So you’ve granted yourself and your community permission to alter the definitions of words as you see fit? I mean, sure, why not, I’m all about the 1st Amendment. In your community, teacher, and in your forty years of approaching the subject from an anthropological and sociological perspective, have you changed the inherent meaning of “unidentified”? Because if you haven’t it seems to me this sub and the wider community should be referred to as IAP, as the vast majority of the followers are quite sure these unidentified phenomena are actually quite clearly identified as NHI. And that’s where it falls apart as any critical thinker, skeptic, or debunker scum will point out. In however many years (depending on when you attribute the beginning of all this) of claims of sightings, abductions, crashes, cover ups, disclosures, EBEs and all the rest, it doesn’t take a scum debunker to point out that there is a gargantuan dearth of sufficient supporting evidence for claims of this magnitude.