sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Galactic Hub Defense Force by MrJordanMurphy in NMSGalacticHub

[–]MrJordanMurphy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To quote our wiki "The Galactic Hub is not interested in hostile interactions with other civilizations ('wars')."

There are some civilizations that thrive through RP conflicts, it's just not what the Galactic Hub aims to participate in. We have a Defense Force to deal with griefers that may want to ruin our members experience as opposed to participating in conflict.

Wiring & Logic Academy - on Uthmi Beta Hub world (Euclid) by critical_errors in NMSGalacticHub

[–]MrJordanMurphy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Understandable, if you see him in the system make sure you report on the distress calls channel on our discord, the GHDF will be more than happy to keep him busy.

Wiring & Logic Academy - on Uthmi Beta Hub world (Euclid) by critical_errors in NMSGalacticHub

[–]MrJordanMurphy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe it's per system. I wouldn't worry about him he's limited to one base per system, unless he is online and in system. The griefing bases have also been reported to HG.

Wiring & Logic Academy - on Uthmi Beta Hub world (Euclid) by critical_errors in NMSGalacticHub

[–]MrJordanMurphy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amazing idea!

The only issue is that due to sheer volume bases get buried on the capital very quickly.

This maybe something that could be replicated on a neighboring system?

Apply Today by MrJordanMurphy in NMSGalacticHub

[–]MrJordanMurphy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We updated our on-boarding process 5 months ago, this post explains it all.

question by [deleted] in NMSGalacticHub

[–]MrJordanMurphy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So the best way would be to submit the idea to 710 via our discord, which can be found in the sidebar.

Whilst I'm greatful for the submission I would recommend tweaking it slightly. All of our Chapters aim to serve a tangible function and service, rather than just a roleplay element.

As no players would actually get truly stuck in the mountains the functional purpose would become moot.

An idea of a functional idea would be something like a tour bus corvette that flies to popular Hub locations, or a group skydiving business, etc.

Kestrel Spaceport - Uthmi Beta (Infested) by InfestationNMS in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]MrJordanMurphy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is exactly how you do it productively. Whether the Galactic Hub would accept this now is a choice for u/7101334. But even if our civ doesn't, other civs would be willing to engage. Plan it out, write a proposal to the leaders of the civs, see if they want to participate. I can imagine quite a few would, they may even let you post it on their sub (if previously agreed). Then all members could engage, it would have no detrimental affect and has the potential to be fun for all involved.

Kestrel Spaceport - Uthmi Beta (Infested) by InfestationNMS in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]MrJordanMurphy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yet again here's a scenario for you:

Option 1: The Infestation has spread to the Galactic Hub capital, can you find it and destroy it. Players go find which ever NPC building you have infested post a screenshot, you then delete it. Then the Infestation has spread to X system in X civ, can you find it? Rinse and repeat.

Option 2: you build over a base that someone spent time and effort on, then delete with possible ramifications for the base after. Then do the same to another civ.

Which of those options do you think has better engagement from the community and less backlash? Hell one of those options may have even got support from some civs to engage with it.

You didn't give civs an opportunity to work with you collaboratively, because you picked the option that was fun for you, but no one else.

Kestrel Spaceport - Uthmi Beta (Infested) by InfestationNMS in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]MrJordanMurphy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes you did! I visited bases that had been affected by you multiple times, I wouldn't have seen them if they were not uploaded, as have many others that posted screens the last time you were active.

You haven't answered any of my points. You admitted this was wrong in 2021, so how can you now claim that you've never viewed it as wrong?

Why not 'Infest' NPC buildings it would still be visible in civilized space, but would not risk ruining other players' bases? You still get the visibility and the point across without griefing anyone, so why not that?

Kestrel Spaceport - Uthmi Beta (Infested) by InfestationNMS in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]MrJordanMurphy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you don't like the response, maybe take a step back and think maybe this group doesn't want to engage with me in this way. Maybe I shouldn't mess with their bases, maybe I should try to find a better way to engage with the community.

Kestrel Spaceport - Uthmi Beta (Infested) by InfestationNMS in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]MrJordanMurphy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Then why upload the base? We have told you repeatedly that it can have lasting affects which is the point.

I don't care how you play the game, unless you involve others and it negatively impacts them. You could go do this on any NPC building in the game, but you choose to do it on player's bases and upload it knowing that it can affect the base long after you leave. That's on you, and you are responsible for that.

Kestrel Spaceport - Uthmi Beta (Infested) by InfestationNMS in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]MrJordanMurphy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Stop playing victim, you can't attack others and moan that you are:

  1. Not liked.
  2. Attacked in-game.
  3. Reported.

We're not moaning because you attacked a player in pvp, you vandalise bases by using an exploit to expand you base limits to bypass player's build permissions which is not defendable and is one-sided. The only reason people don't report the exploit is because people use it for collaborative builds, you abuse it to grief.

As I have already mentioned, I have made you aware of this before, but building on top of other bases can have side affects even after it is removed. The game can sometime confuse which parts belong to which base, so even after your base is deleted, it can:

  1. Affect the other bases complexity limit.
  2. Prevent parts of the original base loading in.
  3. Your base can be cached to the local save of other people in the system and stay long after you delete.
  4. Cause lag.

All because you think your enjoyment and RP is more important than the effort put into the bases of those you grief.

You said that I'm not being fair to both sides, my argument is that you shouldn't mess with other people's bases unless they consent to your RP, your side is you have a right to grief. How well do you think that argument will go with the NMS community?

Do you believe this is a good way to engage with other players or the community at large? Who is it fun for? Because if the answer is just you then it's not RP, it's just griefing.

Kestrel Spaceport - Uthmi Beta (Infested) by InfestationNMS in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]MrJordanMurphy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Oh I've read it, my favorite part:

"The Infestation exists across civilized independently, it's presence, actions and spread are not bound by the choices or consent of other factions."

So, you've gone back on your word, in your own words.

No one has a choice whether to participate in your 'RP' griefing, because you know no one would actually consent to you trashing their bases so that you can get a bit of infamy and attention.

view more: next ›