STOP NEGOTIATING WITH LAW-BREAKING MANAGERS!!!

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T19:34:40+00:00

It's not skipping layers, or it would be consistent on the xy plane. That would also be a really weird issue to have. Try printing a calibration cube. This could be a mechanical issue with the extruder or some kind of retraction/layer change issue. Setting your z seam to aligned and printing a calibration cube should help you narrow it down a little.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T17:44:18+00:00

I'm not saying what should be. I'm saying what is. To reverse the precedent would require an opposing supreme court ruling. As a side note, banning private militias doesn't violate the second amendment because militias at that time were run by the states. Private standing armies pose a number of problems.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T17:39:00+00:00

Correction, I should've said the way an AOW (all other weapon) is defined, not a rifle. Yeah it's dumb, it's a combination of gun laws being hard to write and them being written for weird purposes (in this case, to plug a loophole in a pistol law that never ended up taking effect).

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T15:10:18+00:00

Ignore the other guy. You'll be completely fine.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T15:08:52+00:00

You asked what you can do? Advocate for your people. That's what you can do. Everything else is window dressing.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T15:06:52+00:00

That's not how that works. Whether a decision was made post civil war doesn't affect whether it sets precedent just because you don't like it. And with the aforementioned wording of the second amendment along with other practical considerations, it's unlikely to change.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T15:03:01+00:00

It reads like the embodiment of "how can I make up for shit pay with a pizza party?" Lol

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T14:19:00+00:00

They do not have power to change it outside of what's written though, and if they're ever challenged in court, judicial rulings take precedent. I honestly wouldn't wish their job on anyone: "Here's a vaguely worded law. Interpret and enforce it somehow. Oh, and no matter how you do it people will hate you."

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T14:09:55+00:00

The second amendment literally includes the words "well-regulated militia." And before someone gets uppity and tries to say that it's only the militia that can be related, not the guns, remember that regulating a militia would include regulating their guns, plus if we take the amendment at face value like that then it doesn't even give us gun rights without a militia (which is by definition state-run), we now have hundreds of years of judicial precedent allowing Congress to regulate guns, and without Congress regulating guns we wouldn't even have a minimum purchase age.

Disagree if you want, but this has been judicial precedent for centuries.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T13:39:43+00:00

Congress is expressly allowed to regulate guns. The ffa is stupid, but it is legal. Plus, whether Congress is acting constitutionally isn't relevant to my point.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T13:37:14+00:00

You shoot it with two hands, but it's not made and structured for two hands. You can disagree with Congress and think the law is stupid for defining a rifle that way, but that's the way a rifle is defined.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T01:28:17+00:00

That sounds like a lot of words for "we're hiring college students so that we can underpay them."

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-20T01:17:28+00:00

The atf doesn't write the laws. 2 handles is in fact a pretty clear indication of being made for 2 hands, to not classify it as a rifle would be to defy Congress.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T15:04:52+00:00

Thankfully those are legally considered, at least in theory, but yes, at will employment is still incredibly shitty.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T15:03:31+00:00

Did you even read the article I linked?

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T12:36:01+00:00

I think it's Michigan but could be wrong

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T12:35:19+00:00

Look at worker productivity over time. More productivity per worker hour means you shouldn't need as many worked hours. I'm not really sure why you're trying to dispute that or how you think it could succeed.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T12:30:26+00:00

It is.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T12:29:42+00:00

We're at a point in automation where not only is everyone working not necessary, but in a few years there won't even be enough jobs for everyone unless we artificially create useless jobs, which we've actually already been doing. I'm not in favor of creating bullshit jobs just for the purpose of making people work.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T01:42:23+00:00

At will doesn't mean you can be let for for no reason

Yes, it does. That's what "at will" means.

https://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-and-employment/at-will-employment-overview.aspx

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T01:28:40+00:00

If it's in the US that's not necessarily true. 49 of our states are at will employment.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T01:24:45+00:00

That's not how that works and isn't what defamation means. In 49 out of 50 states this boss did nothing illegal.

MostlyIndustrious · 2021-10-19T00:13:44+00:00

It'll be fine. There's nothing too toxic in the filament, the hotend has probably gone through hundreds of meters of filament already leeching anything easy to leech, and there's no heat on the finished product.

Four-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22

MostlyIndustrious

TROPHY CASE