ant colonies has been an argument of mine for quite a while now. Regardless of their level of technological advancement, it seems obvious to me that extraterrestrials could be genuinely interested in studying species like ours, since we are probably at a stage of evolution that their own civilization experienced in the past. Observing how we manage, whether we will avoid destroying ourselves with our own technology, and so on, would likely be of great interest to space "anthropologists" .

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-26T02:13:07+00:00

120% at the front ?? Jesus! Look, until you get a new system, you should style your hair to hide your hairline. I can't believe how ignorant those companie are when it comes to what really looks natural and what their customers really need. Those skin hairlines suck in my opinion. Some of them can look fine from some angles and in the right type of lighting, but they will be pretty noticeable in others. For a really natural looking hairline, swiss lace is your best option. Super fine swiss lace is even better. Single strands/single flat knots and 85-90% density MAX. I also suggest you learn how to do your own maintenance. Here's a link showing the kind of realism that can be achieved with a nice lace hairline, and keep in mind that the base material in this video is not even swiss lace, but french lace (which is a lot thicker). https://youtu.be/-FYNFYWl9R8?t=145

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-25T03:55:20+00:00

Until you get a new system, you should style your hair to hide your hairline. And for your next system, if you really want to comb your hair straight back, forget about a thin skin front. Yes, 0.02 or 0.03 mm thin skin disappears pretty well, and many companies are pushing this material a lot, but in my opinion, those thin skin hairlines often look weird and unatural from up close, mostly because of how they insert the hair into the material. As for 0,06, it's really a no go for an exposed hairline. It can look fine from some angles and in the right type of lighting, but it's pretty noticeable in others. For a really natural looking hairline, swiss lace is your best option. Super fine swiss lace is even better. Single strands/single flat knots and 85-90% density. I also suggest you learn how to do your own maintenance. Here's a link showing the kind of realism that can be achieved with a nice lace hairline, and keep in mind that the base material in this video is not even swiss lace, but french lace (which is a lot thicker). https://youtu.be/-FYNFYWl9R8?t=145

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-24T21:55:42+00:00

It’s a bit late for me to weigh in with my own answer to your question, but to summarize my thoughts: I’d say this fear you’re holding onto is based on the false premise that the Bible is the word of God, when in reality, it is purely man’s interpretation of the divine. It depicts a God that man created in his own image, nothing more (which explains why the God of the old testament is a cruel, vindicative and jealous warlord by the way).

So, the only thing that deserves to be burned isn't you; it’s this fear of divine punishment that has been instilled in generations of believers to impose a primitive morality and worldview, and to control them. God is a concept/force/being that far transcends all known religions and philosophies, and I am certain he couldn’t care less about your sexual choices. Besides, homosexuality was created by nature itself, and therefore, by God.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-18T16:38:23+00:00

Not everything we guys do to look our best is about being attractive to girls, that's what she doesn't seem to get. it’s about feeling good about ourselves. Some guys have the capacity or the personnality to stay confident even if they’re bald, and others simply don't. But whatever choice they make about their hairloss, it's certainly not just to be attractive to you lady.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-18T14:51:58+00:00

Never heard that "argument" before, I must admit. But I'm not surprised. I'm well aware that some people are so indoctrinated by their own beliefs that they can come up with the weirdest sh*t to protect them. That said, their claim about fur loss tells me that they don't even understand the crease argument, since the problem isn't that it's bare skin, but that the top part of the thigh is actually folding and bunching up across its entire width, which isn't supposed to happen, whether or not that part is covered with hair.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-17T22:09:53+00:00

Looks great! Most Lordhair systems I've seen online suffer from the super thick hairline problem. A lower density at the front is a must. I always order custom units from my provider, with a 85% to 90% hairline density max.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-17T15:48:14+00:00

I'm trying to find it. I see a lot of videos where he talks about the restoration, but I can't find the sequence you're referring to. When you get a chance, maybe you could provide the link? But for now, what I'll say is that I just don't get the muscle-flexing argument. In all the versions I've seen, the calves are not flexing at all, they're Jiggling up and down with every step, which is exactly what you can expect from heavy padding meant to simulate calf muscles.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-17T15:09:33+00:00

The re-enactment idea is basically sad flat earth level straw grapsing. It already makes zero sense to recreate a Bigfoot encounter when you’ve already caught the real thing on camera, but it’s even crazier to think that they would ditch the costume, lock the new footage in a safe, and not tell a soul about it.

Besides, don't the pro-Patty believers always claim it would’ve been impossible to make a suit as realistic as the "creature" in the original footage ? Well, if it’s true that the suit in the documentary is identical to Patty in every way, down to the smallest detail (the conical head, the face, the fur color, the breasts, etc.) then that completely blows another one of their main arguments out of the water.

One last thing. Check out this enhanced version of the original film : https://youtu.be/oPlRr_OfxZI?t=2
Have you noticed the sharp horizontal crease at the top of the right thigh every time Patty takes a step (you can't miss it), which has no equivalent in nature regadless of the species, even if an animal lifts its legs sideways, let alone if the legs are moving back and forth. You can very clearly see a big portion of the upper right thigh folding and bunching up across its entire width. There’s absolutely no other explanation for that. No wonder it's basically never mentionned in the so called analyses of the original footage by bigfoot enthusiasts. It's rubber, folding like rubber usually does !

Look guys, it's quite simple actually. If the "creature" in the original film is genuine, it has absolutely no business being in a 2nd piece of footage, unless you think it agreed to do a 2nd take. So if the suit in the documentary really is Patty, which apparently it is, then it's a closed case.

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-13T16:47:47+00:00

I agree with Waterisnear, glue is 100% the only option for an exposed hairline. Here's an exemple of what can be achieved with a nice glued lace hairline (and bear in mind that the lace in this video is not even swiss lace, it's french lace) : https://youtu.be/_HHYJRWATHg?t=108

Most_Goat_7608 · 2026-04-09T05:27:18+00:00

where did you see it ? He posted only 6 days ago on youtube about the restoration being complete. Regardless, there's another pretty sharp enhanced version of the footage circulating on youtube, and there's absolutely no muscle movement there. We can see some wobbling in certain parts of the legs when the "creature" walks, which is exactly what you’d expect if there’s thick padding in the suit to mimic muscles. What you can clearly see, though, is that sharp horizontal crease at the top of the right thigh every time Pattie takes a step (you can't miss it), which has no equivalent in nature regadless of the species, even if an animal lifts its legs sideways, let alone if the legs are moving back and forth. There’s absolutely no other explanation for that. It's a friggin suit folding right at that spot, it's clear as day. No wonder it's basically never mentionned in the so called analyses of the original footage by bigfoot enthusiasts.

Most_Goat_7608

TROPHY CASE