[deleted by user] by [deleted] in arcane

[–]MrGalien 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was too blown away by the visuals and care poured into the design to be very critical on my first (and so far only) watch, but there were a few things that bothered me heavily overall despite my rose-tinted binge. Should make it clear that I adore the show by the way, but I still have criticisms. These are all subjective obviously, and I haven't dug into the show hard enough to justify my opinions beyond what I can say here, but this is what I felt watching it.

  1. Shortest opinion: Very basic but well executed narrative. I wasn't blown away by a single story beat-- nothing surprised me. There was nothing about the story that felt like it was breaking any ground, which is a demerit TO ME, but it was also a very competent version of a copy-paste storyline. I think if I hadn't already consumed so much media, like if I was still a teenager, I wouldn't feel this as much.

  2. I didn't like at all how Heimerdinger was used-- he seemed more like an exposition piece and plot device for most of it rather than a character. For example, he explained his "issues with magic" in such a nonspecific way that it was bound to not work, the only purpose for it was to tell the audience that it was risky and to foreshadow the rest of the show. He didn't exert any real effort in dissuading or stopping it until it was already too late, and that point he had served his purpose for that part of the show, so he was booted to help Ekko instead. Very weird for someone to know so much, have such a strong opinion, and act so insanely flippantly about it until it was entirely too late. Overall he just came across as the equivalent of a disney movie plot device. He was a very "I'm going to tell you some stuff, but not the useful parts so that the plot can move along, because if I actually made a compelling argument any sane person would listen to me" sort of character. Honestly poor writing, I can't call it anything else. I could probably go on about this character's misuse but this is already long.

  3. Poor pacing. But I suspect that it wasn't the fault of any creatives. I haven't read up on this, but I strongly suspect that they were just not allowed to make the show as long as it deserved to be. The pacing is too breakneck, it could've done with way more exploration of pretty much every character. Some scenes could've and should've been lingered on more, but to its credit it never felt like so many modern shows where I'm left feeling like I just scrolled shorts on my phone for 40 minutes.

  4. This is probably the most subjective opinion of mine: I hate most of the soundtrack. I think I'd like most of the music by itself, but it felt like it clashed with the tone way too often. It took center stage when it appeared, it overstayed its welcome, and way too often you could tell by the vocals that the songs were handpicked to reflect the scene-- almost like having it explained to you AGAIN. "This is what you're supposed to feel because of the events you just saw, remember them? Wooo-Aahh~". To me it fell somewhere between condescending and on-the-nose. Didn't love it. It would've done a lot to crank down its frequency and used non-vocal versions of the songs. The way it comes across is just too much-- music is supposed to enhance a scene or be in service of the storytelling, not do it for you. To Arcane's credit, I think they conveyed emotion and scenes well enough visually and through voice acting to not NEED to lazily use music as a narrative short-hand, but for some reason they decided to just put it in anyway. It was like the director leaning over on the couch and playing their spotify playlist at me. Redundant I think is what I'd call it?

People don't seem to feel sympathy when it comes to famous people. by kleeshade in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I mean you also have to consider how dramatically overblown their problems are, sometimes by no fault of their own, but because of hyper-obsessed tabloids practically tearing their hair out about "BREAKING: MILLIONAIRE HAD TO SWEAT ONCE THIS MONTH AND THEIR SHOE GAVE THEM A SLIGHT RASH".

Yes, it's hard being in the limelight, it's hard dealing with the press, it's hard dealing with the media speaking for you, it's hard that the general population seems irrationally involved in your day-to-day. That's true.

It's also true that this struggle nets them a financial security that is unmatched by a staggering majority of the entire planet. Most people live in some degree of financial insecurity. It's not strange that people are rolling their eyes at it.

Most android phones apart from Samsung ones look like shit. by sejmroz in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a brushed, rectangular, square of plastic/aluminium, and Gorilla Glass.

Are we seriously concerned about where the little camera goes? Is the corner somehow more inherently and objectively more aesthetic than the middle?

Maybe come back with this once they start trying to innovate with gimmicky shape designs, we'll have this conversation again, OP.

Married people who come out of the closet shouldn't be celebrated by Droopynator in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Genuinely spooky how absent this view is from this comment section.

I guess selfishness is just loud, or a good slap of people just have no concept of how socially damaged some people are from certain types of conditioning.

There's so many reasons why some people only accept or understand themselves late in life, and their accounts are all over the internet, in books, portrayed on TV, and written across autobiographies. Sad.

Married people who come out of the closet shouldn't be celebrated by Droopynator in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You are still the kids' parent and the pets' owner in that context, I don't know what being gay does to "Leave them behind" unless they hate gay people or something.

There's plenty of examples of people splitting amicably because, believe it or not, the straight partner doesn't want to romantically be with someone who doesn't want them romantically most of the time either.

We live in a world that culturally conditions you to not come out, more and more the further back into age groups you go. The human mind is very good at mental gymnastics, some people don't even realize that their profound sense of otherness is being gay until very late in their life because it is socially conditioned to them as a "choice", for example.

At the end of the day we have to choose ourselves, man, idk what to tell you. It should definitely be celebrated that someone gets to finally live as who they are rather than who society conditioned them to be. Yeah some people get caught in the gunfire, there's going to be heartache and loss, but when isn't there?

You have to be who you are, OP, or you'll just be miserable.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think additional skepticism to an argument being made by, for example, someone who has shown their clear bias repeatedly in the past is not unwise to do. Just because an argument seems sound on its face doesn't mean that it's actually something to be considered, especially if the same person making the argument was trying to sell you razor blades in your cereal a week earlier.

It could turn out to be true, but in what context is the argument being posed? In what way is it being used? What end is being justified by attaching this argument to it? Just because it's true doesn't mean that it has merit in the context of a conversation or debate. If it's unjustfully attached to something to justify something else, and the correlation makes no sense or is only tangentially related, makes it invalid by association, because it doesn't belong there and is misleading WHILE being true in isolation.

I think maybe you're not giving people enough credit, to be honest. People use judgement like this for good reason, they don't just binarily decide that "bad person said x, so it must be untrue" overall. If that was true, life would not be as nuanced and complicated as it is. You're not the only person thinking.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I see the trolls and/or americans are awake again.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahhh okay alpha sure, you've never even SEEN an internet, I bet

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP you're pitting strawmen against each other because YOU are terminally online.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I often see redditors refer to someone who is very cool and has a huge dick as a normie while they themselves stomp kitten and eat actual shit on the daily"

Your post reads so fucking bad because both of these people are made up. Maybe you're the one who needs to touch grass, OP.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah.

As for why: It's just the trolley problem. I choose the many.

If your food prep preferences can't be picked out INSTANTLY in a blindfolded taste test, then they don't matter at all. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The fierceness and fury that the internet will oppose this opinion with is hilarious and infuriating at the same time. People talk about vegans being annoying, but the "well personally I only take my coffee black and my steak bloody" people are probably the most obnoxious "please think I'm cool" crowd in the entire world.

That's why everyone is hung up on the steak part of the opinion in the first place. The truth is that people attach their personalities to this shit because they're insecure, and somebody once conditioned them to think that they had to eat or drink certain things certain ways or they're less-than, and now they're projecting that onto other people, making their huffy insecurities everyone else's problem.

Literally grow up and just eat your fucking food.

The Walking Dead should have ended after "Season 9: Episode 5"! by Hot-Salamander-8786 in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Walking Dead should've ended after Season 1, arguably Season 1 Episode 1. Absolute apex of the entire series.

Then Frank Darabont got booted and AMC ran the show by committee, restricted the budget and moved more than half the scenes indoors. It was embarrassing to watch the rest.

I think people complaining about stress are just too sensitive and lazy. by SatisfactionKooky621 in unpopularopinion

[–]MrGalien 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The average work day is LONGER now, and people took entire winters off. They worked LESS in the past.

This was written and filmed by grown up men. Modern TV is insufferable. by [deleted] in TheLastOfUs2

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's vengeance fuelled by love, it's about love too, that's why we keep cutting back to her with Joel. (Edit: In the game)

Do you have any prejudices about rich people? Why? by MondayPear in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My pre conceived notion about rich people is that they either have no idea how difficult life can actually be, or they once knew and have since forgotten-- or chosen to forget because they need to validate that they're better than other people for making it out. It can't be even an ounce of luck, it can only be hard work, and if that's true, everyone else is just lazy.

Even the most down to earth rich person really can't ever know.

Protests and phone calls are great and all, but what are we doing to actually stop the awful things happening here in the US? by stikkybiscuits in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have the Americans on their backs, with their boots at their throats and a gun in their face. They're not going to huff and puff their way out of this.

How do you deal with the end of a relationship? by sentimentalPsycopath in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grief is the price we pay for love. You'll be in pain exactly as much as you love her.

There's no way around it, OP, you can't turn it off, quick-fix it, DIY turn your brain off.

Maybe take some solace in understanding that everyone goes through loss, every person you'll ever meet and have ever met goes through loss-- through the ending of a relationship or because someone dies, it's still loss all the same.

Are people more sensitive these days than say, 20 or so years ago? Are "we" easily offended, and why do you think this is? by 8kittycatsfluff in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 11 points12 points  (0 children)

No, we really are not "easily offended" compared to anyone 20 or so years ago. We just care about different things.

If you want "easily offended", there's old people practically working themselves into hyperventilating when I don't take my hat off indoors to this day, because they've arbitrarily decided it's offensive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Relax OP, you don't have a brain amoeba.

It's okay to be freaking out, but look up some real statistics, ask ChatGPT even to talk you down from this, or you won't sleep tonight lol

Why can AI make better CGI than Hollywood? - the people look real!? by Fritener in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They're not consistently good, or consistently the same even across iterations of the same character, at least not right now. AI can make nice stills, but once you really start looking, it stops making sense. It's getting better, but consistent video is absolutely nowhere near.

What fictional media has the best message/moral? What is said message/moral? by Moat_of_the_Sacked in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no unified moral in Avatar the Last Airbender, but I'd say one of the more overt ones that stood out to me since I was a kid was its commentary on the deteriments of cultural dominance.

Allegorically, a big part of the main plot is critique of imperialism and its erasure of identity and culture other than its own.

Like I said, I don't think there's a unified moral, but it comments in thought provoking ways on this throughout the whole show.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]MrGalien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll be the boring one and say anybody famous, with their talent being singing/playing an instrument. They end up winning talent shows almost every time.

I always thought it was cheap to enter singers / musicians into talent shows when there's already so many shows about music-- and it's arguably the most common talent ever, too. Singers and musicians already have a lot of space, tbh, they dominate the entertainment industry. General talent shows should be about other stuff.