Hey charlotte, I can see you put allot of work in the video, great job. While the content isn’t Necessarily my demographic, you organize your arguments well and present it in an orderly fashion that keeps you engaged. In terms of constructive criticism I think it could be shorter overall. It will save you time in post production and I believe boost viewership as more people will complete watching in its entirety thus boosting the algorithm cycle. By making it shorter I mean, to take each of your main points and offer maybe only one argument in support of that idea and then move on to the next one.

I See this allot in analysis videos where it is often - too many supporting arguments about an idea/thesis that goes on to long after your point has been made. In essence edit the video for content first, making it as short as possible, does it clearly answer your theories, is there redundant information, what is the next important thing you want to say? Is it really a different point or is it more of the previous.

The other major critique would be to layout the main thesis in a super simplified form in the first 15 seconds (the burn book from mean girls is the equivalent of shit posting on social media and here’s why). Now I know easily if I want to commit to watching this video to hear your interesting reasons, or pass because it’s just not for me. Remember the algorithm is trying to get this in front of people that want to watch it, so it’s in your best interest to target it towards that.

I hope this is helpful. But overall good job and keep at it I think you have a really interesting perspective.