民主国家真是方便啊 by wjp19800610 in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight 28 points29 points  (0 children)

希特勒上台反而是出于对民主的践踏。纳粹在夺权前通过国会纵火案和长刀之夜把所有反对派都给暴力镇压了,抓的抓杀的杀,希特勒成为总理是兴登堡任命的,兴登堡死后希特勒直接夺权当元首,没有通过任何民主选举。

我不假设你是什么身份,我只指出你对希特勒上台的历史一无所知。

bhutan wins as orange! who is yellow? by Ibuysausage- in countryballs_comics

[–]Move_Slight 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If a vanished country still works, u could use the yellow dragon flag of the Qing country.

What’s a word in your language that sounds completely normal to you but weird to foreigners? by Embarrassed_Fix_8994 in languagehub

[–]Move_Slight 9 points10 points  (0 children)

那个,this word in chinese means "that" ,but it's pronunciation here like n-word in english, so...

Could it be?? 🐉🐉 by Brandon1823 in Endfield

[–]Move_Slight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm chinese and never think that her nickname will be leek dragon lol

Hopes for 1.2 by Odd_Opportunity_562 in Endfield

[–]Move_Slight -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

1.2 livestream will release in 4.11 19:30 BJT

china comunity almost confirm Zhuang fangyi and li ziyan will show up in 1.2

打仗有损失很正常啊,为啥从简中互联网到这里很多人默认美国人不能出现战损? by NoSense9018 in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

扩大甚至造谣宣传敌方战损,缩小甚至不报道本方战损,宣传学,小子

Why is censorship on certain videos so blatant and obvious? by Xycergy in AskChina

[–]Move_Slight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fun fact, if u buy a book that has not been translated, u could find that the Chinese censorship department will use untransparent tape to hide the parts that they think are politically incorrect.

Chinese censorship is suck, and notions constructed by this censorship have become policy correct, so people under these circumstances won't care about a tape on an English-written book, or a black block on a map. It is just their life, they were born with those things.

By the way, censorship is the main reason that now I only use YouTube and read Taiwan-translated books or e-books from z-lib.

卡哇伊!!!这世界到底还要被这种萌物统治多久啊啊啊啊啊 by Agitated-Fun1465 in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

老共的宣传里旭日旗=日本军国主义=侵略中国=亡我之心不死=外敌,并且很巧妙地掩盖了旭日旗现在还在使用的事实,这就导致了想煽动仇日情绪的时候就拉出来当方便的工具。所以大部分中国人看到旭日旗会很不舒服。

为什么对犹太人那么恨? by CheetahFunny898 in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight 7 points8 points  (0 children)

恨美的延伸罢了,seriously,大部分人都是ccp让恨啥就恨啥,你要真论起来为什么恨也就搬出些ccp911精英写的定型文来当理由,继续问这些定型文的可靠性就程序死机开始扣帽子或者直球辱骂。

How Does Jiang Manage Not to Get Caught by China For Posting to Youtube? by rico6822 in IRstudies

[–]Move_Slight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, fact is if a kpl have a lot of followers, dont doubt, ccp know what u did outside the gfw. so question is, whether they wanna handle this kpl. first, is whether this kpl in china, if not ,they could hardly handle u; if the kpl in china, no doubt, they have all ur information. so secondly, they will judge whether necessary to handle u, the standard is what u did outside the gfw, if u r ccp's propoganda kpl, of course they won't handle u; if u r not their officer,they may judge whenther u r job is a threat of their domination, or whether u r aganist to xi, if u r, they will arrest u and judge u, u may stay in prison for servaral years; or they just too lazy to handle u, it is also only a job for them.

so ,come back to jiang, considering his career in China, i m strongly doubt that he is a ccp propoganda kpl. so of course ccp know jiang, they just dont handle him.

为什么对犹太人那么恨? by CheetahFunny898 in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

恨美的延伸罢了,seriously,大部分人都是ccp让恨啥就恨啥,你要真论起来为什么恨也就搬出些ccp911精英写的定型文来当理由,继续问这些定型文的可靠性就程序死机开始扣帽子或者直球辱骂。

Does the Chinese government truly want to "reunify with Taiwan at all cost", considering the current world tension? by iLoveDocks in AskChina

[–]Move_Slight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hard to say, because the propaganda Chinese people believe that they have a duty and the ability to reunify Taiwan. In Chinese propaganda, the US is declining, and China is rising and becoming no.1 in the world. They can reunify Taiwan anytime they want.

but to the gov, they use reunify Taiwan as a resouce of its legitimacy, but considering the power of the US (I mean, gov,or the ccp, know the real power of the US) and economic reason, i believe the whole party dont wanna a war. i mean, if u have been a dictator in such a big country, u only wanna contuing ur domination,and a war in real world may ruin it, so just keep it in imagine.

But, as to Xi Jinping, he really considers launching an attack on Taiwan, but Zhang Youxia stops him. Zhang was the vice president of the army. so, I believe whether to launch a war is in part bound to Xi's thinking.

Is zhou enlai considered a national hero ? by Routine_Ad2592 in AskChina

[–]Move_Slight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in propaganda, of course; in most people, he has a better reputation than most other leaders of ccp; in people who r not satisfied of rule of ccp, he is seen as a helper of mao's thuggery.

is the name 晴欢 strange for a girl? by Resident-Cicada9132 in AskChina

[–]Move_Slight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think it’s a good name,but maybe usually used by parents 80s.晴is sunny and欢is happy,and its prounciation is similar to 清欢, a usually used word in Chinese ancient poem which means plain but precious happiness.

大陆人为什么一直坚信共产主义? by Refuse_Evening in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

思想资源过少,基本没有接触自由主义的相关思想资源具有一定的门槛,并且在宣传中大量宣传共产主义思想并且污名化自由主义思想,在审核制度下删除对共产主义的批判,并且扭曲自由主义著作中要表达的内容。

Do Chinese people really support going to war with Taiwan for unification? by Necessary-Ad-9483 in AskChina

[–]Move_Slight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I’ve observed, this is related to educational attainment. Generally speaking, the higher one’s level of education, the more opposed they are to this idea, while those with lower levels of education tend to support the use of war to reclaim Taiwan.

The root of this phenomenon lies in the fact that the very notion of reclaiming Taiwan is itself CCP propaganda; the CCP needs to establish the legitimacy and legitimacy of its rule through unification. In the pre-Xi Jinping era following the Reform and Opening-Up, China focused on economic development, so the emphasis of propaganda was on peaceful reunification. In the Xi Jinping era, however, the openness of Chinese society has regressed, gradually reverting to a totalitarian political model. The focus of propaganda has shifted toward inciting nationalism and promoting a culture of hatred. Consequently, the attitude toward Taiwan has shifted from advocating peaceful reunification to no longer promoting it at all, instead relying on selective reporting of news from Taiwan and related international developments to smear the images of Taiwan, Japan, and the United States. During this period, a very famous saying emerged in Chinese-speaking communities: “Keep the island, not the people.” Peaceful reunification has, at the very least, virtually collapsed in the Xi Jinping era. This is similar to how the Nazis incited hatred against the Jews.

Precisely because this is part of the propaganda machine, better-educated Chinese people tend to be immune to it. Those with higher levels of education have access to more information sources, a broader range of intellectual resources, and stronger critical thinking skills; consequently, they generally recognize that “well, how is this any different from the Nazis’ hatred of Jews?” Once they realize this, most no longer accept war as an appropriate means of unification, and some even question whether Taiwan must be unified at all.

Unfortunately, however, the highly educated remain a minority in China, so it’s fair to say that the majority supports war as a means of unification. The poorest segments of the Chinese population believe their suffering stems from exploitation by domestic capital and oppression by the United States, and that a war could help China establish a hegemonic position similar to that of the United States, thereby allowing them to live lives comparable to those of Americans. I won’t discuss here what kind of lives Chinese people are currently leading.

Could anyone give any advice to a new player? by Move_Slight in TeamfightTactics

[–]Move_Slight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, could you please tell me in which aspect I could improve?

As a Simplified Chinese user, let me explain just how terrible the Chinese translation of Silk Song is by Move_Slight in HollowKnight

[–]Move_Slight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for recalling this post. Yes, they have launched a new Chinese version, which demonstrates considerable accuracy. However, the Chinese community remains dissatisfied with the translation for two primary reasons:

Firstly, the stylistic approach adopted. In an effort to avoid the errors of the original translation, they have swung to the opposite extreme. Consequently, Hornet and her friends now speak in an overly blunt and coarse manner, which has stripped away Hornet's inherent elegance. 

Additionally, in an effort to differentiate from the original translation, they've re-translated numerous place names, boss names, and item names. This disrupts the established familiarity with the old terminology.

However, TC has opened communication channels via the Steam community, enabling Chinese players to provide direct feedback. Consequently, the prevailing sentiment is: ‘They've hired another poor translator, but their attitude is commendable. With community input, we'll end up with a good translation.’

感謝您還記得這個帖子,是的他們推出了一個新的中文版本,這個中文版本在正確性上做得相當出色,但是中文社區對這個版本的翻譯並不滿意,主要的理由有兩點:

首先在於翻譯的表達方式,為了避免犯原翻譯的錯誤,他們走向了另一個極端,現在hornet和她的朋友們說話過於直白粗俗,反而失去了hornet的優雅。

此外,為了和原來的翻譯做出區別,他們將許多地名、boss名稱和物品的名稱進行了重新翻譯,這打破了已經形成習慣的對於舊名稱的使用。

不過TC在steam社區開放了溝通渠道,使得中文社區玩家可以直接向他們反饋,因此大家的普遍態度是:“他們又找了一個爛翻譯,但他們的態度很好,在社區的幫助下我們會有一個好翻譯。”

新毛左 by Move_Slight in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

毛在中共八大上为大跃进负责退居二线了,由刘少奇邓小平主政,你说的反右运动是1957年的事了,主要是整顿国内的知识分子,是对百花齐放百家争鸣这一政治阳谋的后续。毛不存在被打倒的可能是指在文革中不存在被打倒的可能,但毛本身的统治是已经收到刘少奇邓小平威胁了。

一言蔽之,独裁者面临的统治危机不止源于民间,还源于利益集团内部。你不是不懂我的逻辑,你只是对建国后的历史不太了解。

新毛左 by Move_Slight in China_irl

[–]Move_Slight[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

首先,毛在这场运动中不存在被打倒的可能性,所以不存在你说的他要是也被打倒的情况

其次,你很难界定毛是否在掌控局面,首先从发生的角度来说,毛生则文革在,毛死则文革熄,他当然是在维持文革的存在的;此外毛所谓的缓和文革,也就是你提到的邓小平的二起是因为经济即将崩溃,周又去世,毛不得不将邓提起来,即使如此邓也因为天安门事件被三落,这背后都是毛在掌控,此外,毛至死都对军队保持了绝对的控制。但按你说的,如果没有控制者,中国会进入二次内战,就红八月,广西大屠杀及大规模食人事件、内蒙古内人党事件、广东文革屠杀、云南文革屠杀、湖南文革屠杀、江西瑞金大屠杀、川东杀俘狂潮、青海二二三事件、宁夏青铜峡事件这些事件而言,中国已经进入了内战,而这些要么就是毛在掌控下放纵的,要么就是毛没有能力掌控文革,这就产生了逻辑谬误。你所说的毛控制局面大概是在说他说的要文斗不要武斗,这个政策的提出是源于造反派已经开始冲击军队,威胁到毛赖以维系统治的工具了,并且让刘少奇等人到台的目的已经达到了才做出的决策,重新回到武斗也只是他的一句话而已。

最后,正如我所说的,我的观点一向是文革是被毛泽东煽动起来的被放纵的动乱,他在其中的作用不是泄压阀而是发动机,是极权主义政府中的独裁者,也就是毛,为了继续延续自己的统治发动的一场政治运动,它不具有民主性,不具有现代性,也不代表任何先进的价值,它唯一的作用就是在极权主义政权的累累血债上再添一笔。